Babies: 3 - 6 Months

Judge blocks part of AZ immigration law

2

Re: Judge blocks part of AZ immigration law

  • imageM&M*love:
    imageyankeebaby2:
    imageM&M*love:

    First off what most people don't know is that the AZ law is actually a Fed law currently in the books, AZ is only trying to make it so that they can actually enforce it. Second, it is within a states rights to protect their borders.

    I was raised on the AZ border a few miles from Mexico. I personally believe that we have a huge immigration problem and it is vital to national security that we close our borders until we can find a way to properly secure them. If you are illegal and you are not currently wanted for a crime then you should receive a visa and be taxed. We also need to improve the process in which an immigrant can receive a green card or citizenship. Immigrants are vital to our economy but they also put undue strain on it as well.

    I don't see anything wrong with the AZ law. Illegal is illegal and hopefully if the Fed Gov doesn't approve of the law then they will take the steps needed to get the situation under control.

    1ht

    yeah, actually we do understand it's a federal law.  It's not up to a state to enforce it.  Would AZ also be taking care of their own foreign policy and also entering into treaties?

    I see a lot wrong with this law, namely that it is a direct violation of the 14th amendment. 

    Immigration may be a problem but this law is not the solution. 

    You have a very convient and frequent habit of reading things improperly. What I said was MOST, as in a large majority, not ALL so before you get snarky how about you actually READ and COMPREHEND what it is that I am posting. If you are one of those who do know that the AZ law is currently a Fed law then good for you but my experience is that a large majority of the American population do not. As for it not being within AZ rights to enforce a Fed law, that is one of the most ridicules things I have ever heard. 

    I suppose that you also know that  one of the reason the law was passed in AZ is because Arizona, facing a $1 billion state budget shortfall in FY 2004 Southeast Arizona Medical Center- has filed for bankruptcy. Cochise's Copper Queen Community Hospital spends two-thirds of its operating income on uncompensated care for immigrants, a factor administrators say played a role in the hospital's decision to close its long-term care unit. University Medical Center in Tucson loses over $7 million a year caring for immigrants. The five largest health care providers in Maricopa County loses over 400 million every year in uncompensated care due to illegal immigrants. Trying to find a trama unit in S. AZ is ridicules, as most have had to close their doors due to the strain of providing care for illegal immigrants.


     

    The law is not intended to be racist it is a desperate step by the state of AZ to protect their citizens. The Fed Gov have done nothing to protect border states or ease their plight. AZ had to take measures to protect themselves since the Fed Gov, the ones who you feel are the only ones who have the right to enforce the law, are doing nothing. 

     

    While I agree there is a problem, this issue is more than just an illegal immigration one.  What is the state of Arizona doing about healthcare companies and hospitals etc who are charging WAY TOO MUCH for health services, which leads to exhorbitant deficits?  Its easy to say "these are the people we're treating, they are the reason for the deficit" when its more than that. 

  • Loading the player...
  • bb80bb80 member

     

    OMG, I looooooove when people C&P and then try to pass it off as their own deep thoughts.

    I was thinking the same thing....so lame

     

  • imagecarney09:
    imageLuckyT101:

    imagecampSnoopy02:
    we are all immigrants..

    We are not all immigrants. We are descendents of immigrants, who came to this country and applied to become a citizen LEGALLY! People who think they can come here, take jobs (even if legal citizens do not like to those jobs) and collect medicare (or medicaid, whatever). TAXPAYERS pay for these people living here!

    The federal gov't is doing a crap job on making sure our borders are secure and if a state wants to take it into their own hands, so be it. As long as police officers are not harrassing all hispanic and colored people, I am ok with this."Reasonable" I can live with. It is lawmakers that make me sick to protect the "rights" or "liberties" illegal immigrants think they automatically have by coming into the United States.

    Never EVER call me an immigrant because I am a LEGAL CITIZEN!

    Got my vent out... now to talking babies!

     

    What a stupid thing to say.  There are also immigrants who are legal citizens too....

     

    And for the record, a lot of those illegal immigrants are paying taxes and are uninsured, not collecting medicaid/medicare. 

    I edited this because i realized what i said was completely wrong. I did not mean to sound like that and I do realize there are Legal immigrants. Dumb me... sorry for offending people!

