data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f45d/9f45df6294943d58f56c10757a665ea48c9a7ca4" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"
Nice hypocrisy.
I cant stick around to discuss, but thought you guys might be interested. The gist of the article is this:
But when it came to mounting a defense in the Stodghill case, Catholic Health?s lawyers effectively turned the Church directives on their head. Catholic organizations have for decades fought to change federal and state laws that fail to protect ?unborn persons,? and Catholic Health?s lawyers in this case had the chance to set precedent bolstering anti-abortion legal arguments. Instead, they are arguing state law protects doctors from liability concerning unborn fetuses on grounds that those fetuses are not persons with legal rights.
Re: Unbelievable
Eta: I do love when it's so obvious though.
First of all, I'm so sorry for that father, child and family... really sad.
bbbbuuuttt, maybe I miss understand the law but isn't the church saying "hey, we've tried to say unborn people have rights, we keep getting told they have no rights... and now you want to sue for an unborn person's rights? no way."
Of course. Granted, I have no idea how the Church would see this case, it's possible that this Hospital will get some strong words from their diocese.
but if Church is okay with it- I'd have issues.
Well said.