Babies: 3 - 6 Months

Maybe politically incorrect - regarding WIC abuse

So while I was talking about food to a friend of mine, she mentioned that she gets WIC to cover most of her food expenses. She had a baby with her boyfriend  whom she lives with. Of course, she applied as a "single" Mom. He makes a decent income fixing up retro cars. Most of it goes unclaimed. She quit working when she was 38 weeks pregnant. She managed to get unemployment benefits by claiming that the workplace did not have a suitable location for her to work normal hours. (She frigging QUIT a$$holes, she was given an opportunity to keep the job!) She then applied for a grant for school and got 4k from unemployment. It gets better, she texted me today asking what color she should dye her hair. She also complained that after BFing, her breasts deflate and that she can't decide whether to get saline or silicone implants when she weans. So she has 10 gees of disposable income to get new tits. Bravo for working it girl!

Here is naive ol' me, working PT while my husband slaves away crazy hours  commuting 3 hours back and forth to the city. The reason I only work two days is because those are the days my Mom and Grandmother watch LO for free. We can't afford FT daycare. I would even figure something out if I could get a FT job teaching Art right now. Luckily, I stashed away enough money from another job to last for another year. We pay for our own mortgage, clothes, food and are both paying off school loans. Once in a while, I splurge on wholesome food by shopping at Trader Joes or WF. In the meantime, this broad is shopping there too with her WIC card. Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

This sh!t just makes my blood boil. I can only imagine how many unwed mommies are milking the system the same way as my buddy here. The system needs reform - big time. There should be a way for them to keep tabs on the applicants' spending. If they are buying Frye boots and getting boob jobs, perhaps they may not qualify for these handouts?

Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
«1

Re: Maybe politically incorrect - regarding WIC abuse

  • I hear you.When I announced I was pregnant I got laid off.We coulnd't afford cobra so I applied for Medicaid and was denied.They looked at H's income but not our bills.So they see what we make but not what we pay out.Someone actually told me to say we were getting divorced and I live alone.I decided just to figure a way to pay out of pocket.It was hard but we did it.

    It does annoy me that people get it who do not need it and people who need it are SOL.

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • Loading the player...
  • Wow! Cheating the government and bragging about it, she sounds klassy. Way to "stick it to the man" :(
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I'd be tempted to turn her asss in.
    imageimage
  • Unless she's living on bread, eggs, milk, peanut butter, cheese and juice, I think "most of my food expenses" is an exaggeration.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • My favorite are the goddamn daycare vouchers driving up the cost of daycare. That's why daycare is more than my rent payment and I can't afford to keep working. Thanks state government!

    Lilypie First Birthday tickersLilypie Third Birthday tickers
      Francesca Pearl is here!             Josephine Hope is almost 3!
  • wait, are you talking about WIC or Welfare? (either way it's pretty shady of your friend to abuse the system like that)

    You can't buy whatever you want with WIC, you get about 3 checks a month for specific food items, and even then you can only choose the least expensive brand. 

    I'm not trying to flame, just in need of some clarification

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Ugh I hate people like that, they make those who need it look bad!  WIC helped me out so much when I had DD#1 and was still in college.  It got me through that time and now I don't need it!  Sometimes the system works, sometimes. 
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    imageimage 

    image

    Unable to even.  

    ********************

    You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK.  Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.



  • Well you should report her because it's not fair that she is abusing the system like that when others may need it. I applied for wic and only recieved it once my dh was laid off of his job. only to find out that they will not give me funds for her formula nutramigen because my DD only will drink ready to use and the wic representative told me that ready to use formula is only for people in the shelter! wth so how am i suppose to feed my child she told me she doesnt know! needless to say i was paying for formula,rent and other bills on just savings. now thank God DH has another job so we ca pay for formula with no problem.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageConniebird:

    wait, are you talking about WIC or Welfare? (either way it's pretty shady of your friend to abuse the system like that)

    You can't buy whatever you want with WIC, you get about 3 checks a month for specific food items, and even then you can only choose the least expensive brand. 

