"Making the decision to have a child is momentous. It is to decide forever to have your heart go walking around outside your body."
Goodbye little angel(7/22/2011)....see you in heaven
Goodbye my second angel (9/18/2011)
The ticker/picture warning over there, in any post, are just ridiculous. God forbid someone with children try to conceive. It's just not fair to those trouble borrowers on cycle 2 with 35 posts.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
The ticker/picture warning over there, in any post, are just ridiculous. God forbid someone with children try to conceive. It's just not fair to those trouble borrowers on cycle 2 with 35 posts.
You'd probably need two picture warnings, because of the two cute little boys in your sig. Better warn them extra.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I've never understood ticker/picture warnings (except when posting on TTCAL or the IF boards). I don't know why people assume that only first timers could possibly be posting on message boards.
I am actually shocked that they put up with a trying for a sibling post at all. I would think most of the women over there would respond "how dare you want a second child when I haven't had one yet!"
I am actually shocked that they put up with a trying for a sibling post at all. I would think most of the women over there would respond "how dare you want a second child when I haven't had one yet!"
I thought the exact same thing.
Little Lurky, born 2008
Priss28King is wise.--"Lurky, you are so mean... but always so on point!"
I've never understood ticker/picture warnings (except when posting on TTCAL or the IF boards). I don't know why people assume that only first timers could possibly be posting on message boards.
I don't get warnings for those boards either. If there are days you can't handle seeing tickers or pictures then step away from the computer and take a break. I don't see how seeing a picture of a child you don't know and has no baring on you IRL needs a warning. Women aren't exempt to losses or IF, after having a child.
I've never understood ticker/picture warnings (except when posting on TTCAL or the IF boards). I don't know why people assume that only first timers could possibly be posting on message boards.
I don't get warnings for those boards either. If there are days you can't handle seeing tickers or pictures then step away from the computer and take a break. I don't see how seeing a picture of a child you don't know and has no baring on you IRL needs a warning. Women aren't exempt to losses or IF, after having a child.
Exactly. Plus, correct me if I'm wrong, but most of those ladies demanding this haven't even been trying for a year. Major eyerollz.
Little Lurky, born 2008
Priss28King is wise.--"Lurky, you are so mean... but always so on point!"
Am I alone in thinking that people TTC might *like* to see pictures of babies/kids? That's how I felt when I was on TTGP, but apparently this is not a popular feeling.
I've never understood ticker/picture warnings (except when posting on TTCAL or the IF boards). I don't know why people assume that only first timers could possibly be posting on message boards.
I don't get warnings for those boards either. If there are days you can't handle seeing tickers or pictures then step away from the computer and take a break. I don't see how seeing a picture of a child you don't know and has no baring on you IRL needs a warning. Women aren't exempt to losses or IF, after having a child.
I didn't have a problem with pictures or tickers on TTCAL. I always gave a warning when I was PgAL if I went to TTCAL because that was the "rule" of the board. Rule is the right term, but I can't think of what word I want to use. I also give a warning if I'm responding to a late loss question on the m/c/loss board.
Fuuck TTC - I'm moving on.
"It's a child, not a cheeto" Thanks mmariluh!
"Ew. I've read all of two posts from you, and you stink like rotting garbage."
I've never understood ticker/picture warnings (except when posting on TTCAL or the IF boards). I don't know why people assume that only first timers could possibly be posting on message boards.
I don't get warnings for those boards either. If there are days you can't handle seeing tickers or pictures then step away from the computer and take a break. I don't see how seeing a picture of a child you don't know and has no baring on you IRL needs a warning. Women aren't exempt to losses or IF, after having a child.
I didn't have a problem with pictures or tickers on TTCAL. I always gave a warning when I was PgAL if I went to TTCAL because that was the "rule" of the board. Rule is the right term, but I can't think of what word I want to use. I also give a warning if I'm responding to a late loss question on the m/c/loss board.
This is/was my issue with TTCAL- if you are at a place to start trying again why is it you can't deal with tickers or pictures? Are you only going to be okay with yourself being the one getting pregnant? No one else?
Fuuck TTC - I'm moving on.
"It's a child, not a cheeto" Thanks mmariluh!
"Ew. I've read all of two posts from you, and you stink like rotting garbage."
I've never understood ticker/picture warnings (except when posting on TTCAL or the IF boards). I don't know why people assume that only first timers could possibly be posting on message boards.
I don't get warnings for those boards either. If there are days you can't handle seeing tickers or pictures then step away from the computer and take a break. I don't see how seeing a picture of a child you don't know and has no baring on you IRL needs a warning. Women aren't exempt to losses or IF, after having a child.
I get what you're saying but I guess I just understand ticker warnings more on those boards. I post on 3T (and the IF board occasionally) and tickers don't bother me and I don't see a need for warnings but I can somewhat understand people thinking it would be a good idea to PUT a ticker warning on those boards, not necessarily for people to expect them - if that makes any sense.
Hold up, what happened to StarAnus? Are we starting to get in to holiday babies again? God forbid her kids be due around St Patty's day or Easter.
I haven't seen her post on TB in forever. The last time I really even heard her mentioned was a few months ago when she was involved in a board war between two off boards.
