I had a position check ultrasound earlier this week and they measured my baby and her fluid levels etc... Turns out she is a little small, weighing approx. 4 lbs 10 oz at 36 weeks and 2 days. They did some additional tests. The doctor came and spoke to me and my husband, explaining that our daughter was in the 9th percentile for her weight. They did additional testing to check my placenta and her activity, and she is perfectly healthy from what they can tell at this point.
However, due to her small size, they wanted to keep tabs on her by starting twice weekly non stress tests and another fluid check in a week, then probably a growth check in 2 weeks. She had her first NST Friday and passed with flying colors.
I'm not overly concerned, seeing as how DH and I were both small babies, my siblings were all small (5 lbs ish) and two of my sisters kids were smaller too (5 lbs, 7 lbs, 4 lbs). Also, since she has passed her tests so far, I really should not worry.
I just have that lingering "mom worry" and wanted to see who else is going through the same thing. What has your dr explained to you about it? My dr never said she had IUGR, but that's what WebMD or some other medical site said they term babies in utero under the 10th percentile...
The nurse who did the NST said if she fails the NST in 20 minutes, they will go for 40 minutes, and if she still fails she will go for a biophysical profile. If she does not pass that then I will probably be induced. My dr said basically the same thing, but also added that if I do not deliver on my own by 39 weeks and she is still small, they may just induce me due to her small size... (Don't know how I feel about that- unless there is a true problem, I would rather not be induced.)
Any input?

Re: IUGR/Small babies
Oh and my doc sent me to LD to get the steroid shot for her lungs. So in case she does need to come out next week then her lungs will be more prepared. And about being induced, i dont like the idea but if she cant grow properly inside and can grow better outside then i dont care. Whatever is best for her.
Was the growth ultrasound just routine or did your OB want it because you were measuring small? I've been measuring fine, and the small weight was incidental.
Sorry bad punctuation. On phone.
Mine seems to just be small overall, since they didn't point out one body part being smaller than the other. Her fluid level was good though, so I guess it is just her weight.
So your dr doesn't measure your fundal height?
And to the pp whose friend was induced, were there other reasons for induction or just weight? 5 lbs doesn't seem that small to me.
I am in the exact same boat. We have asymmetrical iugr with the abdomen measuring 3 wks behind at the 8th percentile for the last couple of weeks. My dr is monitoring and have me resting 2 to 3 hours a day. If nothing changes, he will let me cook until week 39, if it gets worse, then they'll induce.
Im on my phone, how far along are you?
Interesting. Wonder why one body part would grow slower than the rest? Did they say anything about why that could be?
Did your drs give you a weight estimate?
FX that your baby continues to grow. I don't know why my OB doesn't want to try for week 39. Hes giving me week 37 at the latest. And he estimated her weight to be around 4lbs 5oz
4lb and 5 oz at 34 weeks?? Your baby is almost as big as mine and I am almost 37 weeks... (my ticker is 2 days off...) But I guess you have a different situation completely because of her fluid level and small tummy...
Your situation sounds like symmetrical iugr, the whole body is small. Asymmetrical is where only the tummy is small.
Yeah I always google more than I should
That's interesting advice from your dr. I wondered about eating/nutrition being a factor, like, for me I know that my placenta is functioning properly but my entire pregnancy I have not been a big eater, up until recently. I could not stomach much. And so, I haven't gained much weight but I was also overweight pre-pregnancy so I thought it was fine. My OB told me that even if I didn't eat much that babies tend to get what they need, so I didn't really need to worry about it unless I couldn't eat for 3 days... Now I am wondering about that... I do take a very good prenatal vitamin and DHA, and vitamin D... so at least someof the nutritional stuff is covered there, but I admittantly do not eat great (health wise)... I try but I pretty much just eat what I want and I can't help but wonder if that may have contributed to her small size. Also, I work a very stressful job and long hours, and only get about 7 hours sleep a night I think... unless i'm off work.
Do they anticipate any problems when your baby is born? Like did they say anything about long term effects from it?
Oh wow, good info to have. So she was dropping weight each month? What was her birth weight at 37 weeks?
Oh that's awesome! I'm glad she was ok. I have a niece who had IUGR but she was always like below 0 percentile my sister said... And she has developmental delays and low muscle tone. She is such a sweetie. At 4 years old she is learning to say words and is not yet potty trained. She sees a speech therapist, occupational therapist, etc etc...... And was 4lbs at 37 weeks but was born at a gestational age of 35 weeks so she had stopped growing.... I know my situation is different from my sisters and I anticipate my baby will be like your first, and do just fine once she is born since right now they see no problems, she's just small.
If they discover genuine IUGR, it is dangerous for the baby to remain on the inside as they have stopped getting the nutrients they need to survive. Usually they can see if there is a cord flow problem on the ultrasound causing the low weight/pause in growth and I believe they did see that with my friend. And for weight comparison, her son was born at 36 weeks and was 5lbs 12oz...so 5lbs at 37 weeks was still considered small.
I see an MFM and always measured ahead at more than 60th percentile until a month ago. Now we are under 40 overall and at 8 for the abdomen. I have mthfr and anticardiolipin something or other so I'm guessing my placenta is starting to crap out. Hopefully it can hold strong a few more weeks.
DD has consistently measured small so I'm having monthly growth ultrasounds and they also started NSTs this past week. So far she's passed with flying colors and she looks fine, just small.
If it was me, I would push hard against inducing early for size unless they know for sure there is something going on with baby that would make it safer for them to be outside than inside. I know the case with IUGR is that at a certain point they are typically better off being outside the womb so they induce early.
I asked my OB if their concern was IUGR and she said that yes, initially it was but that as long as DD keeps growing and doesn't start falling being or stop growing, then she's likely just small but that they want to keep an eye on her any way.
Some babies are small for no reason...same for outside babies. Some are just smaller than others, someone has to be at the bottom of the growth chart, you know?
Yeah I agree, I don't want induction unless she is in potential danger... They said she is totally healthy as far as they can tell, just small... I guess time and testing will tell if she continues to do well, or not. I hope I just go naturally before any problems come up- then I will know her birthday is just "meant to be" and not feel like I am going against nature and possibly putting her more at risk by my own decision.