I'm getting a little nervous. This baby has been a lot more active than DS was. DS seemed "normal" to me in the womb with long, quiet periods as well as periods of frequent movement. When he came out, he turned out to be VERY active and demanding. He's not hyper but he.is.always.busy.
This one doesn't seem to have any long, quiet periods. Sure, there are breaks here and there, but much fewer and farther between than with DS. I have not had any moments like I did with DS where I wondered where the kicks and wiggles were. They're pretty much always there.
So...yeah. If there's a direct relationship here, I am so screwed. Ha.
Re: Does active baby in womb = active baby later?
I've said the same thing!! My DS1 was "normal" active.. stubborn, too! Would not move if someone was trying to feel him!! LOL. But, like you described.. had his active moments, and then long stretches of quiet, too. He, also, was a hi
it was true for me--my oldest was an active baby in utero and still is; my youngest was pretty mellow in utero and definitely has low activity levels.
there may be a correlation but it's not a guarantee as your experience with your first child h