I guess they felt it was an accident. she is not going to have an easy life. She has destroyed her family. I wonder what her sentence will be for the gulty verdicts?
How was her trying to cover up the fact that the baby was gone for a month not a giant red flag!? I"m so shocked and disgusted by the verdict. All she did was lie and lie and lie. This is ridiculous. So who killed that poor little girl? This is horrible.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
February Siggy Challenge: Neil Patrick Harris from Dougie Howser
So did they not find her guilty of a lesser or charge or would there be another trial for that? What exactly did they say? One of the news channels last night said she could still get up to 33 years if convicted of the other charges.
I thought when they came to a decision that quickly it was going to be guilty for sure.
Started TTC 11/07
BFP 09/24/08
Miscarriage 09/30/08
First cycle of clomid August 09
Second cycle of clomid September 09
BFP 09/30/09
Miscarriage 10/10/09
Three more rounds of clomid and no success
Diagnosed with Unexplained Infertility
Abnormal Bleeding for 3 months resulted in D&C but results were normal
November 2010 100mg clomid but didn't respond
December 2010 forced break for a cyst
February 2011 150mg clomid but still no response
March 2011 250mg clomid and responded! Ovidrel trigger shot and IUI on March 31 Beta #1 11dpo: 27 Beta #2 15dpo: 85 Beta #3 18dpo 276
It really makes me sick. I was just sitting here looking at the screen thinking, you've got to be kidding me. That poor little girl, I feel so bad for her.
I am shocked, disgusted, and angry. I had no doubt in my mind that she did it...none whatsoever. WTF is wrong with the juror's? How is she going to walk FREE. I don't get it.
So did they not find her guilty of a lesser or charge or would there be another trial for that? What exactly did they say? One of the news channels last night said she could still get up to 33 years if convicted of the other charges.
I thought when they came to a decision that quickly it was going to be guilty for sure.
She was found guilty on 4 counts of providing false information to a law enforcement officer. Sentencing is set for 9am Tuesday (I think, or is it Thursday?)
February Siggy Challenge: Neil Patrick Harris from Dougie Howser
Nancy Grace just said a maximum of 4 years for the charges of lying to police but that she probably will only serve a year of it and then walk free.
Regardless of how the defense did or how the prosecution did....I think people are pissed that there is no justice for this little girl. We have no answers to who killed an innocent child.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
I agree. While I believe she is guilty I just feel like there wasn't anything that made it 100% other than gut feeling.
Started TTC 11/07
BFP 09/24/08
Miscarriage 09/30/08
First cycle of clomid August 09
Second cycle of clomid September 09
BFP 09/30/09
Miscarriage 10/10/09
Three more rounds of clomid and no success
Diagnosed with Unexplained Infertility
Abnormal Bleeding for 3 months resulted in D&C but results were normal
November 2010 100mg clomid but didn't respond
December 2010 forced break for a cyst
February 2011 150mg clomid but still no response
March 2011 250mg clomid and responded! Ovidrel trigger shot and IUI on March 31 Beta #1 11dpo: 27 Beta #2 15dpo: 85 Beta #3 18dpo 276
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
I agree. They would have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that she did it. Meaning, there is no other plausible explanation for what happened. I wouldn't want a justice system any other way. This prevents innocent people from being convicted of crimes they didn't commit.
DS 12/18/2011 DD 8/28/2014 DD 5/24/2016, stillborn at 40 weeks
This just makes me absolutely sick to my stomach. That poor little Caylee will never get any justice. It can't just be hormones for the reason I'm crying. I hope Casey rots in hell.
IVF #1: 4-11-11= Transferred 1 beautiful blastocyst I named "Nugget" 5 Snowbabies! Beta#1 4/21= BFP! 226; Beta#2 4/25= 944 DS born 12/14/11
Baby #2 FET Nov/Dec 2013
12/13 Beta#1=BFP 349; 12/16 Beta#2=1,089. First ultrasound 12/26. DS#2 born 8/8/14 ~~PAIF/SAIF Always Welcome~~
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
I agree. While I believe she is guilty I just feel like there wasn't anything that made it 100% other than gut feeling.
Agreed, I do think she is guilty the prosecution just didn't have the evidence to support it...still makes me sick either way.
TTGP March siggy challenge - a famous woman who inspires me. Married Oct. 2008
E - Born December 22, 2011
TTC #2
What is the defense saying about Caylee being found buried near the Anthony home with duct tape over her mouth? I'm not saying I agree or disagree, I just don't know how they explained that.
I know the defense is saying Caylee drowned in the family pool...so what's the explanation for the burial???? wtf???
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
I agree. While I believe she is guilty I just feel like there wasn't anything that made it 100% other than gut feeling.
Agreed, I do think she is guilty the prosecution just didn't have the evidence to support it...still makes me sick either way.
This is all true (I have no doubt she did it). I think her mother is part of what cost the case, the prosecution had no real evidence, etc. BUT, what kind of jury comes back UNANIMOUS after 12 hours with not guilty. I am sickened by the jury.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Nancy Grace just said a maximum of 4 years for the charges of lying to police but that she probably will only serve a year of it and then walk free.