    This. You don't get enough on WIC to live off of. The biggest bonus of WIC is the free formula. Either way, she is definitely cheating the system.

  • Oh girl! Let me try to top this. I know a couple, who are married. She got pregnant, quit her job, smoked her whole pregnancy, had a preemie baby (swearing the dr's told her smoking had nothing to do with it), so because the baby had problems, she gets an ssi check every month (which now she has even says "I shouldn't even be getting this check because she's fine now")...on top of getting WIC and is on sooner care (which is a state paid medical insurance so she pays NOTHING out of pocket for ANYTHING!). Now, keep in mind...she is MARRIED. But I guess here in good ol Oklahoma, you only have to reapply every 3 years so they have no clue she is married. To add to all of this, her husband got laid off. Instead of looking for another job, they lived off our tax dollars and his unemployment and started a pot growing business (NO FREAKIN LIE!) so now all they do is sit around, and pretty much get paid to smoke pot all day. Talk about wanting to turn someone in!!!!
  • imageParisLynn16:
    Oh girl! Let me try to top this. I know a couple, who are married. She got pregnant, quit her job, smoked her whole pregnancy, had a preemie baby (swearing the dr's told her smoking had nothing to do with it), so because the baby had problems, she gets an ssi check every month (which now she has even says "I shouldn't even be getting this check because she's fine now")...on top of getting WIC and is on sooner care (which is a state paid medical insurance so she pays NOTHING out of pocket for ANYTHING!). Now, keep in mind...she is MARRIED. But I guess here in good ol Oklahoma, you only have to reapply every 3 years so they have no clue she is married. To add to all of this, her husband got laid off. Instead of looking for another job, they lived off our tax dollars and his unemployment and started a pot growing business (NO FREAKIN LIE!) so now all they do is sit around, and pretty much get paid to smoke pot all day. Talk about wanting to turn someone in!!!!

    Indifferent

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagecinema_goddess:

    I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    IMO - No. Here's an analogy. Some of us can afford a benz, others a ford focus. You get what's suitable to your income. The same should apply for food. Why should I have to shop at any of the above mentioned generic stores with my hard earned cash while she gets the luxury of getting her cage-free eggs, unpasteurized OJ and organic peanut butter at trader joes without having to lift a finger? It's bullsh!t.

     

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageConniebird:

    imageParisLynn16:
    Oh girl! Let me try to top this. I know a couple, who are married. She got pregnant, quit her job, smoked her whole pregnancy, had a preemie baby (swearing the dr's told her smoking had nothing to do with it), so because the baby had problems, she gets an ssi check every month (which now she has even says "I shouldn't even be getting this check because she's fine now")...on top of getting WIC and is on sooner care (which is a state paid medical insurance so she pays NOTHING out of pocket for ANYTHING!). Now, keep in mind...she is MARRIED. But I guess here in good ol Oklahoma, you only have to reapply every 3 years so they have no clue she is married. To add to all of this, her husband got laid off. Instead of looking for another job, they lived off our tax dollars and his unemployment and started a pot growing business (NO FREAKIN LIE!) so now all they do is sit around, and pretty much get paid to smoke pot all day. Talk about wanting to turn someone in!!!!

    Indifferent

    Seriously! It's shocking isn't it?! The ONLY reason I do not turn them in is because that baby is hardly ever there and I know the family and how bad it would devestate them if she was taken from them.

  • imageParisLynn16:
    Oh girl! Let me try to top this. I know a couple, who are married. She got pregnant, quit her job, smoked her whole pregnancy, had a preemie baby (swearing the dr's told her smoking had nothing to do with it), so because the baby had problems, she gets an ssi check every month (which now she has even says "I shouldn't even be getting this check because she's fine now")...on top of getting WIC and is on sooner care (which is a state paid medical insurance so she pays NOTHING out of pocket for ANYTHING!). Now, keep in mind...she is MARRIED. But I guess here in good ol Oklahoma, you only have to reapply every 3 years so they have no clue she is married. To add to all of this, her husband got laid off. Instead of looking for another job, they lived off our tax dollars and his unemployment and started a pot growing business (NO FREAKIN LIE!) so now all they do is sit around, and pretty much get paid to smoke pot all day. Talk about wanting to turn someone in!!!!