    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker image
  • what did I say wrong here?
    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker image
  • imagemrsbecky07:

    I don't think any of my ancestors came here legally....::scratches heaad::  no wait, I'm pretty sure my dad's ancestors did. My mom's - eh, I doubt it. 

    We pay a lot in taxes now though, so does that mean we're okay?

     

    My ancestors were forced here in chains. Am I legal?
    "HOW many US citizens and ranchers have been decapitated in Arizona by roving bands of paperless aliens, and how will a requirement that I have papers on me make that not happen?"courtesy of SueSue
  • imageMarc's Mrs.:

    If someone is pulled over for speeding and there's a reasonable suspicion of impairment, they're questioned and tested for drugs or alcohol - another violation of the law.  Likewise, if there's a reasonable suspicion of illegal immigration status, an officer would be within the law to ask for paperwork.  The problem with the speeding scenario is that they would also have to show license, registration and proof of insurance.  If they're here legally, they would be able to produce those documents.  If they weren't, then game on - that opens the door.

    Praytell, what would give an officer a "resonable suspicion" of illegal immigration status? Their skin color? The fact that their car smells like a burrito? There are 3+ passengers in the car? They are pulling lawn equipment in a trailer? They have a Mexican flag hanging from their mirror? Honestly, I cannot think of a single 'reasonable suspicion' one would have that would NOT involve racial or ethnic profiling. That is the problem I have with this law.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
  • imageLuckyT101:
    imagecarney09:
    imageLuckyT101:

    imagecampSnoopy02:
    we are all immigrants..

    We are not all immigrants. We are descendents of immigrants, who came to this country and applied to become a citizen LEGALLY! People who think they can come here, take jobs (even if legal citizens do not like to those jobs) and collect medicare (or medicaid, whatever). TAXPAYERS pay for these people living here!

    The federal gov't is doing a crap job on making sure our borders are secure and if a state wants to take it into their own hands, so be it. As long as police officers are not harrassing all hispanic and colored people, I am ok with this."Reasonable" I can live with. It is lawmakers that make me sick to protect the "rights" or "liberties" illegal immigrants think they automatically have by coming into the United States.

    Never EVER call me an immigrant because I am a LEGAL CITIZEN!

    Got my vent out... now to talking babies!

     

    What a stupid thing to say.  There are also immigrants who are legal citizens too....

     

    And for the record, a lot of those illegal immigrants are paying taxes and are uninsured, not collecting medicaid/medicare. 

    I edited this because i realized what i said was completely wrong. I did not mean to sound like that and I do realize there are Legal immigrants. Dumb me... sorry for offending people!

    I'm offended by your use of the phrase "colored people"

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMarc's Mrs.:
    imagextencornfield:
    imageMarc's Mrs.:
    imageCiconrad:
    imageStarAnnice:

    My only post on this subject:

    People who don't live here and are complaining can be likened to men complaining about menstrual cramps.  You have no idea what you're talking about.

    I will leave it at that.  I'm on this board to discuss babies and other happy subjects, not politics or religion.

    Carry on.

    Hmmm...yeah..ok.  So I don't live in a border state so I don't need to be concerned about a law that would basically legalize racial profiling?  Ok.

    Clearly there is work to be done on the illegal immigration issue but this law wasn't the solution.

     

     

    I'm just wondering what about this law = racial profiling?  My understanding of the law (based on what I've read) is that there had to be a primary law broken for law enforcement to inquire on the immigration status of an individual.  Meaning, the police couldn't just randomly stop someone (who has the "appearance" of an immigrant) walking down the street and ask for papers.  That would be racial profiling.  There had to be a clear violation of the law for the police to even make contact with a person.

    What if someone gets pulled over for speeding, do you think that warrants an immigration check?

    If someone is pulled over for speeding and there's a reasonable suspicion of impairment, they're questioned and tested for drugs or alcohol - another violation of the law.  Likewise, if there's a reasonable suspicion of illegal immigration status, an officer would be within the law to ask for paperwork.  The problem with the speeding scenario is that they would also have to show license, registration and proof of insurance.  If they're here legally, they would be able to produce those documents.  If they weren't, then game on - that opens the door.

     

    I admittedly posted a VERY bad example/scenario.

