while talking to my mother about child care she said that its best for baby to be home with its parents. I said that I believe its important that the child be around other children and she said "yes, but not when they are too young." I asked her what too young was and she said that kids under 2 are too young to be in daycare. I know its just a preference, but I am wondering what you ladies thought on the topic.
Re: What age is too young to go to daycare ?
For me personally, I think it's ideal to have them on a one on one situation for the first 3 years, then enrolled in a preschool. If I had to work full time and needed full time childcare, I would probably choose a nanny until I could put the kids in preschool. My current childcare arrangement has me working part time with the kids being watched by my mom/DH while I'm at work, and I really like it. With that being said, we started my DS in part time daycare at 18 months per the recommendation of my pedi due to his speech delay, and it has been a wonderful influence.
Do I think that people who need to put their kids in daycare at 6 weeks old are scarring them for life? Of course not. Just not my personal preference.
I personally don't think kinds *need* the socialization of daycare until they are around a year and a half, however that doesn't mean that some kids don't benefit from it before then.
Lily went to daycare for the first time when she was 20 months and flourished. She LOVES it even more this year. I am going to have to quit my job when this baby arrives for financial reasons, but we are trying to figure out if we can keep Lily in her daycare two days a week until at least next summer because she just loves it so much and gets so much out of it. After that we hope to get her in a preschool program.
If I had been able to keep this job ideally I would have like to have a nanny for the baby and send Lily to preschool a few mornings a week.
Well it's fine that your mom feels this way, but not everyone can just stay home with their child. Lots of people need to work.
That said, my daycare would not take babies under 6 weeks old. I stayed home for 3 months and think that was pretty ideal. I probably would have stayed home longer if I had more leave, but I was pretty bored at home. My baby is doing really well and learning a ton already.
I don't need to work, but I would not be happy at home with my baby all the time. I love her but I love my career. So, I totally disagree with your mom.
I totally agree with this (other than group care shouldn't really start before baby is six weeks).
My DD started child care with a wonderful, accredited family child care provider at 14 weeks. Our provider has at least two assistants at all times, so DD got a lot of one-on-one care while she was there.
Our provider is closed for the summer and I can tell that DD is getting bored staying home every day. She misses playing with other children - I can tell because any time we see another child when we are out she tries to play with them!
I think for kids that are naturally shy and reserved, it's probably harder, but having group care be a part of their lives from the beginning is likely to make it easier as they get older and experience separation anxiety.
Even if you want to and are able to be a SAHM, it's important for kids younger than two to have opportunities to play with other children as well as to be cared for people other than their parents.
TTC since 11/05...ectopic pg 4/08...early m/c 6/09...BFP 10/5/09!

Nora B...June 15, 2010...8lbs, 8oz...Med-free birth!
TTC #2 since 7/11...cycle #3 of Clomid + IUI = BFP

Malcolm...September 21, 2012...8lbs, 6oz...Another med-free birth!
What is the base for which option is better? Because a mom or her mom thinks one option is better doesn't make it so. You have success stories on both side. I don't think it matters in the end. I doubt there is any conclusive research that shows 3 months is worse than 2 years.
My daycare is awesome. Lots of emphasis on early childhood development and it is close to my work so I can go by during lunch. I choose to work because I enjoy it. I don't think I would do well as a sahm - my kid and I would get bored.
this- exactly.
any good, caring, situation = good for babies.... if it's daycare, home, whatever. Children who are in daycare from an early age on do just fine - my kids are a great example of that. All started at 5mo and all are very attached to me, very good with other people, other kids, etc.
6 weeks, after that there are many pros & cons for all care situations. There are crappy nannies out there & grandparents who don't necessarily provide ideal care even if it is one on one, so it all depends on the children, caregivers & family needs to me....