    Whoa, I thought Jersey was bad. Oklahoma sounds amazing - I should tell my friend to move there. I guess we have it pretty strict here - they only reward single Moms. Married couples have to fend for themselves. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageYules:
    imagecinema_goddess:

    I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    IMO - No. Here's an analogy. Some of us can afford a benz, others a ford focus. You get what's suitable to your income. The same should apply for food. Why should I have to shop at any of the above mentioned generic stores with my hard earned cash while she gets the luxury of getting her cage-free eggs, unpasteurized OJ and organic peanut butter at trader joes without having to lift a finger? It's bullsh!t.


     

    I could not agree more! It's a tad bit ridiculous when you go somewhere like Papa Murphy's and in the window it says "Food Stamps Accepted Here." (I don't know if Papa Murphy's accepts them but I know I've seen places like that with those signs.) Are you kidding me?!

  • imageYules:

    imageParisLynn16:
    Oh girl! Let me try to top this. I know a couple, who are married. She got pregnant, quit her job, smoked her whole pregnancy, had a preemie baby (swearing the dr's told her smoking had nothing to do with it), so because the baby had problems, she gets an ssi check every month (which now she has even says "I shouldn't even be getting this check because she's fine now")...on top of getting WIC and is on sooner care (which is a state paid medical insurance so she pays NOTHING out of pocket for ANYTHING!). Now, keep in mind...she is MARRIED. But I guess here in good ol Oklahoma, you only have to reapply every 3 years so they have no clue she is married. To add to all of this, her husband got laid off. Instead of looking for another job, they lived off our tax dollars and his unemployment and started a pot growing business (NO FREAKIN LIE!) so now all they do is sit around, and pretty much get paid to smoke pot all day. Talk about wanting to turn someone in!!!!

    Whoa, I thought Jersey was bad. Oklahoma sounds amazing - I should tell my friend to move there. I guess we have it pretty strict here - they only reward single Moms. Married couples have to fend for themselves. 

    They don't know she's married because she wasn't when she applied and they only have to re apply every 3 years. She's still got 2 to go until they MIGHT find out she's married.

  • imageYules:
    imagecinema_goddess:

    I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    IMO - No. Here's an analogy. Some of us can afford a benz, others a ford focus. You get what's suitable to your income. The same should apply for food. Why should I have to shop at any of the above mentioned generic stores with my hard earned cash while she gets the luxury of getting her cage-free eggs, unpasteurized OJ and organic peanut butter at trader joes without having to lift a finger? It's bullsh!t.


     

    Assuming this broad wasn't a complete jackasses - Should people of lower incomes be able to provide their child(ren) with good non-hormone-laden foods, even if they can't "afford" it with a paying job?  When we start saying "Only wonder bread and last week's carrots for the poor!", we start punishing children for their parent's misfortune. 

    imageimage 

    image

    Unable to even.  

    ********************

    You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK.  Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.



  • imagecinema_goddess:
    imageYules:
    imagecinema_goddess:

    I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    IMO - No. Here's an analogy. Some of us can afford a benz, others a ford focus. You get what's suitable to your income. The same should apply for food. Why should I have to shop at any of the above mentioned generic stores with my hard earned cash while she gets the luxury of getting her cage-free eggs, unpasteurized OJ and organic peanut butter at trader joes without having to lift a finger? It's bullsh!t.


     

    Assuming this broad wasn't a complete jackasses - Should people of lower incomes be able to provide their child(ren) with good non-hormone-laden foods, even if they can't "afford" it with a paying job?  When we start saying "Only wonder bread and last week's carrots for the poor!", we start punishing children for their parent's misfortune. 

