I was induced with DS and went into active labor after receiving cervidil. I dilated to a 4 and then I got an epidural and my OB broke my water. They started pitocin but I never dilated anymore. I have always wondered if I hadn't gotten the epi if I would have continued to dilate. Anyone get to a 10 with their first and then end in C/S. If so did it take as long to get to a 10 with your vbac? I am just wondering about labor times with a second baby in a birth canal that has never been used, would it be like a first delivery?
Re: Does a vbac delivery usually take less time than baby #1
My labor with DS was 3 hrs from SROM/first contraction to delivery.
FWIW, the nurse on Thursday was not adjusting my Pitocin as my midwife ordered and when she came to check on me about six hours after the induction started, she was not happy. The nurse was only increasing at half the rate. : I was completely exhausted by Friday when I got the epi and couldn't cope with the contractions anymore.
I didn't get to a 10 with DS before our c/s, but I was talking with my dr about this very thing this morning. She said that 2nd (and 3rd, 4th etc) babies come faster than the first because your body already knows what to do, and it doesn't matter if you only got to a 4-5 (like me) or if you got to 10 and were pushing before the c/s.
So a 2nd baby *should* be a shorter labor than the first no matter what.