"My feeling is if you have a house and a child together, what's the downside of making it official? I view both a home and a child as far, far greater commitments than getting married."
I just wanted to note that this is a crazy thought process. I mean, have you seen the divorce rate? You can have shared custody and you can sell a house...going thru a divorce is MUCH more difficult. Like I said, we aren't young and careless, we want to get married once and b/c we did things in reverse doesn't mean that we should get married b/c we had a kid. We don't own a house (I don't know where you saw me say that) we do have a child together. We've discuessed marriage and it isn't like it's out of the question. IMHO, marriage is the ultimate commitment.
ETA:
Here is the link to the original topic.
https://community.thebump.com/cs/ks/forums/thread/70432084.aspx
Re: Lucky Dad
I somewhat agree...we didn't get pregnant on purpose. I will hang my head in shame and admit that I was not being responsible when we got pregnant. We weren't even dating. So, we didn't "agree" in a formal way of thinking, to get pregnant. Yes, when 2 adults have unprotected sex, you do "agree" that it could happen. But, it wasn't in the hopes of making a baby.
Now, we do love each other very much and we do live together...just haven't made that marriage commitment, just yet.
I don't think you're getting what I'm saying and what I orginally posted for him to come back with that response!
Let me fill you in on the time line of events. I'm 33 and my SO is 32.
-Got drunk and had sex with a guy I was dating for less than 2 weeks and got KU. (Yes, this was stupid and we knew better)
-Had the baby
-Moved in together in an apt. Not a house = no mortgage.
Now, do you undestand. We didn't have a kid on purpose, therefore making it impossible to "agree to have a child together." Yes, I could have had an abortion or given the baby up for adoption, so in a sense we agreeed to have this baby. But it wasn't until afterwards that we did that.
In order of level of committment, from greatest to least:
Having kids
Purchasing a house
Getting married
There is no way marriage is a bigger committment than having kids.
Unable to even.
********************
You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK. Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.
You have totally turned this into an arguement about marriage vs baby, which is a bigger commitment. That isn't what this is about AT ALL!!
LD's comment that struck a cord with me was this:
"what's the downside of making it official"
My response to that is...why do we have to make it official. We don't have to get married in order to make things official. Marriage is a big commitment (so is having a baby) but we aren't going to get married just b/c we had a baby. Does that make sense to you now? I'm not trying to be snarky, just trying to get you to understand why this started out as a debate.
And, as PPs said, regardless of what the order of events was, having a child is a lifelong commitment. While the traditional wedding vows say til death do us part, the divorce rate shows that that one is easy enough to get around. Once you pop that baby out, there's no divorcing the baby and no cutting the father out, unless you or he decides to sign away parental rights, which can have MUCH bigger implications.
You must have skimmed over where I said that we are talking about marriage now and will eventually get married. We just didn't want to do it b/c everyone else has the mentality of "get married you had a baby." When we get married it will be b/c we love each other and not b/c we had a baby.
Oh hai, I'm back from lunch.
As long as you guys are both happy with your marital status, I don't really care what you do. I realize some people have very different approaches and opinions about marriage and weddings than I do, and everyone has to decide what is best for them.
I mostly interact with men, so I have heard a lot of badmouthing of marriage in general. It's truly weird to me that there are people who have been with their partner for five or seven years and have kids or property and generally get along and yet don't want to "tie themselves down". Like, it's really just silly to me when people are effectively married yet don't want to make that leap into just doing it.
Seriously, I don't really judge you or people in your situation. I've been alive long enough to know everyone has to walk their own path in life and you can never really understand someone else's situation fully. I've just heard waaaay too many silly excuses from other guys why they won't just marry their baby-mama even when they plan to stay with her for the long haul.
Hey, these days it's on the internet. It's like naked pictures. Once it's out there, it's very hard to undo.
Nobody cares if you get married or not. You two are bound by a larger commitment than marriage anyway now for the rest of your lives.
Really. No one cares if you got married first, had kids first, etc. You have a kid. That commitment trumps "im not marrying till we are inlove!!!! have u seen divorce rates?!?!?"
Glad you guys are in love enough now to make a commitment.
Oh wait.
Edit: I think she called LD out because he has a penis. Hater.
Hey now. She called me out cuz I'm an opinionated buttmonkey. Let's not bring our penises into this discussion.
And I hope it's clear that I don't necessarily think "you're pregnant, so now you have to get married!"
I just find it funny and confusing when people who essentially are married in all but having the actual papers seem inclined to drag their feet on actually marching to the altar/courthouse. I do think having a kid is *A* factor in favor of getting married. But clearly, clearly, clearly not everyone who has a kid together should be married to each other.
Your opinion matters to me.