    Looking at it that way, you're right. It just sucks that some people manipulate the system when others who really might need the help can't get it.

  • imageParisLynn16:
    Oh girl! Let me try to top this. I know a couple, who are married. She got pregnant, quit her job, smoked her whole pregnancy, had a preemie baby (swearing the dr's told her smoking had nothing to do with it), so because the baby had problems, she gets an ssi check every month (which now she has even says "I shouldn't even be getting this check because she's fine now")...on top of getting WIC and is on sooner care (which is a state paid medical insurance so she pays NOTHING out of pocket for ANYTHING!). Now, keep in mind...she is MARRIED. But I guess here in good ol Oklahoma, you only have to reapply every 3 years so they have no clue she is married. To add to all of this, her husband got laid off. Instead of looking for another job, they lived off our tax dollars and his unemployment and started a pot growing business (NO FREAKIN LIE!) so now all they do is sit around, and pretty much get paid to smoke pot all day. Talk about wanting to turn someone in!!!!

    Do it.

  • Wow, these stories seriously upset me.  I had people tell me to apply for WIC - "just to see if you qualify".  Ummm, DH makes enough to support us w/o relying on others, so why should I even try to screw the system?  It's those people who are going to ruin what should be a good program. 

    Cinema: I agree that high-end places should be considered luxury because if you are poor enough to receive government money (MY money), I want to know you are using it to fill your kids' bellies with plenty of healthy items.  If I gave a homeless guy $20 bucks, shouldn't he stretch it as much as possible since it's someone else's had earned money and he has none of his own?  I'd be pissed if I saw him walk into a steakhouse with that $20 when he could have eaten for 3, 4, or even more days on that.  I can't afford a lot of luxury items either, and I sure as hell don't expect other people to buy them for me.    I might be able to understand a rare splurge as a special treat, but that's not what what Yules was describing.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    image

  • imagesoontobeabrown:
    Well you should report her because it's not fair that she is abusing the system like that when others may need it. I applied for wic and only recieved it once my dh was laid off of his job. only to find out that they will not give me funds for her formula nutramigen because my DD only will drink ready to use and the wic representative told me that ready to use formula is only for people in the shelter! wth so how am i suppose to feed my child she told me she doesnt know! needless to say i was paying for formula,rent and other bills on just savings. now thank God DH has another job so we ca pay for formula with no problem.

    That's BS.  I very much doubt your daughter would have starved herself to death if you continued to offer her mixed formula.

    Photobucket

    Bar tab = $156,000, Bus to Foxwoods = $0, Puking in the Stanley Cup = Priceless

  • imageAnanke:

    Cinema: I agree that high-end places should be considered luxury because if you are poor enough to receive government money (MY money), I want to know you are using it to fill your kids' bellies with plenty of healthy items.  If I gave a homeless guy $20 bucks, shouldn't he stretch it as much as possible since it's someone else's had earned money and he has none of his own?  I'd be pissed if I saw him walk into a steakhouse with that $20 when he could have eaten for 3, 4, or even more days on that.  I can't afford a lot of luxury items either, and I sure as hell don't expect other people to buy them for me.    I might be able to understand a rare splurge as a special treat, but that's not what what Yules was describing.

    Again, that's not the child's fault.  WIC isn't only for mothers but for mothers and children.  The produce markets around here are taking WIC and EBT cards.  The markets are chock full of organic produce, fresh baked breads and other "luxury" items. 

    I have a hard time telling a child that they can't have good foods for themselves because their parents have fallen on hard times. 

    imageimage 

    image

    Unable to even.  

    ********************

    You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK.  Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.



