I don't know why anything that BM does surprises me but sometimes she just doesn't cease to amaze me, I swear. On her own daughter's classroom website, she wants to be nasty to DH and I.
I'm a member of the classroom website, that's a place where you can see pics of the kids at school and see what they are learning and talk to other parents, etc. My screen name is Mrs.LastName, and I have a brief bio up of where I'm from, where I went to school since I grew up in this town, something about SD's father and I being excited for the school year and how much SD has been learning and how happy we are. BM added herself to the site a week ago, as her first name and Dh's (my DH, her ex) last name, then she changed her screen name to be SD's Mommy so that everyone was sure to know that she was SD's mom and not me. She has a real issue with me even being in SD's life.
So today, she adds a little bio stating that she is SD's real mom and that I'm listed below her on the member list and that I'm DH's 4th wife and that now she has finally married a great man that she trusts completely and he's a great father to SD, blah blah blah then she pretty much repeated exactly what I said about how much SD was learning and then she added in there that she and her new husband are the only ones that do her homework every night with her and read to her every night, etc.
Really? Really this seems like an appropriate place to attack us? Geez!
Re: insecure much?
And Tifanico, she already did the My space thing so I deleted my page.
I wholeheartedly agree with you, Drew. You weren't implying that you were SD's BM. And even if you were, there are more appropriate ways to handle this situation. Like, "Hey, could you mention that you are her SM for clarification?" So simple... not "Let's bash her to make myself look better," even though that seemed to work against her favor.
My thoughts on the SM getting involved is that as long as you aren't going against what DH says, why couldn't you get involved. If a SM gets involved and only creates yet another headache for the teacher, then yeah, step back. You have every right to know what is going on and be involved.
And I'm glad you documented this. Judges don't look happily on libel. She isn't even doing it in an anonymous forum. Nut job.....?
I don't think you're out of line to have a bio. You're active in your SD's life and people should be thankful for that not look down on you for it. You could just not give a s h i t about her.
As for BM, that's insanely childish and only makes her look like an a-hole. Definitely bring it up to the custody evaluator. It shows once again how unstable she is.
That said, I know how much that sucks to deal with. You try to do what's right for the kid, you try to keep your mouth shut about BM and you get attacked in the most inappropriate places. Turning the other cheek gets old, but it always comes down to what is best for the kids and unfortunately for your sanity-that's almost ALWAYS being the bigger person and ignoring the attacks. GL
Because of course SD's schoolwork should suffer just so SM doesn't step on BM's toes by "interjecting herself" and showing an interest in SD's academics.
Grow up.
Where the SM went to school is completely irrelevant to SD's education...there is no way SD.'s schoolwork would suffer if, *gasp* her actual DAD had gone on and made his bio and gotten involved.
True. SM should hide in a corner and not talk about herself, especially to other parents! What might they conclude? That SM loves the SD? Is an involved parent? For shame! Naughty SM!
She would give SMs a bad name! We should put a stop to this before people start getting the idea that SMs can love and care for children that don't carry their genetic make up!?
I included where I went to school because I grew up in this city and went to school here so I shared that info. As a BM is it offensive to you to know where I went to grade school and high school? SD's dad and I are a team, we're partners, I happen to be the one who spends all day online (for work) so we decided I would put my name on the site. SD's dad is completely involved, my name is on the website, that's it. He talks to the teacher, goes to school open houses, he helps SD with her homework, reads to her, etc. And *gasp* so do I, oh no!
I don't have much respect for dads who turn over the parenting and being involved to their wives, who may or may not be around for the duration of the kid's childhood. If it works for you, fine...but I am glad that ex, despite his hundreds of flaws, doesn't let his girlfriend pretend to be the mom while he sits back and does nothing.
Drew's DH is not taking a back seat. Her presence in an online forum is hardly taking over the parenting. If he were online or was as well versed in online communication as Drew, then maybe he would also create a profile or do that instead. But maybe he's like my DH who doesn't even remember the password to his email. Their household deserves to be represented without forcing DH to communicate in a way that may be difficult for him. She isn't pretending to be DH.
I, for one, do the communicating with SKs teachers. It's because I have more time and better communication skills. That doesn't mean that my DH is any less involved in them personally or even with the direct communication to the teachers. I get his opinions and form a mutually agreed upon email. The teachers don't mind; we're both involved; the SKs feel loved and cared for. If BM had a problem with that, we would then talk about it. But all of this in no way means that us SMs are hijacking the parental control or that our DH's aren't involved.?
Who says Drew's DH does nothing? God forbid more than two people be involved in a child's life! I
think that is a load of crap quite honestly. But then again you have made it clear that no one but bio mom and dad should have any kind of relationship or be a parental figure because someone might step on your toes!
What are you really afraid of? That SM will be more involved, have a better relationship than you do with your child? Oh, wait of course not because you will make it CLEAR that no other person has ANY input. So I suppose your DH if you have one or will ever get one will take a completely hands off approach and not say a damn word . He wont be involved in his sk's life. If that works for you yippee. But don't pawn your views that no one else can live up to the MOM, on the rest of us.