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageLuckyT101:
    what did I say wrong here?

    Indifferent   If you don't know then there's really no way to explain it to you.

  • imageBrideJaye:

    imageMarc's Mrs.:

    If someone is pulled over for speeding and there's a reasonable suspicion of impairment, they're questioned and tested for drugs or alcohol - another violation of the law.  Likewise, if there's a reasonable suspicion of illegal immigration status, an officer would be within the law to ask for paperwork.  The problem with the speeding scenario is that they would also have to show license, registration and proof of insurance.  If they're here legally, they would be able to produce those documents.  If they weren't, then game on - that opens the door.

    Praytell, what would give an officer a "resonable suspicion" of illegal immigration status? Their skin color? The fact that their car smells like a burrito? There are 3+ passengers in the car? They are pulling lawn equipment in a trailer? They have a Mexican flag hanging from their mirror? Honestly, I cannot think of a single 'reasonable suspicion' one would have that would NOT involve racial or ethnic profiling. That is the problem I have with this law.

    The part I bolded is the reasonable suspicion...If they can't produce license, registration or insurance information that appears credible or can't produce it at all, that's the reasonable suspicion.

  • Is anyone spending time with their babies???  Or just arguing on the bump?  

    LOL!

    imageBaby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • SwainbSwainb member
    imageMarc's Mrs.:


    If someone is pulled over for speeding and there's a reasonable suspicion of impairment, they're questioned and tested for drugs or alcohol - another violation of the law.  Likewise, if there's a reasonable suspicion of illegal immigration status, an officer would be within the law to ask for paperwork.  The problem with the speeding scenario is that they would also have to show license, registration and proof of insurance.  If they're here legally, they would be able to produce those documents.  If they weren't, then game on - that opens the door.

     

    The difference is that ANYONE can be suspect of drugs and alcohol, while only Hispanics would be under suspicion for being illegal.  The basis for asking for proof of citizenship would be race, therefore it is seen by some as racial profiling. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imagemajorwife:
    imageLuckyT101:
    what did I say wrong here?
    The use of "colored people" and the righteous indignation that YOUR [white] ancestors couldn't have been like those illegals.  

    I really was not saying it like this. Embarrassed I'm very sorry. And shame on my ancestors if they were like those illegals. Please accept big apologies. I'm from the sticks and can be very politically incorrect at times.Indifferent

    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker image
  • imagemajorwife:
    imageVanderLaan:

    Is anyone spending time with their babies???  Or just arguing on the bump?  

    LOL!

    Is this the bump version of "I fell sorry for your husband"?

    No, the bump version is I feel sorry for your LO and your husband.

    The spending time with your babies comment here was completely gratuitous. 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageMarc's Mrs.:
    imageBrideJaye:

    imageMarc's Mrs.:

    If someone is pulled over for speeding and there's a reasonable suspicion of impairment, they're questioned and tested for drugs or alcohol - another violation of the law.  Likewise, if there's a reasonable suspicion of illegal immigration status, an officer would be within the law to ask for paperwork.  The problem with the speeding scenario is that they would also have to show license, registration and proof of insurance.  If they're here legally, they would be able to produce those documents.  If they weren't, then game on - that opens the door.

    Praytell, what would give an officer a "resonable suspicion" of illegal immigration status? Their skin color? The fact that their car smells like a burrito? There are 3+ passengers in the car? They are pulling lawn equipment in a trailer? They have a Mexican flag hanging from their mirror? Honestly, I cannot think of a single 'reasonable suspicion' one would have that would NOT involve racial or ethnic profiling. That is the problem I have with this law.

    The part I bolded is the reasonable suspicion...If they can't produce license, registration or insurance information that appears credible or can't produce it at all, that's the reasonable suspicion.

    It's already illegal to drive without a license or proof of insurance, so I don't see why the extra law is necessary.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
  • imagextencornfield:
    imageMarc's Mrs.:
    imagextencornfield:
    imageMarc's Mrs.:
    imageCiconrad:
    imageStarAnnice:

    My only post on this subject:

    People who don't live here and are complaining can be likened to men complaining about menstrual cramps.  You have no idea what you're talking about.

