Austin Babies

NBR: "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is History

At the risk of offending people, I did want to point out that Obama signed the repeal into law.  This is ground breaking and great news!  I'm especially touched by this because of the long standing military service of the men and women of my family (my sister and I are the first generation NOT to join the service.) 

https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/23/us/politics/23military.html?partner=rss&emc=rss


With Obama?s Signature, ?Don?t Ask? Is Repealed

By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

WASHINGTON ? The military?s longstanding ban on service by gays and lesbians came to a historic and symbolic end on Wednesday, as President Obama signed legislation repealing ?don?t ask, don?t tell,? the contentious 17-year old Clinton-era law that sought to allow gays to serve under the terms of an uneasy compromise that required them to keep their sexuality a secret.

?No longer will tens of thousands of Americans in uniform be asked to live a lie or look over their shoulder,? Mr. Obama said during a signing ceremony in a packed auditorium at the Interior Department here. Quoting the chairman of his joint chiefs of staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, Mr. Obama went on, ?Our people sacrifice a lot for their country, including their lives. None of them should have to sacrifice their integrity as well.?

The repeal does not immediately put a stop to ?don?t ask, don?t tell.? Mr. Obama must still certify that changing the law to allow homosexual and bisexual men and women to serve openly in all branches of the military will not harm readiness, as must Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mullen, before the military can implement the new law. But the secretary and the admiral have backed Mr. Obama, who said ending ?don?t ask, don?t tell? was a topic of his first meeting with the men. He praised Mr. Gates for his courage; Admiral Mullen, who was on stage with the president during the signing ceremony here, received a standing ovation.

While there is still significant resistance within the military to the change in policy, especially within the Marine Corps, at least one proponent ? Representative Barney Frank, the openly gay Democrat from Massachusetts ? insisted on Wednesday that this latest effort to integrate the armed services will go more smoothly than did racial or gender integration.

?Reality will very soon make it clear that there is nothing to worry about,? Mr. Frank said. He called the signing the biggest civil rights moment in the nation since the signing of voting rights legislation in the 1960s. ?If you can fight for your country, you can do anything,? he said.

In the years since President Bill Clinton first enacted ?don?t ask, don?t tell? in 1993, some 17,000 service members have been discharged under the policy. While many gay people in the military are now breathing a sigh of relief, the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which represents soldiers facing charges under the policy, is warning its members that they are ?still at risk? because the repeal will not take full effect until 60 days after Mr. Obama, the defense secretary and admiral certify readiness.

?The bottom line is DADT is still in effect and it is not safe to come out,? the organization said.

For Mr. Obama, the ceremony ? held at the Interior Department because the White House is tied up with holiday tours ? marked yet another in a string of last-minute, bipartisan legislative triumphs, a surprising turnaround in the wake of the self-described ?shellacking? his party took at the polls last month. He had already signed a bipartisan tax deal into law, and the Senate appears headed on Wednesday to approve a new nuclear arms pact with Russia, which will give him a significant foreign policy victory as he wraps up the first half of his term. He looked relaxed and upbeat as he soaked up the energy from an enthusiastic crowd.For the gay rights movement, which has been frustrated with the pace of progress under Mr. Obama, Wednesday marked a celebratory turning point. ?Thank you, Mr. President,? someone shouted, as Mr. Obama took the stage, prompting a round of other shouts: ?Chicago?s in the house, Mr. President! You rock, Mr. President!? Mr. Obama pronounced himself overwhelmed.

The audience for the ceremony included a who?s who of gay activists, among them Frank Kameny, who was fired from a civilian job as an Army astronomer in 1957 ? an act that prompted him to found a gay rights advocacy organization in Washington D.C. and to file a lawsuit which went all the way to the Supreme Court. In 1965 he picketed the White House, in the first ever demonstration there by gays.

Now white-haired at 85, Mr. Kameny also served as an enlisted Army soldier; he signed up in May 1943, he said, three days before he turned 18, and saw ?front line combat? in Germany during World War II. He said he was asked if he had ?homosexual tendencies? and denied it. ?They asked, and I didn?t tell,? he said, ?and I resented for 67 years that I had to lie.?

Re: NBR: "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is History

  • Loading the player...
  • I am so excited that this has finally happened!  :)
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I have mixed feelings about this one.  I'll support gay marriage and I think gays should have the same rights as anyone.  And this is definitely a step towards acceptance and moving on. 

    But...well...generally the guys in the military aren't very accepting.  I wonder how well this will be taken throughout the ranks.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageali-1411:

    I have mixed feelings about this one.  I'll support gay marriage and I think gays should have the same rights as anyone.  And this is definitely a step towards acceptance and moving on. 

    But...well...generally the guys in the military aren't very accepting.  I wonder how well this will be taken throughout the ranks.

    I disagree with this and that's from my personal experience with veterans from WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and more contemporary service men and women.  I think it's important to give service men and women the benefit of the doubt that they are able to accept their fellow soldiers if/when they decide to come out.

