Had my 30 week appointment this past Friday. My doctor, who I love, asked me if we'd be going natural, or would I be scheduling a c-section. I was kind of thrown off by the question, seeing as though he is so conservative. I guess he is giving me the option to choose. Now, I know I am terrified of the pain with natural childbirth (yes, this is my first), but I am also terrified of the recovery period after a c-section. Just want to hear your advice/opinions/stories. This baby has to come out SOMEHOW....just don't know which choice is best.
Re: C-Section vs. Natural Child Birth
It's really your personal choice. I want a natural childbirth but with an epidural. I'm not about to go through the whole thing without the help of the epidural if I need it.?
C-sections are major surgery but plenty of people have them and are glad they did. I would do your research and figure out what's best for you. But if you haven't had any complications or issues then there's no reason for you to need a c-section. ?
Do drs get paid more for performing c-sections? I don't get why they offer/suggest them when they aren't medically necessary. I'd prefer to skip the major surgery of a c-section unless it was the best choice for the baby and/or myself. I know a vaginal delivery is scary... but it's my preference. Imagine being able to hold your baby right away instead of getting sewn back up first!
Baking Blog
For a first child I would at least TRY to give birth vaginally.
I did have to have a C/S after my induction with Rylee (CPD - pushed for 2 hours) and will schedule a C/S for this baby...
But I would never have considered a C/S at 30 weeks with Rylee.
Malakai - 8.3.09
Ezra - 12.1.11 ASD
I agree, I thought c-sections were the last resort, again, I was surprised he spoke of it so freely. He did tell me that my baby seems to be on the larger side. I am tiny (5'1" and 130 lbs- 7 months pregnant/ 115 pre-pregnant) and my husband is a big guy (6'2" and 225 lbs). At my last ultrasound (this past Friday) it seems as if the baby is going to be on the "big" side. Maybe he is just getting me ready just in case I can't go naturally.
Mama Jan's Kitchen... a food blog
In a word, YES, they do! It's the easiest thing for them (OBs are surgeons!) in terms of time, making money, and legality. They can play the "we did everything we could card" without a thought.
i would not choose a c/s unless there was a reason....
and that is coming from someone who IS choosing a c/s this time b/c my vaginal birth was so horrible to heal from - i had a 4th degree tear that took over 8w of pain to heal from- and i still have issues down tehre b/c of it... which is why i'm having a c/s this time.
BUT- that is not very common ... and would always go with vaginal for a first birth with no medical reason not to.
~after 34 cycles we finally got our 2nd little bundle of joy~

My IF blog
Same here! Although I did have one for my first (emergency c-section) and with my other babies, we made the decision for the repeat sections for safety at this point. I was too afraid of rupturing during delivery. Having labored for 3 freaking days with my first, I know I could've handled a vaginal delivery. Our bodies are supposed to be made for this, so I couldn't see not giving it a try first. I am kind of surprised your doctor offered you the choice. Good luck!