    I will leave it at that.  I'm on this board to discuss babies and other happy subjects, not politics or religion.

    Carry on.

    Hmmm...yeah..ok.  So I don't live in a border state so I don't need to be concerned about a law that would basically legalize racial profiling?  Ok.

    Clearly there is work to be done on the illegal immigration issue but this law wasn't the solution.

     

     

    I'm just wondering what about this law = racial profiling?  My understanding of the law (based on what I've read) is that there had to be a primary law broken for law enforcement to inquire on the immigration status of an individual.  Meaning, the police couldn't just randomly stop someone (who has the "appearance" of an immigrant) walking down the street and ask for papers.  That would be racial profiling.  There had to be a clear violation of the law for the police to even make contact with a person.

    What if someone gets pulled over for speeding, do you think that warrants an immigration check?

    If someone is pulled over for speeding and there's a reasonable suspicion of impairment, they're questioned and tested for drugs or alcohol - another violation of the law.  Likewise, if there's a reasonable suspicion of illegal immigration status, an officer would be within the law to ask for paperwork.  The problem with the speeding scenario is that they would also have to show license, registration and proof of insurance.  If they're here legally, they would be able to produce those documents.  If they weren't, then game on - that opens the door.

     

    I admittedly posted a VERY bad example/scenario.

    Smile lol!

    Look ladies, I don't have a horse in this race.  I don't live in a border state but I do live in an area near several meat packing companies.  This area is gaining a heavy illegal immigrant population. 

    What gets me worked up is when people throw around the racial profiling term.  My DH is a cop.  Yes, there are a few bad apples that seem to give them all a bad name.  But my husband is a decent, hard working, ethical man and cop.  He would never pull someone over strictly based on the color of their skin or nationality.  Has he been accused of racial profiling - yes.  Was he cleared, not only by the agency but by a court of law - yes.  The two times he was accused of it were by people who were only trying to get out of tickets and one time the lawyer actually proved that the accuser had used this tactic twice before with other cops. 

    Speaking back to this law, most of the cops that I know would only do this if there was a serious violation of the law - armed robbery, battery, etc.  I know there are some out there who would for lesser violations but I think the paperwork alone on something like this would deter law enforcement from doing it for lesser crimes.

  • imageLuckyT101:

    imagemajorwife:
    imageLuckyT101:
    what did I say wrong here?
    The use of "colored people" and the righteous indignation that YOUR [white] ancestors couldn't have been like those illegals.  

    I really was not saying it like this. Embarrassed I'm very sorry. And shame on my ancestors if they were like those illegals. Please accept big apologies. I'm from the sticks and can be very politically incorrect at times.Indifferent

    Okay - but in all honesty, how do you think your ancestors came here?  And what does that mean - "like those illegals?" 

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • imagemajorwife:
    imageMeredithE:
    imageALG29:
    I'm curious of the opinions of people who live in areas with a high concentration of illegal immigrants. Personally, I'm OK with the law.
    I live in Georgia, and we have more undocumented workers then AZ. We are also completely broke, my income and property taxes are sky high, and property crime is going through the roof. I am NOT OK with racial profiling. Racial profiling is not an effective tool in fighting crime and it scares people from reporting crimes. Our police are over-worked , understaffed, and over-paid. The time they would be wasting asking for peoples "papers", enforcing a Federal Misdemeanor they could be patrolling keeping our streets safer.
    But you not in a border state Mer, you CAN'T have an opinion.
    I said I was interested in opinions of people who live in an area with a high concentration of illegal immigrants. Not people who live in boarder states. No need to be so snarky.
  • imagemajorwife:
    imageMeredithE:
    imageALG29:
    I'm curious of the opinions of people who live in areas with a high concentration of illegal immigrants. Personally, I'm OK with the law.
    I live in Georgia, and we have more undocumented workers then AZ. We are also completely broke, my income and property taxes are sky high, and property crime is going through the roof. I am NOT OK with racial profiling. Racial profiling is not an effective tool in fighting crime and it scares people from reporting crimes. Our police are over-worked , understaffed, and over-paid. The time they would be wasting asking for peoples "papers", enforcing a Federal Misdemeanor they could be patrolling keeping our streets safer.
    But you not in a border state Mer, you CAN'T have an opinion.
    I said I was interested in opinions of people who live in an area with a high concentration of illegal immigrants. Not people who live in boarder states. No need to be so snarky.
  • imageneonstarfish:

    *runs through while flashing boobies*

    ( o )( o ) 

    I just laughed so hard a little pee came out!!!