  • imagecinema_goddess:
    imageYules:
    imagecinema_goddess:

    I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    IMO - No. Here's an analogy. Some of us can afford a benz, others a ford focus. You get what's suitable to your income. The same should apply for food. Why should I have to shop at any of the above mentioned generic stores with my hard earned cash while she gets the luxury of getting her cage-free eggs, unpasteurized OJ and organic peanut butter at trader joes without having to lift a finger? It's bullsh!t.


     

    Assuming this broad wasn't a complete jackasses - Should people of lower incomes be able to provide their child(ren) with good non-hormone-laden foods, even if they can't "afford" it with a paying job?  When we start saying "Only wonder bread and last week's carrots for the poor!", we start punishing children for their parent's misfortune. 

    I would agree except there are healthy options at places like Walmart and regular grocery stores.  It's not necessary to shop at a specialty store to eat healthy.  And rather than spending $10 for that loaf of organic, imported 500 grain bread at the specialty store, that same $10 could buy a loaf of whole wheat store brand bread, a gallon of milk, and some deli meat or veggies.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    image

  • imageAnanke:
    imagecinema_goddess:
    imageYules:
    imagecinema_goddess:

    I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    IMO - No. Here's an analogy. Some of us can afford a benz, others a ford focus. You get what's suitable to your income. The same should apply for food. Why should I have to shop at any of the above mentioned generic stores with my hard earned cash while she gets the luxury of getting her cage-free eggs, unpasteurized OJ and organic peanut butter at trader joes without having to lift a finger? It's bullsh!t.


     

    Assuming this broad wasn't a complete jackasses - Should people of lower incomes be able to provide their child(ren) with good non-hormone-laden foods, even if they can't "afford" it with a paying job?  When we start saying "Only wonder bread and last week's carrots for the poor!", we start punishing children for their parent's misfortune. 

    I would agree except there are healthy options at places like Walmart and regular grocery stores.  It's not necessary to shop at a specialty store to eat healthy.  And rather than spending $10 for that loaf of organic, imported 500 grain bread at the specialty store, that same $10 could buy a loaf of whole wheat store brand bread, a gallon of milk, and some deli meat or veggies.

    I never said it was necessary.  They should have the option to go there.  If they choose somewhere with cheaper items, more power to them.  If they prefer to shop at Trader Joe's or another similar store, more power to them. 

     

    imageimage 

    image

    Unable to even.  

    ********************

    You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK.  Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.



  • imagecinema_goddess:
    imageAnanke:

    Cinema: I agree that high-end places should be considered luxury because if you are poor enough to receive government money (MY money), I want to know you are using it to fill your kids' bellies with plenty of healthy items.  If I gave a homeless guy $20 bucks, shouldn't he stretch it as much as possible since it's someone else's had earned money and he has none of his own?  I'd be pissed if I saw him walk into a steakhouse with that $20 when he could have eaten for 3, 4, or even more days on that.  I can't afford a lot of luxury items either, and I sure as hell don't expect other people to buy them for me.    I might be able to understand a rare splurge as a special treat, but that's not what what Yules was describing.

    Again, that's not the child's fault.  WIC isn't only for mothers but for mothers and children.  The produce markets around here are taking WIC and EBT cards.  The markets are chock full of organic produce, fresh baked breads and other "luxury" items. 

    I have a hard time telling a child that they can't have good foods for themselves because their parents have fallen on hard times. 

    I wouldn't mind WIC recipients using their benefits at higher quality stores, but only if it's based on a fixed dollar amount. I also agree that most large chains have healthy options readily available.