    I have several former Army and Marine friends whose opinion was that when it came to fighting side by side it didn't matter if your buddy liked girls or guys.  One friend of mine who saw combat at the beginning of the Iraq war (Marines) said that pretty much everyone knew who was gay and who wasn't in their unit. It wasn't talked about (because you couldn't), but it didn't matter.

    Sure there are a$$holes in the military who start trouble with their fellow soldiers who are suspected of being gay, but in general you'll find that sexual preference is the least of a soldier's concern about his fellow soldiers.  

    Now, I'm not saying it's a safe place for gay soldiers to come out now, but it's changing and that's what's important.  

  • imageMrsAJL:
    imageali-1411:

    I have mixed feelings about this one.  I'll support gay marriage and I think gays should have the same rights as anyone.  And this is definitely a step towards acceptance and moving on. 

    But...well...generally the guys in the military aren't very accepting.  I wonder how well this will be taken throughout the ranks.

    I disagree with this and that's from my personal experience with veterans from WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and more contemporary service men and women.  I think it's important to give service men and women the benefit of the doubt that they are able to accept their fellow soldiers if/when they decide to come out.

    I have several former Army and Marine friends whose opinion was that when it came to fighting side by side it didn't matter if your buddy liked girls or guys.  One friend of mine who saw combat at the beginning of the Iraq war (Marines) said that pretty much everyone knew who was gay and who wasn't in their unit. It wasn't talked about (because you couldn't), but it didn't matter.

    Sure there are a$$holes in the military who start trouble with their fellow soldiers who are suspected of being gay, but in general you'll find that sexual preference is the least of a soldier's concern about his fellow soldiers.  

    Now, I'm not saying it's a safe place for gay soldiers to come out now, but it's changing and that's what's important.  

    I hope you're right.  I guess it just all depends on who you know.  My grandpa was in WWII, my dad was in Vietnam and DH was in Iraq.  None of them are supportive of gay rights and none of them would have wanted a gay man with them.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageali-1411:
    imageMrsAJL:
    imageali-1411:

    I have mixed feelings about this one.  I'll support gay marriage and I think gays should have the same rights as anyone.  And this is definitely a step towards acceptance and moving on. 

    But...well...generally the guys in the military aren't very accepting.  I wonder how well this will be taken throughout the ranks.

    I disagree with this and that's from my personal experience with veterans from WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and more contemporary service men and women.  I think it's important to give service men and women the benefit of the doubt that they are able to accept their fellow soldiers if/when they decide to come out.

    I have several former Army and Marine friends whose opinion was that when it came to fighting side by side it didn't matter if your buddy liked girls or guys.  One friend of mine who saw combat at the beginning of the Iraq war (Marines) said that pretty much everyone knew who was gay and who wasn't in their unit. It wasn't talked about (because you couldn't), but it didn't matter.

    Sure there are a$$holes in the military who start trouble with their fellow soldiers who are suspected of being gay, but in general you'll find that sexual preference is the least of a soldier's concern about his fellow soldiers.  

    Now, I'm not saying it's a safe place for gay soldiers to come out now, but it's changing and that's what's important.  

    I hope you're right.  I guess it just all depends on who you know.  My grandpa was in WWII, my dad was in Vietnam and DH was in Iraq.  None of them are supportive of gay rights and none of them would have wanted a gay man with them.

    I'm sorry to hear that. :(

  • woohoo, it's about time!!
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • imageMrsAJL:
    imageali-1411:
    imageMrsAJL:
    imageali-1411:

    I have mixed feelings about this one.  I'll support gay marriage and I think gays should have the same rights as anyone.  And this is definitely a step towards acceptance and moving on. 

    But...well...generally the guys in the military aren't very accepting.  I wonder how well this will be taken throughout the ranks.

    I disagree with this and that's from my personal experience with veterans from WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and more contemporary service men and women.  I think it's important to give service men and women the benefit of the doubt that they are able to accept their fellow soldiers if/when they decide to come out.

    I have several former Army and Marine friends whose opinion was that when it came to fighting side by side it didn't matter if your buddy liked girls or guys.  One friend of mine who saw combat at the beginning of the Iraq war (Marines) said that pretty much everyone knew who was gay and who wasn't in their unit. It wasn't talked about (because you couldn't), but it didn't matter.

    Sure there are a$$holes in the military who start trouble with their fellow soldiers who are suspected of being gay, but in general you'll find that sexual preference is the least of a soldier's concern about his fellow soldiers.  

    Now, I'm not saying it's a safe place for gay soldiers to come out now, but it's changing and that's what's important.  

    I hope you're right.  I guess it just all depends on who you know.  My grandpa was in WWII, my dad was in Vietnam and DH was in Iraq.  None of them are supportive of gay rights and none of them would have wanted a gay man with them.

    I'm sorry to hear that. :(

     Me, too.  I can't help but wonder if they would have put those feelings aside while fighting for our country.  You know what I mean?  I have some friends in the service who also, unfortunately, don't have the most open minded view on gay men.  However, I believe 100% that they would put that aside when in that environment.  Maybe I'm wrong but I think this is a great step and I think the vast majority of our service men and woman will be fine with it.  (I don't mean to flame or start an argument, just wanted to give this opinion.)

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"