    BabyFruit Ticker Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
  • imageM&M*love:

    You have a very convient and frequent habit of reading things improperly. What I said was MOST, as in a large majority, not ALL so before you get snarky how about you actually READ and COMPREHEND what it is that I am posting. If you are one of those who do know that the AZ law is currently a Fed law then good for you but my experience is that a large majority of the American population do not. As for it not being within AZ rights to enforce a Fed law, that is one of the most ridicules things I have ever heard. 

    I suppose that you also know that  one of the reason the law was passed in AZ is because Arizona, facing a $1 billion state budget shortfall in FY 2004 Southeast Arizona Medical Center- has filed for bankruptcy. Cochise's Copper Queen Community Hospital spends two-thirds of its operating income on uncompensated care for immigrants, a factor administrators say played a role in the hospital's decision to close its long-term care unit. University Medical Center in Tucson loses over $7 million a year caring for immigrants. The five largest health care providers in Maricopa County loses over 400 million every year in uncompensated care due to illegal immigrants. Trying to find a trama unit in S. AZ is ridicules, as most have had to close their doors due to the strain of providing care for illegal immigrants.

    Those numbers you cut and paste are meaningless if you do not also include the TOTAL amount of uncompensated and undercompensated care absorbed by those respective hospitals. 

    Roughly $104 million is spent on those who are not of legal status by Parkland Hospital in Dallas.  By itself, it sounds like a large number until you realize that Parkland spends $523.4 Million a year in total for uncompensated and undercompensated care.  The $523.5 million that is incurred by those here legally is a much BIGGER issue than the $104 million for those who are not of legal status. 

  • imageMarc's Mrs.:

    Speaking back to this law, most of the cops that I know would only do this if there was a serious violation of the law - armed robbery, battery, etc.  I know there are some out there who would for lesser violations but I think the paperwork alone on something like this would deter law enforcement from doing it for lesser crimes.

    No - read what I posted earlier. One of the reasons the judge issued a preliminary injunction was because she interpreted the law to require police officers to check immigration status at every arrest - it wouldn't be optional.  Arizona argued this wasn't the case but in a paragraph that would make the heart of a professor of statutory interpretation skip a beat, she stated that the law was written to mandate such a check at every arrest (not every time charges are filed, every arrest) - which was a huge burden on police officers and the state.

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • imagemrsbecky07:
    imageLuckyT101:

    imagemajorwife:
    imageLuckyT101:
    what did I say wrong here?
    The use of "colored people" and the righteous indignation that YOUR [white] ancestors couldn't have been like those illegals.  

    I really was not saying it like this. Embarrassed I'm very sorry. And shame on my ancestors if they were like those illegals. Please accept big apologies. I'm from the sticks and can be very politically incorrect at times.Indifferent

    Okay - but in all honesty, how do you think your ancestors came here?  And what does that mean - "like those illegals?" 

    she said that, not me.

    Around here some terms are not considered derrogatory or offensive, so I did not realize that until I was flamed for it.

    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker image
  • How is not having a license or registration on you reasonable suspicion of being an illegal?  There are PLENTY of degenerate American Citizens out there right now driving on suspended licenses, or driving vehicles that aren't registered.  By your accounts, if they got pulled over and couldn't produce a license or registration, then the cop would reasonably suspect them of being illegal and ask them for proof of citizenship?  No way. 

     

    The cop would only suspect illegal status if the driver was BROWN or BLACK and couldn't produce the required license or registration. 

    That is why its considered profiling.

  • imageBrideJaye:
    imageMarc's Mrs.:
    imageBrideJaye:

    imageMarc's Mrs.:

    If someone is pulled over for speeding and there's a reasonable suspicion of impairment, they're questioned and tested for drugs or alcohol - another violation of the law.  Likewise, if there's a reasonable suspicion of illegal immigration status, an officer would be within the law to ask for paperwork.  The problem with the speeding scenario is that they would also have to show license, registration and proof of insurance.  If they're here legally, they would be able to produce those documents.  If they weren't, then game on - that opens the door.

