Pregnant after a Loss

SeminoleJessica

I just saw your page from earlier.. They didn't really tell me ANYTHING... just that it was "probably a little girl" but not definitely cuz her legs were pretty close together.. Which is why I'm curious as to what your girl parts pic looked like.. My  u/s tech was not so good.. she told us what we were looking at usually but not really details or whether things looked good or not..
Melissa & Jeff 5-27-06
m/c 1/2/08 and 3/12/08
Eve Amelia- Born 2/24/09. 6lb 9.9oz
Natalie Ruth - Born 6/13/11 7lb 6.6oz
imagebabies
baby growth

Re: SeminoleJessica

  • Can I see the pics she gave you?

    The actual pics I have arent very good, but it's still fresh in my mind. And she spent a lot of time explaining why she is a girl.  Maybe I can shed alittle light?  I will do my best.

    She mentioned the three lines, and where the bones are...

  • Loading the player...
  • In my blog.. It was on the 3rd, so you may have to go a page or two back.. the first pic is the girly parts.
    Melissa & Jeff 5-27-06
    m/c 1/2/08 and 3/12/08
    Eve Amelia- Born 2/24/09. 6lb 9.9oz
    Natalie Ruth - Born 6/13/11 7lb 6.6oz
    imagebabies
    baby growth
  • That is kinda a hard pic to see, but it does look similar to mine so...I think girl!  When do you go back?
  • We don't have another appt set up at the hospital, but my OBs office said if we ask at my next appt they will probably check for us. So a week from today, the 23rd..
    Melissa & Jeff 5-27-06
    m/c 1/2/08 and 3/12/08
    Eve Amelia- Born 2/24/09. 6lb 9.9oz
    Natalie Ruth - Born 6/13/11 7lb 6.6oz
    imagebabies
    baby growth
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"