I've never understood ticker/picture warnings (except when posting on TTCAL or the IF boards). I don't know why people assume that only first timers could possibly be posting on message boards.
I don't get warnings for those boards either. If there are days you can't handle seeing tickers or pictures then step away from the computer and take a break. I don't see how seeing a picture of a child you don't know and has no baring on you IRL needs a warning. Women aren't exempt to losses or IF, after having a child.
I get what you're saying but I guess I just understand ticker warnings more on those boards. I post on 3T (and the IF board occasionally) and tickers don't bother me and I don't see a need for warnings but I can somewhat understand people thinking it would be a good idea to PUT a ticker warning on those boards, not necessarily for people to expect them - if that makes any sense.
Yeah, they are on a baby board. They should expect them without warnings. They shouldn't leave their house if they don't want ot see children or babies. No one is going to warn them there is a baby about to enter the store or be on the next aisle.
Personally, I think they are all BSC. When I came on TB after my miscarriage, I loved seeing the baby pics people had up. This isn't going to come out right, but seeing a baby pic and a note remembering a loss gave me hope. It meant that others had gone through what I was going through and they not only survived, but got pregnant and had a healthy baby afterwards. I just don't get their "if I can't have one, no one should and don't show it if you do" attitude and the constant rules.
Personally, I think they are all BSC. When I came on TB after my miscarriage, I loved seeing the baby pics people had up. This isn't going to come out right, but seeing a baby pic and a note remembering a loss gave me hope. It meant that others had gone through what I was going through and they not only survived, but got pregnant and had a healthy baby afterwards.
Re: I realize that the WTFTTGP posts are never ending, but
Priss28King is wise.--"Lurky, you are so mean... but always so on point!"
TTC#1 Chart
TTC#2 Chart
IUI #1 - #4 (repronex trigger) = BFN
IUI#5 on 10/28/2008 ** BFP 11/10/08 ** EDD 07/21/09 *** It's a GIRL (07/14/09)
med/treatment free BFP 06/28/10. EDD 03/05/11 *** GIRL #2 (02/23/11)
beta#1 @ 17dpo = 1296 .... beta#2 @ 19dpo = 3034
it's the Bug and Baby Belle!
Goodbye little angel(7/22/2011)....see you in heaven
Goodbye my second angel (9/18/2011)
You'd probably need two picture warnings, because of the two cute little boys in your sig. Better warn them extra.
Okay, I'm down with it.
Priss28King is wise.--"Lurky, you are so mean... but always so on point!"
I thought the exact same thing.
Priss28King is wise.--"Lurky, you are so mean... but always so on point!"
I don't get warnings for those boards either. If there are days you can't handle seeing tickers or pictures then step away from the computer and take a break. I don't see how seeing a picture of a child you don't know and has no baring on you IRL needs a warning. Women aren't exempt to losses or IF, after having a child.
Not going to lie, it took me forever to realize this was C&P from the TFAS post and not this one.
More coffee, please.
Exactly. Plus, correct me if I'm wrong, but most of those ladies demanding this haven't even been trying for a year. Major eyerollz.
Priss28King is wise.--"Lurky, you are so mean... but always so on point!"
Abraham Arthur 2/21/10 // Asher Kendall 11/11/11
I didn't have a problem with pictures or tickers on TTCAL. I always gave a warning when I was PgAL if I went to TTCAL because that was the "rule" of the board. Rule is the right term, but I can't think of what word I want to use. I also give a warning if I'm responding to a late loss question on the m/c/loss board.
I thought she did that months ago. Is this a passive agressive gbcb?
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha :deep breath: hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
That is awesome.
"It's a child, not a cheeto" Thanks mmariluh!
"Ew. I've read all of two posts from you, and you stink like rotting garbage."
Niiiiiiiiiiiice. Again. TTC this month must give her an Easter EDD.
This is/was my issue with TTCAL- if you are at a place to start trying again why is it you can't deal with tickers or pictures? Are you only going to be okay with yourself being the one getting pregnant? No one else?
"It's a child, not a cheeto" Thanks mmariluh!
"Ew. I've read all of two posts from you, and you stink like rotting garbage."
I get what you're saying but I guess I just understand ticker warnings more on those boards. I post on 3T (and the IF board occasionally) and tickers don't bother me and I don't see a need for warnings but I can somewhat understand people thinking it would be a good idea to PUT a ticker warning on those boards, not necessarily for people to expect them - if that makes any sense.
I haven't seen her post on TB in forever. The last time I really even heard her mentioned was a few months ago when she was involved in a board war between two off boards.
Abraham Arthur 2/21/10 // Asher Kendall 11/11/11
Yeah, they are on a baby board. They should expect them without warnings. They shouldn't leave their house if they don't want ot see children or babies. No one is going to warn them there is a baby about to enter the store or be on the next aisle.
Personally, I think they are all BSC. When I came on TB after my miscarriage, I loved seeing the baby pics people had up. This isn't going to come out right, but seeing a baby pic and a note remembering a loss gave me hope. It meant that others had gone through what I was going through and they not only survived, but got pregnant and had a healthy baby afterwards. I just don't get their "if I can't have one, no one should and don't show it if you do" attitude and the constant rules.
I felt the same way.