    Praytell, what would give an officer a "resonable suspicion" of illegal immigration status? Their skin color? The fact that their car smells like a burrito? There are 3+ passengers in the car? They are pulling lawn equipment in a trailer? They have a Mexican flag hanging from their mirror? Honestly, I cannot think of a single 'reasonable suspicion' one would have that would NOT involve racial or ethnic profiling. That is the problem I have with this law.

    The part I bolded is the reasonable suspicion...If they can't produce license, registration or insurance information that appears credible or can't produce it at all, that's the reasonable suspicion.

    It's already illegal to drive without a license or proof of insurance, so I don't see why the extra law is necessary.

    I was merely replying to this example.  If you read my posts a few down from here, I don't think the intention of this law was to inquire for petty things like minor traffic violations.  I believe it was intended for more serious crimes.  Would some cops use it for minor violations?  Yes.  But I doubt most would.  Maybe that's just my crazy thinking though. 

  • imageLuckyT101:
    imagemrsbecky07:
    imageLuckyT101:

    imagemajorwife:
    imageLuckyT101:
    what did I say wrong here?
    The use of "colored people" and the righteous indignation that YOUR [white] ancestors couldn't have been like those illegals.  

    I really was not saying it like this. Embarrassed I'm very sorry. And shame on my ancestors if they were like those illegals. Please accept big apologies. I'm from the sticks and can be very politically incorrect at times.Indifferent

    Okay - but in all honesty, how do you think your ancestors came here?  And what does that mean - "like those illegals?" 

    she said that, not me.

    Around here some terms are not considered derrogatory or offensive, so I did not realize that until I was flamed for it.

    I know MW used the phrase first. I'm more concerned with your particular verbage in that last post. "Shame on my ancestors if they were like those illegals."

    I can guarantee your ancestors were likely "illegal," at least some of them, so does that mean shame on them? 

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • imageMarc's Mrs.:
    imageBrideJaye:
    imageMarc's Mrs.:
    imageBrideJaye:

    imageMarc's Mrs.:

    If someone is pulled over for speeding and there's a reasonable suspicion of impairment, they're questioned and tested for drugs or alcohol - another violation of the law.  Likewise, if there's a reasonable suspicion of illegal immigration status, an officer would be within the law to ask for paperwork.  The problem with the speeding scenario is that they would also have to show license, registration and proof of insurance.  If they're here legally, they would be able to produce those documents.  If they weren't, then game on - that opens the door.

    Praytell, what would give an officer a "resonable suspicion" of illegal immigration status? Their skin color? The fact that their car smells like a burrito? There are 3+ passengers in the car? They are pulling lawn equipment in a trailer? They have a Mexican flag hanging from their mirror? Honestly, I cannot think of a single 'reasonable suspicion' one would have that would NOT involve racial or ethnic profiling. That is the problem I have with this law.

    The part I bolded is the reasonable suspicion...If they can't produce license, registration or insurance information that appears credible or can't produce it at all, that's the reasonable suspicion.

    It's already illegal to drive without a license or proof of insurance, so I don't see why the extra law is necessary.

    I was merely replying to this example.  If you read my posts a few down from here, I don't think the intention of this law was to inquire for petty things like minor traffic violations.  I believe it was intended for more serious crimes.  Would some cops use it for minor violations?  Yes.  But I doubt most would.  Maybe that's just my crazy thinking though. 

     

    Ok, I understand this.  However, I'm oretty sure that if you are arrested for a serious crime now they check your immigration status no?  Aren't they already doing this?

  • imagemrsbecky07:
    imageMarc's Mrs.:

    Speaking back to this law, most of the cops that I know would only do this if there was a serious violation of the law - armed robbery, battery, etc.  I know there are some out there who would for lesser violations but I think the paperwork alone on something like this would deter law enforcement from doing it for lesser crimes.

    No - read what I posted earlier. One of the reasons the judge issued a preliminary injunction was because she interpreted the law to require police officers to check immigration status at every arrest - it wouldn't be optional.  Arizona argued this wasn't the case but in a paragraph that would make the heart of a professor of statutory interpretation skip a beat, she stated that the law was written to mandate such a check at every arrest (not every time charges are filed, every arrest) - which was a huge burden on police officers and the state.