I'm not his girlfriend, I'm his wife and you're assuming you know how my DH handles his daughter's education and her parenting just because my name is on the teacher's website and not his. Wow, are you way off base. My post was on how ridiculous BM is being trying to start drama on her child's school website just because I'm on there, my post was not about which parent takes a more active role in SD's education. If you want to launch a rant about how BD's don't take enough interest in their child's life then do it in your own post and don't lump my DH in that category.
There is so much wrong going on here...where to start..
1. So BM is wrong to make the classroom website a battle ground. That can only hurt her DD
2. Drewlily is wrong for presenting herself as SD's mother. Yes, DL, that is how your post comes off, like you are her mother, which is a HUGE wrong in the SM handbook. If someone did that to me I wouldn't be insecure, I'd be STARK RAVING PISSED OFF. So you're wrong for writing up a profile like that on SD's website. You could be involved on the website and not in your face I'M MRS LILY. You made SD's website about you, which smacks of insecurity of your own, and immaturity as well.
3. Are you really your DH's Fourth wife??? Cause MAJOR side eye at a fourth wife when he's in his thirties. Gives a texture to this situation....
4. It is telling you only have a blinky for that one SD.
5. I think all three of you could use co-parenting classes.
The naming convention was for the mothers of the children, not the stepmothers. You overstepped your bounds on this one, and you want to fight it tooth and nail to prove how "not wrong" you are.
I already said BM was wrong using the SD's class site as a platform to get to you, but ironically you are doing the same thing. Maturity would be NOT staking that claim in the first place.
Like it or not, it's NOT your place to do all the parent stuff for SD. By all means have a presence there to see what she's up to in class, but you overstepped and I understand, not condone but understand BM's reaction.
This isn't directed at any post in particular, just putting in my opinions...
1. Drew can't put on the school bio info related to education...on the school bio...but BM can talk about her ex's other marriage(s)...on the school bio... (catching my point?)
2. "...he's a great father to SD..." Wait, wait, wait. He can be a father to SD, but Drew can't be a mother? Now I'm confused...
Seriously, I think (some) SMs are screwed either way. If she got and here and posted about how she got a letter something about joining this school website and was complaining saying its not my kid why should I do it, make her mom do it...she'd get slammed for that instead.
That's all.
1. Drew can't put on the school bio info related to education...on the school bio...but BM can talk about her ex's other marriage(s)...on the school bio... (catching my point?) Neither one was right. Just because BM was wrong, doens't mean DL gets to be wrong, too. That is a foolish arguement.
2. "...he's a great father to SD..." Wait, wait, wait. He can be a father to SD, but Drew can't be a mother? Now I'm confused... Well, Drew isn't her mother, she's her stepmother. Her 2nd stepmother? or 3rd stepmother?
And yes, it's the prickly position of the stepparent to be a parent and yet not a parent. It's a tightrope that SM's and SD's must walk. In this case, it failed. Nobody said it was fair, but DL signed up for this as a fourth wife of a man with 2 (?) kids.
Correct me if I'm wrong (which I may be) but this is the assumption I'm making here....
You're on a BLENDED family bored, so you're in a blended family. I think that's an assumption anyone here would make. But wouldn't that mean that either
a. You're divorced/have children with someone other than your DH, making you "sloppy seconds" yourself?
or
b. Your DH is divorced/has children with someone other than you. Meaning...you've also got "sloppy seconds"
I'm honestly not trying to be mean or snarky, just don't think you need to be on such a high horse about it...
Here I am, on record, calling the sloppy seconds theory stupid. Actually, STOOPID.
But marrying 4 times shows before age 40 shows a history of poor decisions making or impulse control. It's not about sloppy seconds, LOL. I probably got mroe sloppy seconds that you, DL in college. Don't worry about that.
If the naming convention on the website is Mr/Mrs LastName, and her name is Mrs LastName, why would it be appropriate for her to use something else? It's her name, it's not like she chose SDsMom or anything.
It seems really hard to say how things like this SHOULD be handled.. when in history have things like bios for parents/stepparents in online school-related forums ever been an issue before? There's not a lot of etiquette for these matters.
Because clearly I'm being literal here, gawd.
Look, you have nothing nice to say about the woman. Like, ever. Not just today. And yes, she's kind of wacko, and yes, woefully immature. But I think you're a little too overinvovled here.
Yes, your HUSBAND should have a profile, not you. Yes, your HUSBAND, should be communicating with the school, as opposed to you, and no, you really don't need a bio of your own. He's the parent, and while your dedication to your stepdaughter is admirable, you need to back off a bit. I am willing to bet if you did, biomom would probably simmer down a bit as well. And your husband needs to step up and stop passing the buck off on you.
Drewlily, do you really not see how you have a hand in anything here? You were agressive in your creation of a bio on the website. Sure, go on there and help SD, but by putting your business out there, YOU raised the ire of BM.
I can't imagine a SM having her detailed info on a bio in SD's class site. It's so narcissistic. Maybe that's the whole problem?