Here's the latest drama in my crazy family.
Take this situation: Bob and Jane Smith have a daughter. They divorce because Jane is a lesbian. Bob get remarried to Sue. Jane never changes her married last name, but is in a long-term relationship with a woman.
15 years later....Daughter is getting married. Invite says:
Mrs. Jane Smith and Mr. and Mrs Bob Smith request the honor of yada yada yada.
Now everyone is "talking" because Jane referred to herself as Mrs Smith. Etiquette-wise, is that wrong?
Re: nbr: lesbian parent, wedding invites
I don't see anything wrong with that. Not everyone chooses to go through the hassle of changing their names back to their maiden name following a divorce.?
Why would it be a big deal? If people knew they were divorced, I don't see what the fuss is about.?
ETA: Does the 'lesbian' detail even matter in the context of this story/question??
The O'Baby Blog
I think etiquette wise it is proper since a woman that is divorced is still referred to as Mrs First Last name.
"In the U.S., the form ?Mrs. Miller Smith? was traditionally used, with the birth surname in place of the first name. However, the form ?Mrs. Jane Miller? has since become widely used for divorc?es, even in formal correspondence."
But, I can definitely see how it would stir up some trouble!
if its over the Jane Smith... well i don't even know what to say cause it is her name. lots of married women don't go back to their maiden name after divorce
Aahh -- yes, I would have used "Ms." if it were me.. I thought "Smith" was the issue at hand. ?
The O'Baby Blog
Its the Mrs part that is getting to people.
I assumed she referred to herself as a Mrs because she is in a relationship with a woman. They'd get married if it was legal in Michigan.
I just wondered what others thought.
This. My mom kept her married name after my parents divorced. It seems common place these days, especially when mothers want to keep the same last name as their children.
:-)
Der. I hadn't really thought of it from that perspective.