someone i know is pregnant and not with the baby's father...they had dated in the past and just hooked up every now and then. and then she got pregnant. she has no intentions of being with the father again. he says he wants to be a part of childs life, but we dont know if he'll stick around. if you were a single mother and not with the baby's father...would you give the baby your last name or babys fathers last name?
Re: need opinions: baby to have father's last name or not?
That's tough. I would say probably give the baby my last name if I knew I wasn't going to see the father.
The 2 mom's I know who have kids with someone they are not with both gave their kids the father's last name. So, I guess I wasn't helpful at all....
In that situation, I would give the baby my name.
I kick myself in the ass every day for not doing that myself when I was in her situation 17 years ago.
I dont agree with that exactly... if the father is involved and devoted, he deserves to have that child bear his name as well.
I agree that hyphenating in this case might be best...
My Ovulation Chart early m/c 09/05, early m/c 02/08,and missed m/c 04/12 at 16 weeks **I was Diagnosed with Factor V Leiden & Heterozygous Mthfr 02/08 I was put on Lovenox while pregnant with my daughter and will also be for my next pregnancy
My Ovulation Chart early m/c 09/05, early m/c 02/08,and missed m/c 04/12 at 16 weeks **I was Diagnosed with Factor V Leiden & Heterozygous Mthfr 02/08 I was put on Lovenox while pregnant with my daughter and will also be for my next pregnancy
I have two good friends who had kids while single, and both gave the kids their own last names, even though the fathers were somewhat involved. The reasoning, (which I completely agree with) is that if the father is enough of a d*ck to end up not being involved/interested in the kid's life, he probably would never agree to sign off on a legal name change to the mom's last name. But if things work out and the mom and dad end up together or he ends up being a great father, then of course he'd agree to legally change the name to his. It just gives the mom more options and time to see how things end up shaking out.
DD doesn't have the same last name as me (I kept my maiden name) and it's never been a problem - but if I'd given my child another man's name who ended up being a flake, I'd be pissed every time I had to write/say/see his name!
I got pg at 18. I gave DS my last name & it was one of the BEST decisions I ever made. My son's bio father & I were together for 7 (horrible) years. Once we split (because he sent me to the ER) when DS was 5 years old, I met my now husband. We got married 2 years later & I wanted DS to have my married name. His bio father would NOT grant a name change. He hated the idea of DS having some other guy's last name. Thank GOD DS had my last name, though. I took my maiden name as my new legal middle name & DH's name as my new last name (no hyphen). So, when I had to sign stuff that had to do with DS (school & doctor stuff, mainly) I would sign my full name, with my maiden name as my middle name, so I could show that we did have that name in common.
2 years after we were married DH ended up adopting my DS (his bio father basically sold his rights in lieu of paying back & future support) & at that point DS was able to have my married name. But, had it not been for that unbelievable turn of events, it would have been a really good thing for DS to have MY (maiden) last name, at least.
This 100%!!
Would definitely be mine.
As someone who worked in schools, I could never understand why a child would have the father's last name yet no father was listed on the birth certificate. I saw this a lot. Why give the child the father's name in that situation?
Also I think it looks bad when mom has 5 kids by 5 different men and everyone, including mom, has a different last name!