Here's my dilema...
This is our first child and have very little items needed for the arrival of our little one that we have waited for so long. We live approx 7 states away from the majority of my family and my husbands family. There is only approx 4-5 people that I would invite to a shower where I currently live without inviting people that are just mere aquaintances. Is it worth it to have a shower and should I invite all of the family and friends that are so far and most likely could not make it?
Oh what to do? Please send your thoughts and advice!
Re: To have or not to have a baby shower?
We recently moved too far from either family for them to attend a shower as well. We're just going to register and then give the link to any relative who asks. Certainly some will want to buy gifts regardless, although not all. Sending out shower invitations would just make them roll their eyes because we all know it isn't feasible.
The only local people I'd invite to a shower (or who would offer to throw me one) are coworkers and my workplace automatically does showers for pregnant employees (or their spouses) during the work day so that's covered. But I wouldn't be comfortable with the conventional kind anyway. It's different for people who really look forward to that tradition.
Since this is your first little one, you should have a baby shower.
Would any of the people in-state be willing to host the shower for you? If they are make sure they invite the distant friends and family members. You never know they make just suprise you and show up. Also, many may send you presents too!
Good Luck!
BFP #2 4/13/10. Bridget born 12/28/10
BFP #3 Finn born 8/11/15
[url=http://www.thebump.com/?utm_source=ticker&utm_medium=UBB&utm_campaign=tickers][img]http://global.thebump.com/tickers/tt1cb8c4.aspx[/img][/url]
This is what I was going to say. It seems odd to offer mostly people that you know cannot attend.