Regardless of how the defense did or how the prosecution did....I think people are pissed that there is no justice for this little girl. We have no answers to who killed an innocent child.
I totally agree that there has been no justice for the baby; but I have a feeling someone else will end up on trial before too long. I can't see them letting this case go cold with no answers whatsoever. Especially since it's so high profile. All of America (and Canada) will be pressuring them to find the person who did this to the baby.
February Siggy Challenge: Neil Patrick Harris from Dougie Howser
I am not shocked, i never felt there was any real evidence proving it was her. She is as guilty as the day is long.
She will not serve a day in jail. She will get credit for time served, and they are misdemeanor, punishable with a max of 1 yr in jail, they may give her the max, but i doubt it
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
I'm in your boat here. From what I watched of the trial, it was a bit of a 3-ring circus. I don't fully agree on the defense portion, though I didn't see their presentations, just the cross-examinations of the prosecuting witnesses. Baez came off as if he was plucking at any threads he could and misinterpreting the points made in hopes of throwing the jury off. But no, the prosecution did not provide the concrete evidence necessary to convict Casey beyond reasonable doubt.
Do I believe Casey was guilty? To some extent. If she didn't kill her child something else was definitely going on to make her lie and hide the disappearance of Caylee. Her not testifying does raise my eyebrow.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
This. I don't think there's a doubt in anyone's mind that she did it, but the prosecution didn't prove it. I told DH yesterday that she'd be found not guilty. It's really, really sad.
We did not watch the trial and have been loosely following it, but with the jury coming to a decision that quickly, the prosecution must not have proved a strong case. It was hardly any deliberation at all for a monumental case. My DH is an attorney and he said she will receive less than 4 years and time already served counts towards that time. I just want to know what happened to that poor little girl! Karma is a b*tch!
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
I tend to agree w/ you. Granted, I think she's guilty and deserves so much worse than what she'll get, but the prosecution didn't prove it. It's a tragedy, but I can't fault the jury.
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
I agree. While I believe she is guilty I just feel like there wasn't anything that made it 100% other than gut feeling.
Agreed, I do think she is guilty the prosecution just didn't have the evidence to support it...still makes me sick either way.
This is all true (I have no doubt she did it). I think her mother is part of what cost the case, the prosecution had no real evidence, etc. BUT, what kind of jury comes back UNANIMOUS after 12 hours with not guilty. I am sickened by the jury.
What were they supposed to do? Sit there and twiddle their thumbs for another 24 hours to appear sufficiently "torn"? There was not enough concrete evidence to persuade the jury that there was no explanation for the death of this child other than murder by Casey. It is still possible that Caley drowned, and that Casey was scared of the repercussions, and so did not report it. It is also possible that she was happy her daughter died, but that doesn't make her a murderer in the first degree (a sick psycho, yes; a murderer, no.) It was clear as day that the prosecution had nothing linking Casey to any act that involved Casey's death - that's not the jury's fault, and the jurors shouldn't have to put on a show to satisfy the public. Their task is hard enough as is.
Yes - I have a gut feeling that Casey was involved in some way with her daughter's death. In our country, though, our gut feelings are not enough to convict a person of any crime, and I thank goodness for that.
i'm at a loss for words over the verdict. but i keep thinking that maybe, much like a lot of people i wanted Casey Anthony to be guilty so Caylee can get justice. so maybe our judgment is clouded by that want. but it's undeniable that Casey Anthony knows something she's not telling to save her ass or someone else.
Regardless of whether or not she really did it (we can't know for sure), I still was physically ill to watch the defense team celebrating, to hear the one defense attorney scolding the country/media for "media assassination", Jose Baez saying that this assassination shows how we don't care about the Constitution (uhhh, what about free speech?) and watching her laugh and smile - regardless of being found not guilty, your daughter is still dead and there is no justice for her. Ugh, just makes me sick.
There is something wrong with our judicial system...
No, there's not. The judicial system worked the way it is supposed to. The burden of proof was on the prosecution (innocent until proven guilty). They failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Would you rather be presume guilty until proven innocent?
Re: Casey Anthony - Not Guilty
I am disappointed because I really believe she is guilty. I wonder what her life will be like now?
i am absolutely disgusted and pissed.
Now this little baby died and apparently it's at NO ONE'S hand? Who the fvck do they think did it? Damnn people are so stupid. UGH. This makes me sick
I guess they felt it was an accident. she is not going to have an easy life. She has destroyed her family. I wonder what her sentence will be for the gulty verdicts?
I'm sure I may be in the minority here but I honestly think the prosecution failed to prove that she actually did it. I'm not saying whether or not I think she did, but the prosecution was very sketchy in proving such. Alternatively, the defending attorney did a good job at making the prosecution look week. Like it or not, I agree with the jury.