  • Ok I have one for you all to chew on then.My SO ex is a real piece of work. Not only does she get WIC, she gets food stamps, welfare $ every month, Medi-Cal and SSI. She has 6...yes 6 kids, but only custody of 3 of them. (Dr. took her to court to force her to get her tubes tied..I shiit you not!) She walked out on the other 3,doesn't provide for the other 3 AT ALL, because she 'doesn't have any money'. She has a live in boyfriend that doesn't work, always has new clothes, smokes and beer in the house. When we asked her to start paying something for the 2 kids we have custody of, she told us to apply for SSI because one of the children has ADD. Every single person in her family is living off the system, no jobs at all. I agree that there needs to stricter guidelines!!
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagecinema_goddess:
    imageAnanke:
    imagecinema_goddess:
    imageYules:
    imagecinema_goddess:

    I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    IMO - No. Here's an analogy. Some of us can afford a benz, others a ford focus. You get what's suitable to your income. The same should apply for food. Why should I have to shop at any of the above mentioned generic stores with my hard earned cash while she gets the luxury of getting her cage-free eggs, unpasteurized OJ and organic peanut butter at trader joes without having to lift a finger? It's bullsh!t.


     

    Assuming this broad wasn't a complete jackasses - Should people of lower incomes be able to provide their child(ren) with good non-hormone-laden foods, even if they can't "afford" it with a paying job?  When we start saying "Only wonder bread and last week's carrots for the poor!", we start punishing children for their parent's misfortune. 

    I would agree except there are healthy options at places like Walmart and regular grocery stores.  It's not necessary to shop at a specialty store to eat healthy.  And rather than spending $10 for that loaf of organic, imported 500 grain bread at the specialty store, that same $10 could buy a loaf of whole wheat store brand bread, a gallon of milk, and some deli meat or veggies.

    I never said it was necessary.  They should have the option to go there.  If they choose somewhere with cheaper items, more power to them.  If they prefer to shop at Trader Joe's or another similar store, more power to them. 

     

    I see your point.  I think my issue is that some people (please don't think I feel this way about all or even most poor people) is that they are not responsible enough to have the option of shopping in a more expensive place.  Instead of using their government funds to buy a week's worth of food, they blow it in these specialty shops for a single day and then have nothing left to feed their kids with.  That isn't fair for the responsible parents, but those aren't the ones we need to be concerned with: they usually work their butts off to get off the gov't programs so they can provide the luxury items on their own. 

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    image

  • imagecinema_goddess:
    imageAnanke:

    Cinema: I agree that high-end places should be considered luxury because if you are poor enough to receive government money (MY money), I want to know you are using it to fill your kids' bellies with plenty of healthy items.  If I gave a homeless guy $20 bucks, shouldn't he stretch it as much as possible since it's someone else's had earned money and he has none of his own?  I'd be pissed if I saw him walk into a steakhouse with that $20 when he could have eaten for 3, 4, or even more days on that.  I can't afford a lot of luxury items either, and I sure as hell don't expect other people to buy them for me.    I might be able to understand a rare splurge as a special treat, but that's not what what Yules was describing.

    Again, that's not the child's fault.  WIC isn't only for mothers but for mothers and children.  The produce markets around here are taking WIC and EBT cards.  The markets are chock full of organic produce, fresh baked breads and other "luxury" items. 

    I have a hard time telling a child that they can't have good foods for themselves because their parents have fallen on hard times. 

    The problem here is that many working parents have no choice but to tell that to their children. I am a child of an immigrant family where we clipped coupons and bought what was on sale. We had no clue what organic meant and that hormones existed in other places besides body-builders' syringes. Never once did my parents think that they ought to be privy enough to shop otherwise. If we wanted a fresh loaf of good bread, my Mom had to buy the ingredients on sale and bake it herself.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageAnanke:
    imagecinema_goddess:
    imageAnanke:
    imagecinema_goddess:
    imageYules:
    imagecinema_goddess:

    I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    IMO - No. Here's an analogy. Some of us can afford a benz, others a ford focus. You get what's suitable to your income. The same should apply for food. Why should I have to shop at any of the above mentioned generic stores with my hard earned cash while she gets the luxury of getting her cage-free eggs, unpasteurized OJ and organic peanut butter at trader joes without having to lift a finger? It's bullsh!t.


