My OB said the ER doctor sent my the "specimin" (read: baby) that was removed from my vagina while I was there to pathology to do testing and determine what (if anything) was wrong with the baby. I thought this was something that was only done for recurrent m/c. Perhaps because we saw the baby on U/S with a strong hb only a few days before the m/c? I'm glad that they're doing this because I'd like to know....I'm just surprised.
Re: Is this normal for a first m/c?
I don't know...mine did not, my insurance doesn't cover any kind of testing until 3 losses.
With just one loss, I'm in the "fluke" category and the what, 1 in 4 pgs end in m/c statistic according to my insurance company. Gee, thanks, I sure feel like a fluke. F that.
Oh, man, I'm angry today.
BFP #2 4/13/10. Bridget born 12/28/10
BFP #3 Finn born 8/11/15
[url=http://www.thebump.com/?utm_source=ticker&utm_medium=UBB&utm_campaign=tickers][img]http://global.thebump.com/tickers/tt1cb8c4.aspx[/img][/url]
But doesn't it make you feel sooooo much better to know "it's common." ?? PUKE.
So true. I've blamed my running, the "half caf / half decaf" coffee I had at Thanksgiving, the stress at my work, the ONE pnv I forgot to take, etc etc......
Any time you have a surgery and take something from you they HAVE TO send it to Pathology that is to check if it was molar or not. If you were to have chromosomal testing done then 1/2 gets sent to pathology and 1/2 gets sent to genetics. So, you will not find out if anything other than a molar pregnancy was found.
I don't see why this is necessary, then. We saw a normal baby with a strong hb at 7w0d. I actually passed the fetus in the ER and the Doctor said it was completely "in tact." Wouldn't they sort of be able to tell by just looking at it if it were molar? Would a molar pregnancy have had a HB?