    I hear what you're saying but a citation and an arrest are two different things.

  • Craptastic!!  I just got called to a meeting so I can't play anymore.  Yankeebabby - thanks for livening up the boards with an interesting debate.  This place has been dead lately!  Can't wait to catch up later...
  • imagecarney09:
     

    Ok, I understand this.  However, I'm oretty sure that if you are arrested for a serious crime now they check your immigration status no?  Aren't they already doing this?

    Immigration status is not usually part of any arrest inquiry done by police.  Status may come up during plea bargaining in front of a judge (certain crimes can make one deportable and the accused need to know all of the potential ramifications to pleading guilty) and by prison officials once incarceration is deemed necessary. 

  • imageMarc's Mrs.:
    imagemrsbecky07:
    imageMarc's Mrs.:

    Speaking back to this law, most of the cops that I know would only do this if there was a serious violation of the law - armed robbery, battery, etc.  I know there are some out there who would for lesser violations but I think the paperwork alone on something like this would deter law enforcement from doing it for lesser crimes.

    No - read what I posted earlier. One of the reasons the judge issued a preliminary injunction was because she interpreted the law to require police officers to check immigration status at every arrest - it wouldn't be optional.  Arizona argued this wasn't the case but in a paragraph that would make the heart of a professor of statutory interpretation skip a beat, she stated that the law was written to mandate such a check at every arrest (not every time charges are filed, every arrest) - which was a huge burden on police officers and the state.

    I hear what you're saying but a citation and an arrest are two different things.

    Yes, but what you are saying is something very different too - you are saying that you think cops would only do this for "big" crimes, right? (am I interpreting you correctly?)  My point is, the way the law is written, they don't have a choice.  If there is an arrest - regardless of what the arrest is for - they have to check immigration status and determine if the person is here legally or is a citizen.  (at least under the current interpretation of the law.)

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • imageMarc's Mrs.:
    Craptastic!!  I just got called to a meeting so I can't play anymore.  Yankeebabby - thanks for livening up the boards with an interesting debate.  This place has been dead lately!  Can't wait to catch up later...

    What time will you be back?  I have another lively debate dying to be posted but I really want to work around your schedule:)

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageSam78:
    imagecarney09:
     

    Ok, I understand this.  However, I'm oretty sure that if you are arrested for a serious crime now they check your immigration status no?  Aren't they already doing this?

    Immigration status is not usually part of any arrest inquiry done by police.  Status may come up during plea bargaining in front of a judge (certain crimes can make one deportable and the accused need to know all of the potential ramifications to pleading guilty) and by prison officials once incarceration is deemed necessary. 

     

    Thanks for the info, I wasn't aware of the particulars.  It kinda sounds like its being done now, for serious crimes, which is part of the reason this AZ law was enacted in the first place right?  To find a way to combat the increase in crime....

  • imagemajorwife:

    imageLuckyT101:
    Again that is not an excuse. Please note the term is offensive and don't use it again.

    ETA: If you're from the Northern parts of MO I have been to, then I understand how backwater you are.  But we here are what you consider mixed company and you should know there are things that you don't say in mixed company, the term colored people being one of them.

    Well noted.

    Tho how was I supposed to know without ever being told so, which I have today obviously on here? I have friends that are black and I dated a guy for two years that was Indian (middle eastern). DH has Native American and African American in his blood lines. But I have never been flamed, ever, about my use of words... until today. Which I feel horrible about. I've learned, now please lets move on...

    image
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker image
  • imagecarney09:
    imageSam78:
    imagecarney09:
     

    Ok, I understand this.  However, I'm oretty sure that if you are arrested for a serious crime now they check your immigration status no?  Aren't they already doing this?

    Immigration status is not usually part of any arrest inquiry done by police.  Status may come up during plea bargaining in front of a judge (certain crimes can make one deportable and the accused need to know all of the potential ramifications to pleading guilty) and by prison officials once incarceration is deemed necessary. 

     

    Thanks for the info, I wasn't aware of the particulars.  It kinda sounds like its being done now, for serious crimes, which is part of the reason this AZ law was enacted in the first place right?  To find a way to combat the increase in crime....