     

    Assuming this broad wasn't a complete jackasses - Should people of lower incomes be able to provide their child(ren) with good non-hormone-laden foods, even if they can't "afford" it with a paying job?  When we start saying "Only wonder bread and last week's carrots for the poor!", we start punishing children for their parent's misfortune. 

    I would agree except there are healthy options at places like Walmart and regular grocery stores.  It's not necessary to shop at a specialty store to eat healthy.  And rather than spending $10 for that loaf of organic, imported 500 grain bread at the specialty store, that same $10 could buy a loaf of whole wheat store brand bread, a gallon of milk, and some deli meat or veggies.

    I never said it was necessary.  They should have the option to go there.  If they choose somewhere with cheaper items, more power to them.  If they prefer to shop at Trader Joe's or another similar store, more power to them. 

     

    I see your point.  I think my issue is that some people (please don't think I feel this way about all or even most poor people) is that they are not responsible enough to have the option of shopping in a more expensive place.  Instead of using their government funds to buy a week's worth of food, they blow it in these specialty shops for a single day and then have nothing left to feed their kids with.  That isn't fair for the responsible parents, but those aren't the ones we need to be concerned with: they usually work their butts off to get off the gov't programs so they can provide the luxury items on their own. 

    This..totally this
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageAnanke:
    imagecinema_goddess:
    imageAnanke:
    imagecinema_goddess:
    imageYules:
    imagecinema_goddess:

    I would like to think that women like this are the exception rather than the rule. 

    Also:

    imageYules:

    Shouldn't these stores be considered a luxury by the government?

    Why?  Because they cost more? I don't understand why they should only be able to buy food at Albertsons/Safeway/Kroger/WalMart or wherever.  If WIC vouchers are accepted there, shouldn't people on WIC be allowed to purchase higher-end items if they want to? 

    IMO - No. Here's an analogy. Some of us can afford a benz, others a ford focus. You get what's suitable to your income. The same should apply for food. Why should I have to shop at any of the above mentioned generic stores with my hard earned cash while she gets the luxury of getting her cage-free eggs, unpasteurized OJ and organic peanut butter at trader joes without having to lift a finger? It's bullsh!t.


     

    Assuming this broad wasn't a complete jackasses - Should people of lower incomes be able to provide their child(ren) with good non-hormone-laden foods, even if they can't "afford" it with a paying job?  When we start saying "Only wonder bread and last week's carrots for the poor!", we start punishing children for their parent's misfortune. 

    I would agree except there are healthy options at places like Walmart and regular grocery stores.  It's not necessary to shop at a specialty store to eat healthy.  And rather than spending $10 for that loaf of organic, imported 500 grain bread at the specialty store, that same $10 could buy a loaf of whole wheat store brand bread, a gallon of milk, and some deli meat or veggies.

    I never said it was necessary.  They should have the option to go there.  If they choose somewhere with cheaper items, more power to them.  If they prefer to shop at Trader Joe's or another similar store, more power to them. 

     

    I see your point.  I think my issue is that some people (please don't think I feel this way about all or even most poor people) is that they are not responsible enough to have the option of shopping in a more expensive place.  Instead of using their government funds to buy a week's worth of food, they blow it in these specialty shops for a single day and then have nothing left to feed their kids with.  That isn't fair for the responsible parents, but those aren't the ones we need to be concerned with: they usually work their butts off to get off the gov't programs so they can provide the luxury items on their own. 

    This..totally this
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • bump fart..sorry
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I'll have to agree to disagree with pretty much everyone in this thread.  I choose to not look at it like people are screwing with the system in order to provide their children with better food.

    And trust me, the food at Traders Joe's is (for the most part) better quality than what you can find at most everywhere else.  Deli meat =/= healthy food. 

    I buy food on sale.  We buy in bulk and freeze a lot.  And if I were ever on WIC or had to use and EBT card, I would be extremely embarrassed and upset to think people were thinking I was a bad parent for wanting to purchase foods from somewhere other than Albertsons.

    And with that I'm done here.

    imageimage 

    image

    Unable to even.  