And to add to Kathryn's comment- my mother was DEFINITELY not thrilled w/ my decision to do DC over a nanny but once she visited there w/ me a couple times (including a time DS puked all over himself & his carseat & the teachers were all over us trying to help & clean up etc) and watched them on the webcam, she has become a total convert & now rolls her eyes at her friends who talk about how they're not happy that their grandkids might go to daycare...she sees all the benefits for the kids as well as for me/us as a family. (My ILs have never really commented to my knowledge, but their other grandchildren have had all different care situations, 2 are stay at home moms, 1 mom used an au pair & another used a daycare facility also so I dont know if they really have any strong feelings about it).
Again, not to say nannies or home care are not good options, this is just the best fit for us. The sickness sucks in the beginning but if kids start at 2, they'll get sick all the time too, and if they don't do it til 4 or 5 they'll get sick all the time. It is just the way it is.
You do what you have to do. Not everyone has family close by to help care for LO. I also felt more comfortable with LO in a group setting (ie daycare center) rather with a stranger in my home. Those reasons include her being with licensed teachers in a licensed facility, not having to deal with when the nanny/teacher is sick, and the socialization. DD has been in daycare since 12 weeks and has done well. The teachers love her and she gets to hang around babies her age and up to 1 year old. It's wonderful for her!
My time with her in the mornings, evenings, and all day during my 3 day weekends are special. That's when she gets full on one on one time. I think it's a good combination for us.
My son has just started seeming less, for lack of a better word, newborn-ish in the last week or so. So I think before 12 weeks, I'd be uncomfortable putting him in daycare. I know some parents have no choice and I totally get that and don't judge them at all. If I was in their position, I'd do the exact same thing.
Now if I were a SAHM, I'd probably put my DS in daycare once a week for socialization starting at about 18 months.
With my first child my MIL told me that babies need to be watched by family for the 1st 3 years of their lives. I am a firm believer in sending the kid to school, I offered a compromise where DS would go to school 2X a week and she can watch him 3X a week, she said no deal so we sent DS to day care at 6 months old. She has seen that DS turned out quite out, very social, very articulate etc so now with DD I asked her if she would watch her for the 1st year (really it's because DS now goes to an in home day care and with older kids at school, I prefer to not send DD until she can walk), she was very agreeable to however long I want her to watch DD.
Back to your question, my personal preference is to send DC to school (whether it is mother's day out, day care, in home etc sometime between 1-1.5 years old. However, if I didn't have a choice I would send my child whenever we needed, as long as the baby is getting the proper care and love that is needed.
Too young to attend daycare = under 6 weeks old. This is the youngest most daycares will allow you to enroll your infant.
I agree with this.
I wish I had the option to be at home with my kid and not have to enroll him/her in daycare at 6 weeks but I don't.
Baby #3 is on the way! EDD 3/8/15
DD1--8/29/10
DD2--11/6/12
That's such an individulized question, which depends on the parents and the child. For me, I probably would agree with your mother. I think 2.5 is a decent age to start some type of part-time preschool program.
I stayed at home for 3 years and DS started preschool at age 3. During the school year he's there full time and during the summer, part-time. I wish he could go part time all year but for financial reasons I have to work full time during the academic year.
Ditto this - both sets of parents thought daycare was a place where you just plop a kid down in front of the tv and give them an occassional bottle. Once they saw the love and affection the kids got from each of the teachers, how much attention and interaction they had from the teachers and then the opportunity to socialize with other kids, they realized that it was a great place for the kids.
DD -- 5YO
DS -- 3YO
babies adapt. They know no different then what they get. If you start them at daycare at 6 weeks, they'll adapt then. If you start them at pre-school, they'll adapt then.
There are positives and negatives to both. If you can keep them home in the beginning, they'll get sick less. But if you start them early, their immune systems will be much stronger, and they'll be much more socialized at an earlier age.
My son is 18 monthss. He is starting daycare next week; its time for him to be around other kids, and have a routine cirriculum of activities with other kids. It was a personal decision and what is right for him.
Its an individual decision for every family, based on what is necessary for returning to work, paired with what you can afford, and what is best for baby.