    ICE can be called in at any time by anybody (seriously, you can call on your neighbor if you want).  Whether they have the resources to be able to respond is a different matter.  Checking immigration status, as pp have stated, can be quite cumbersome for local police so that it takes resources that local departments often do not have especially for petty criminals. ICE generally focuses on major criminals (as I'm sure we would all agree is a good thing), so checking the immigration status of speeders and the like would probably not accomplish much anyway.

  • SwainbSwainb member
    imageLuckyT101:
    imagemajorwife:

    imageLuckyT101:
    Again that is not an excuse. Please note the term is offensive and don't use it again.

    ETA: If you're from the Northern parts of MO I have been to, then I understand how backwater you are.  But we here are what you consider mixed company and you should know there are things that you don't say in mixed company, the term colored people being one of them.

    Well noted.

    Tho how was I supposed to know without ever being told so, which I have today obviously on here? I have friends that are black and I dated a guy for two years that was Indian (middle eastern). DH has Native American and African American in his blood lines. But I have never been flamed, ever, about my use of words... until today. Which I feel horrible about. I've learned, now please lets move on...

    Don't you watch television? You obviously get on the internet. I can't believe you didn't know not to say that.  You don't live in a bubble.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I live in border state. Do you have any idea how hard it is to keep those Rhode Islanders out?? I didn't think so.

    ::jumps in line to motorboat Neon's boobies::

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageLuckyT101:
    imagemajorwife:

    imageLuckyT101:
    Again that is not an excuse. Please note the term is offensive and don't use it again.

    ETA: If you're from the Northern parts of MO I have been to, then I understand how backwater you are.  But we here are what you consider mixed company and you should know there are things that you don't say in mixed company, the term colored people being one of them.

    Well noted.

    Tho how was I supposed to know without ever being told so, which I have today obviously on here? I have friends that are black and I dated a guy for two years that was Indian (middle eastern). DH has Native American and African American in his blood lines. But I have never been flamed, ever, about my use of words... until today. Which I feel horrible about. I've learned, now please lets move on...

    I didn't want to flame you but again you have offended with your defense of I'm not a racist, my best friend is black.

     

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageLuckyT101:
     

    We are not all immigrants. We are descendents of immigrants, who came to this country and applied to become a citizen LEGALLY!

    imageLuckyT101:
    Well noted.

    Tho how was I supposed to know without ever being told so, which I have today obviously on here? I have friends that are black and I dated a guy for two years that was Indian (middle eastern). DH has Native American and African American in his blood lines. But I have never been flamed, ever, about my use of words... until today. Which I feel horrible about. I've learned, now please lets move on...

    In the case of the African American blood line in your husband's family, they most likely did not come to here, apply to be a citizen and were granted citizenship (in a rosy "Welcome to America" kind of way).

    The initial attitude of "we came here and did it legally" was what was very shallow and narrow minded  IMO.  Add to that the fact that your husband has AA blood lines makes me not understand your position even more.  And "I have black friends" is NEVER a good defense when you have used a term that is/can be construed as derogatory towards African Americans. 

     

  • imageMeredithE:
    imageALG29:
    I'm curious of the opinions of people who live in areas with a high concentration of illegal immigrants. Personally, I'm OK with the law.
    I live in Georgia, and we have more undocumented workers then AZ. We are also completely broke, my income and property taxes are sky high, and property crime is going through the roof. I am NOT OK with racial profiling. Racial profiling is not an effective tool in fighting crime and it scares people from reporting crimes. Our police are over-worked , understaffed, and over-paid. The time they would be wasting asking for peoples "papers", enforcing a Federal Misdemeanor they could be patrolling keeping our streets safer.

    I'm in California, Los Angeles to be exact and I completely agree with Mer. I'm also a decendent of both Hispanic and Portuguese immigrants. Yes, my Portuguese ancestors had to come to mexico and cross over into El Paso, light skinned and green eyed. How the hell do you think they got here?

    A better system needs to be put in place and it's not for the police to do. I also wanted to note that I have several neighbors and friends who are undocumented Surprise. Majority of them work their ass of for the "american dream" and don't get into trouble, pay taxes (under a fake SSN), some brought from a young  age and are waiting on the process.

This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"