    ********************

    You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK.  Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.



  • imagepurplemag:
    Ok I have one for you all to chew on then.My SO ex is a real piece of work. Not only does she get WIC, she gets food stamps, welfare $ every month, Medi-Cal and SSI. She has 6...yes 6 kids, but only custody of 3 of them. (Dr. took her to court to force her to get her tubes tied..I shiit you not!) She walked out on the other 3,doesn't provide for the other 3 AT ALL, because she 'doesn't have any money'. She has a live in boyfriend that doesn't work, always has new clothes, smokes and beer in the house. When we asked her to start paying something for the 2 kids we have custody of, she told us to apply for SSI because one of the children has ADD. Every single person in her family is living off the system, no jobs at all. I agree that there needs to stricter guidelines!!

    People are such pieces of shiit! That's the only way to put it!

  • The whole issue with it is not that they are using up a week's worth of food on one loaf of artisan bread. You are given checks for specific items not a check for a certain dollar amount.. So, if they choose to purchase foods at those speciality shops the state is reimbursing more per item than someone who gets their WIC items at Walmart. That drives prices up and allows for unfair competition. It's all about reimbursement. Whole foods can say Ok we'll take WIC and charge $5 to the state gov't for a loaf of bread whereas Walmart only charges $1.50. That puts undue pressure on the state to pay out those reimbursements. That in turn drives up taxes and increases the burden of these programs.

    /rant

    Lilypie First Birthday tickersLilypie Third Birthday tickers
      Francesca Pearl is here!             Josephine Hope is almost 3!
  • imageAnanke:

    I had people tell me to apply for WIC - "just to see if you qualify".  Ummm, DH makes enough to support us w/o relying on others, so why should I even try to screw the system? 

    How are you screwing the system if you qualify? 

    I want to know you are using it to fill your kids' bellies with plenty of healthy items. 

    Um, seriously? You think just because you pay taxes you have the right to dictate how WIC clients use their checks? I'm all for eating healthy but try comparing the cost of making a fresh salad to a box of mac and cheese and see how far your check goes.

    If I gave a homeless guy $20 bucks, shouldn't he stretch it as much as possible since it's someone else's had earned money and he has none of his own? 

    Well, he now has $20 so it's none of your business what he does with HIS money after you give it to him since it isn't yours anymore.

  • where do you live? i live in san diego, and i get wic, but when i signed up they asked if the father was in the picture (were engaged) and they made me tell them his income also. so, its weird to me that they didn't do that for her too.
    Photobucket Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imagegrantierb:
    imageAnanke:

    If I gave a homeless guy $20 bucks, shouldn't he stretch it as much as possible since it's someone else's had earned money and he has none of his own? 

    Well, he now has $20 so it's none of your business what he does with HIS money after you give it to him since it isn't yours anymore.

    If this were a model for any non-profit organization, no one would ever receive any donations. I give you $20 with the intention that you won't spend it all in one place. You absolutely may do what you will with it. If I see you spending it all at a steakhouse, you will never receive another penny from me. It would be fair if WIC worked the same way. Where is the incentive for said person to go out and make their own $20 to spend at a steakhouse. Perhaps if it was earned as opposed to being govmt. gratis, more thought would be put into where this money is applied.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagesrporter89:
    where do you live? i live in san diego, and i get wic, but when i signed up they asked if the father was in the picture (were engaged) and they made me tell them his income also. so, its weird to me that they didn't do that for her too.

    I live in NJ, and my chum here told them she is single. Unfortunately, not everyone using this program is as honest as you.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageYules:
    Perhaps if it was earned as opposed to being govmt. gratis, more thought would be put into where this money is applied.

    Your comment suggests changing the system, not those who use it which was kind of my point - why is everyone so angry that people who use WIC (whether they qualify or not) are shopping in WIC-approved stores - whether WalMart or TJ's? They both accept WIC, right? So why care at which store they spend their checks?

This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"