Are you having your baby get these or opt out? The eye drops are for gonorrhea and chlamydia, which ob would have checked us for via pap smear, right? So if negative we don't need eye drops.
I am leaning towards opt out of both but want to hear opinions please!
Re: Vaccines, Hep b and eye drops at birth
I'm in NZ. The only routine shot at birth is Vitamin K, but obviously you can opt out. I personally opt for the vitamin K.
We don't routinely do eye drops or hep b here, only if Mum is at risk of those things.
Elizabeth 5yrs old Jane 3yrs old
Dx: balanced translocation and LPD
TTC since Oct 2011
BPF 02/19/12, EDD 10/31/12, natural m/c 02/28/12 (4w6d)
IVF (BCPs starting 10/30/12, ER 11/18/12, 5dt of 1 beautiful, healthy embryo 11/23/12)
BFP 12/02/12, u/s @ 6w,5d showed 2 HBs! Identical twins!!
Bed rest from 21w-35w due to short cervix, hospital bed rest from 23w-32w due to PTL
Our rainbows were born 07/19/13 (36w, 5d)
I never found much that made me feel strongly about not getting any of them. So, delaying it is.
While gonorrhea and chlamydia are the most common causes of serious infection in newborns, they are not the only bacterial infections that can cause eye problems in newborns. Since it is a simple thing to do, I will be having my son get the antibiotic. I would be devastated if he had a problem because I refused something so simple. It causes blurry vision for a short time, but the consequences of an infection could last a lifetime.
I'm also going to have him get the vitamin K shot. I'm a RN and I've seen babies have serious trouble with clotting. It's rare, but it happens. I'm also going to have him get the hep B. It may not provide complete protection, but it will protect him a little. In my mind, these are simple things to do to help protect the child I spent the last 40 weeks doing everything for.
All of this.
I was going to say this, but figured it might not go over well. But since you were brave enough, I'll piggyback. Nobody wants to believe it could happen to them, but the fact is- things happen that we'd never want to think about and it's just not worth the risk. No downside to me.
Yep agree 100 percent with this. We get everything. Better safe than sorry.
LFAF Summer 2016 Awards:
Very interesting!
This is interesting but I wonder how well it works since my breastmilk, as well as most women's, didn't come in for a few days after birth.
My stance when it comes to my kids is that the only person I can trust 100% is myself because shitt happens. If someone asked me to risk a million dollars on whether or not my husband might cheat on me, I'd risk the million and say no way, I know he's faithful. But I just can't take chances with my kids' health and my DH knows it. Even though my decision means I'm saying he could be a cheater, he understands my reasoning on principle even though he knows himself and knows it's not possible lol
All this for me too. The only reason they do hep B at birth is because it is the only one they can safely give that early.It is completely pointless for a newborn to have this unless the mother has it.
While the risk of a infant contracting hep b is low, there is still a risk, even if the mother is negative. Over a million people have Hep B and a majority don't know they have it (according to recent information). I know I don't have it, but I don't know if my parents, ILs, or close friend have it. I'd rather my baby have a little protection in case something were to happen.
We're getting it all done.
Make a pregnancy ticker
Personally, I follow my chosen pediatricians schedule for vaccines and I'm very comfortable with her recommendations. And despite extremely low risk for the diseases, I want to be safe rather than sorry.
Can you talk to the pediatrician you will be using about it now? Ours was happy to answer any questions like that beforehand and encouraged us to have and share our plans for vaccines with them prior to childbirth.
They only do Vit K and eye drops in Canada, and I can't see a reason why you wouldn't do either. The baby gets blurry vision for a while, but honestly, how well can a newborn see anyway? And I couldn't imagine anything wrong with vitamins. Baby is likely so overwhelmed with sensory input it's not going to notice a tiny injection.
I've never heard of Hep B at birth, but then again, we don't do an adult pertussis vaccine during pregnancy, either, so I was a little surprised at that. I couldn't provide an opinion on that one....
Monster Truck (It's a GIRL!) is due 19/02/2015!
I'm also an RN and I agree with this
That's the position I have; I like how NZ does it!
Already posted but saw this comment and wanted to add that we're pretty much the same (though we're only on our third
) and did our research as well. My second born did need the injection but I think we'll do the K drops this time. I had no problems declining everything with my firstborn in the hospital in PA.
We were also told it is State Law to have the eye drops. I didn't look into it because we plan on doing it a few hours after birth anyway, but the RN said they cannot release any baby that hasn't had the eye ointment.
Throwing out that I'd feel like an idiot was uncalled for but I'll ignore that part. I actually have done a lot of research on the pros and cons of each...so while my answer was short my decision was not. I research everything in length and while thats your opinion...it's not mine...and thats fine... no reason to respond so judgmentally. And for the record I said that I'd not do hep B AT BIRTH...everyone has the option to delay until a future drs appointment which many people decide to do.
We're doing all of them, although delayed an hour or so. The reasoning for eye drops and vit K have been covered by a few PPs.
My job is high risk exposure for Hep B, and I don't retain immunity from the vaccine - so although I currently have some, there's no telling how long it'll last (I've had the series repeatedly). Therefore, I want the babe to have as much immunity as possible before I go back to work in the event that I'm exposed and no longer have immunity. I'd certainly hate for ME to cause an exposure.
Why would anyone opt out of procedures that could protect the health of their children if there is no harm in providing them? I'm baffled by this.
The question is if there is no harm...and there are studies which show there could be. Each vaccination is different but we've done a lot of research so far and not everything offered is risk free. It's just a personal choice and I totally understand both sides.
this is an interesting article i found during my research...
and this. I really do not want all that in my newborn.
These treatments are not risk free. I am weighting the risks on both sides and doing what I believe is best.
I'm with ya.
exactly.
link wont work?
Sorry! I don't know how that happened
here:
https://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/skip-that-newborn-vitamin-k-shot/