October 2013 Moms

Insurance Posts: Why Not Univeral Care?

For those on mobile: the full title is "Insurance Posts: Why Not Universal Care?"

The more these the insurance posts that pop up, the less I get/understand the rejection of universal health care in the US.

I'm an American - grew up without health insurance for a good part of the time - and now living in Germany. We have universal health care that is a percentage of our income up to a maximum amount.

My miscarriage cost me nothing beyond my very reasonable monthly insurance payment (375euro and I'm at the max). My first pregnancy, birth, and post-natal care cost my monthly insurance payment and 265euros. That included:

  • U/S at every appointment (100 euros for extra U/S)
  • 6 weeks leave at full-pay prior to PJ's birth
  • all diagnostic tests
  • birthing prep course
  • 3 day stay in the hospital
  • acupuncture (65 euros)
  • induced birth with epidural
  • 5 lactation consultant appointments
  • midwife to my home at least 10 times after the birth
  • rented hospital breast pump (100 euros for 3 months)
  • 8 weeks leave at full-pay after PJ's birth
  • 12 months leave at 67% pay between my husband and I (we shared the leave)

My appointments take place more often, with less of a wait that it seems is the case for most of you, considering I'm not high-risk.

So help me - what's the problem?

   image

Re: Insurance Posts: Why Not Univeral Care?

This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"