My husband's family has a tradition of having only one cake for their children's first birthday parties. They let the baby put their hands in it and eat it, and then they cut it up and serve the same cake to the guests (they only have cousins and aunts and uncles there). I am pretty sure they cut out the part that the baby stuck their hands in.
Assuming that they do cut out the part the baby stuck their hands in, would you still eat the cake?
I personally think it's gross, and have been telling my husband that I will be making a small cake for DS and then a regular sized one for guests at DS's first birthday party. He gets a little sad about that, but I'm not going to serve guests food that a baby has possibly drooled on or touched.
Re: Would you eat the cake?
This. I would also show DH how cute smash cakes can be...I totally think they are the way to go.
We put a mini cupcake in front of my daughter and blew out the candle. She still made a mess even with the mini cupcake. And everyone else got mini cupcakes for themselves.
I like your idea of doing a smaller cake for your son and a regular cake for your guests.
If I was served with it I'd probably accept it to not seem grossed out, had a minuscoulus bite and then "forget" it somewhere
Anyhow, yes, it's pretty gross. Make LO his own smash cake or cupcake and have a separate cake for everyone else
This is a good alternative. Or something my cousins do - they cut the middle of the cake out - like a circle of it. And the birthday kid gets that. Everyone else gets a slice cut from the remaining outside.
I would eat it, but I"m not a germ-a-phobe at all. My LO gives me slobery kisses all the time anyway. Plus it's just family.
Having said that we're definitely doing a smash cake/cupcake.