Hi there, long time lurker, first time poster. I got a positive quad screen result for down syndrome and now need to decide how to proceed. The actual result is 1 in 256, which I understand is still very good odds -- the OB explained that it is "positive" only because it is less than the average for my age (37), which is 1 in 270. She said I can just proceed with the 20 week ultrasound in her office and see if there are any soft markers, or she can refer me to a perinatologist for a level II ultrasound. I'm inclined to proceed as originally planned, but my husband thinks we should see the specialist. Frankly, I'm a little worried about the cost -- our insurance doesn't cover ultrasounds (though we'll probably get an "adjustment" to the full cost), and I have no idea how expensive it could be at a peri's office.
Any thoughts on this? I kind of wish I hadn't gotten the quad screen done at this point, but what's done is done.
Re: quad screen results
6/20/11 mc @ 5wks
10/19/11 mc @ 17wks- Trisomy 18
IUI #1 4/26/12 BFN
Moving on to IVF in July
37 with DOR...fabulous
ER 7/14/12 6R 5F, ET 7/17 3 embies, beta #1 7/26: 147, beta #2 7/28: 326, beta#3 7/30: 422...ugh, beta#4 7/31: 607...hopeful, beta #5 8/2: 1280, beta #6 8/7: 7184 and u/s shows 1 possibly 2 sacs! 8/14 2 beautiful heartbeats! 9/24 we are TEAM BLUE!!!!!
It only cost me $235 OOP because the makers of the test want to build their case for the test being a better value to the medical field and to consumers, so if your insurance doesn't pay for it, they eat the cost except for the $235 (or is it $253, I can't remember and I transpose numbers often).
To me, the results were conclusive and I felt like it was a wiser investment all the way around. I'm glad I did it.
Good luck, whatever you guys decide. I'm 38, and my "odds" of having a DS baby were less than 1%.
<br /> My Ovulation Chart</a>
BFP #1 - missed m/c 4.18.11 found @8w3d, d&c @13w
BFP #2 blighted ovum found 8.2011 @8w, misoprostol
BFP#3 - missed m/c 6.11.12 @ 9w3d, d&c revealed extra chromosome 15
BFP#4 8.10.12, DD born 4/26/13
I agree with this. The MT21 is more accurate than the quad screen. Also, if you think you might terminate if there were a problem, I wouldn't wait until a 20-week ultrasound. I did the NT scan + bloodwork at 13 weeks and it came back great for my age (1 in 474, I think it was), but I also did the MT21 just to reassure myself.
Over-40 parents...what we lack in vigor, we make up for with cunning.
It can be costly at the MFM. I see one.
Personally, if it was me (and considering cost as well), I would just do the u/s with the OB. A lot of times they can pick it up with u/s. Unless you are going to terminate, it is what it is...
It can be costly at the MFM. I see one.
Personally, if it was me (and considering cost as well), I would just do the u/s with the OB. A lot of times they can pick it up with u/s. Unless you are going to terminate, it is what it is...
And sending lots of hugs to you!
1 in 256 is still less than 0.5% chance. It helped me tremendously to think of it in those terms, since 1 in 256 sounds at first like it would happen TONS of times but really it's less than 0.5%....
<br /> My Ovulation Chart</a>