So are you guys going to write a birth plan? I wrote one up a few months ago but its more like a short list of my wishes than "Lights must be dimmed from the time I'm dialated at a 3 to 8" and ridiculous stuff like that.
But, I'm certainly don't want to walk in with my birth plan and upset the nurses or staff thinking that I don't trust their professional judgement.
Re: Birth Plan?
My hospital paperwork came with a checklist of things I want/prefer, I was really surprised.
The only things I want are skin-to-skin right away (with DH if I have to have a c/s since LO is still breech).
BF right away.
Tear, not cut (which cutting is not preferred at my hospital).
Epidural when I ask for it.
DH to cut cord.
Able to play my music
And no students since it's a teaching hospital, just my nurses & my OB
Is there a benefit to tearing as opposed to cutting, or is that just a personal choice? I never would've thought to specify one or the other because I just always assumed cutting is always done to prevent tearing, but I've never done this before.
ETA: I don't mean to sound judgy, if that's how I came off, and if it's too personal a question, I totally understand. I've just never heard of that and was just curious, is all.
I wrote up one last time and it was well received and followed. So I plan to use the same one this time. My hospital is known for being very low-intervention, so I think they are used to that sort of thing.
If you plan to write one I would suggest you make it brief and use bullets. Also it's a good idea to find out what's hospital policy so you are not being redundant.
My Ovulation Chart
Tears are easier to recover from. Also, episiotomies can weaken the tissues, actually causing a further tear at the end of the cut. They aren't used routinely anymore at most places, though, just for compound presentation or to make room for forceps. Like most interventions, great when needed, but best avoided IMO.
This is also why it's a good idea, in my opinion, to write a birth plan. Even if after its written you never take it to the hospital. It gives you the chance to research different practices, interventions, procedures, ect that you may never have known about. Now you know why some people choose to avoid/refuse an episiotomy. But let's say you didn't ask this question and your pushing your baby out, and your dr says "looks like we might need to do an episiotomy". That really isn't the best time to be learning what is. Yes the dr may be mentioning it and at the moment you might think "well the dr should know best..." But if it were in your birth plan that you didn't want one he/she may try other avenues first knowing that you do care weather you get one or not.
There are SO many things that are done as routine that you should learn about. And no, you shouldn't walk in with something super strict becuause you're probably setting yourself up for disappointment but to at least know what's going on, what certain terms mean and so on is probably a good idea. Be an informed patient : that's a smiley btw.
I hear all the time the remark that people who come in with super strict birth plans ALWAYS end up with a c section but I truely don't believe that at all. There's no way that EVERYONE of them end up with surgery just because they are picky. In fact that says a lot about the hospital and the drs if that's true....
I'm not saying this just to you : , another smiley, in general I think it's a good idea for every person, no matter what the procedure, to learn as much as they can about what's happening.
DD#1 December '12
DD#2 New Year's Baby '15
Married 07/09
Thanks! I never really thought of it that way, but I guess, as with a lot things, letting your body do what it needs to do naturally is better. Letting it tear as much as it needs to seems to make more sense.
This is what I used as well. It gave me some things I had never considered so it was good to go through and research or ask the doctor questions.
My health plan/OB/Hospital has this birth check list they have you fill out and talk with your doctor about around 28 weeks: https://www.permanente.net/homepage/kaiser/pdf/52087.pdf
So for my first birth (hospital birth) I filled that out, and added a couple things to it (I didn't want pitocin in the 3rd stage unless necessary (standard in many hospitals, including my very pro-NB friendly one), baby's first bath to be at home, delayed cord clamping until it stopped pulsing, to take the placenta home with me, for example). I'm not doing one this time b/c I'm having a home birth and I know my MW and I are on the same page. It helps that I've only seen her throughout my pregnancy, and am guaranteed she'll be the one delivering the baby...so no need for anything written out b/c we agree on all these things.
And the whole "people with birth plans have c-sections" schtick is so ridic. Obviously, every mother's first and primary goal is a healthy baby and mother, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with research and preference in labor. The fact that there's this attempt to make anyone feel like there *is* something wrong with having preferences and doing research is just scary and oh so wrong in itself.