So did they not find her guilty of a lesser or charge or would there be another trial for that? What exactly did they say? One of the news channels last night said she could still get up to 33 years if convicted of the other charges.
I thought when they came to a decision that quickly it was going to be guilty for sure.
I am in shock.
What a deplorable excuse for a human being, and now she is getting off practically free.
Breastfeeding and pregnant!
I am shocked, disgusted, and angry. I had no doubt in my mind that she did it...none whatsoever. WTF is wrong with the juror's? How is she going to walk FREE. I don't get it.
She was found guilty on 4 counts of providing false information to a law enforcement officer. Sentencing is set for 9am Tuesday (I think, or is it Thursday?)
Nancy Grace just said a maximum of 4 years for the charges of lying to police but that she probably will only serve a year of it and then walk free.
Regardless of how the defense did or how the prosecution did....I think people are pissed that there is no justice for this little girl. We have no answers to who killed an innocent child.
I agree. While I believe she is guilty I just feel like there wasn't anything that made it 100% other than gut feeling.
They are saying she might not get any jail time because the guilty charges are misdemeanors.
So now there will be a movie I am sure!!!
I agree. They would have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that she did it. Meaning, there is no other plausible explanation for what happened. I wouldn't want a justice system any other way. This prevents innocent people from being convicted of crimes they didn't commit.
DD 8/28/2014
DD 5/24/2016, stillborn at 40 weeks
IVF #1: 4-11-11= Transferred 1 beautiful blastocyst I named "Nugget"
5 Snowbabies! Beta#1 4/21= BFP! 226; Beta#2 4/25= 944
DS born 12/14/11
Baby #2 FET Nov/Dec 2013
12/13 Beta#1=BFP 349; 12/16 Beta#2=1,089. First ultrasound 12/26. DS#2 born 8/8/14



~~PAIF/SAIF Always Welcome~~
Agreed, I do think she is guilty the prosecution just didn't have the evidence to support it...still makes me sick either way.
TTGP March siggy challenge - a famous woman who inspires me.
Married Oct. 2008
E - Born December 22, 2011
TTC #2
What is the defense saying about Caylee being found buried near the Anthony home with duct tape over her mouth? I'm not saying I agree or disagree, I just don't know how they explained that.
I know the defense is saying Caylee drowned in the family pool...so what's the explanation for the burial???? wtf???
There is something wrong with our judicial system...
Un-fvcking-real.
This is all true (I have no doubt she did it). I think her mother is part of what cost the case, the prosecution had no real evidence, etc. BUT, what kind of jury comes back UNANIMOUS after 12 hours with not guilty. I am sickened by the jury.
I totally agree that there has been no justice for the baby; but I have a feeling someone else will end up on trial before too long. I can't see them letting this case go cold with no answers whatsoever. Especially since it's so high profile. All of America (and Canada) will be pressuring them to find the person who did this to the baby.
I am not shocked, i never felt there was any real evidence proving it was her. She is as guilty as the day is long.
She will not serve a day in jail. She will get credit for time served, and they are misdemeanor, punishable with a max of 1 yr in jail, they may give her the max, but i doubt it
*~ My Blog ~*
I'm in your boat here. From what I watched of the trial, it was a bit of a 3-ring circus. I don't fully agree on the defense portion, though I didn't see their presentations, just the cross-examinations of the prosecuting witnesses. Baez came off as if he was plucking at any threads he could and misinterpreting the points made in hopes of throwing the jury off. But no, the prosecution did not provide the concrete evidence necessary to convict Casey beyond reasonable doubt.
Do I believe Casey was guilty? To some extent. If she didn't kill her child something else was definitely going on to make her lie and hide the disappearance of Caylee. Her not testifying does raise my eyebrow.
This. I don't think there's a doubt in anyone's mind that she did it, but the prosecution didn't prove it. I told DH yesterday that she'd be found not guilty. It's really, really sad.
I tend to agree w/ you. Granted, I think she's guilty and deserves so much worse than what she'll get, but the prosecution didn't prove it. It's a tragedy, but I can't fault the jury.
What were they supposed to do? Sit there and twiddle their thumbs for another 24 hours to appear sufficiently "torn"? There was not enough concrete evidence to persuade the jury that there was no explanation for the death of this child other than murder by Casey. It is still possible that Caley drowned, and that Casey was scared of the repercussions, and so did not report it. It is also possible that she was happy her daughter died, but that doesn't make her a murderer in the first degree (a sick psycho, yes; a murderer, no.) It was clear as day that the prosecution had nothing linking Casey to any act that involved Casey's death - that's not the jury's fault, and the jurors shouldn't have to put on a show to satisfy the public. Their task is hard enough as is.
Yes - I have a gut feeling that Casey was involved in some way with her daughter's death. In our country, though, our gut feelings are not enough to convict a person of any crime, and I thank goodness for that.
No, there's not. The judicial system worked the way it is supposed to. The burden of proof was on the prosecution (innocent until proven guilty). They failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Would you rather be presume guilty until proven innocent?