My midwife today recommended getting the tdap vaccine if I haven't had it in 10 years. The last time I was vaccinated was around November or December 2002. Supposedly, whooping cough is going around and can be dangeous during pregnancy. I'm not opposed to vaccines and had my fu shot today. Mayo and the CDC say it's safe. Has anyone heard anything about this, or have any opinions? I don't want any unnecessary vaccines floating around my body, or the baby's! Thanks!
Where is my arm?!?
Due March 17, 2015
Re: Tdap during 2nd tri
Whooping cough isn't 'supposedly' going around it IS going around! I haven't heard of it being such a threat to pregnant women (though it may very well be), more of a serious threat to newborns.
I got the TDaP right after DD was born, because at the time it was not approved for pregnant women. If I wasn't up to date on it I would feel comfortable getting it during pregnancy. Evidence seems to suggest that the antibodies might pass to the baby and offer some protection after birth. We feel so strongly about this in fact, that DH was vaccinated as well as both sets of Grandparents and siblings. I have a friend who does not vaccinate and she won't be coming around until this LO has started his/her shots. Babies don't just get sick from this, they can die, I'm not taking any chances!
Where is my arm?!?
Due March 17, 2015
DS2 - Oct 2010 (my VBAC baby!)
So, don't get it then right? Well, getting it right after birth may not be good enough. It takes 2 weeks after the shot for immunity to begin. So my choices are: A. choose to allow myself and my baby to be the lab rats/guinea pigs and take it while pregnant or B. Get it right after birth and have a small window of danger where if I was exposed and caught pertussis then I could pass it to my baby.
I just wish things like this were studied and we pregnant women and mothers didn't have to make all of these hard decisions. I also wish it was studied among breastfeeding mothers because I wonder about what passes to the baby in my breastmilk if I were to get it right after birth, and what that does to a newborn's system. I am torn.
They do, to some degree. meta data. The chances of an IRB or the FDA authorizing a double blinded placebo clinical trial on a vulnerable population (pregnant women) is pretty slim to none. However, if a pregnant woman were to accidentally/on purpose get vaccinated, those cases can (and hopefully should) be tracked for adverse events.
Back when I was pg, tdap wasn't flat-out contraindicated, but it wasn't heartily recommended. I took a look at the CDC document outlining and basically the only reasons for their guidelines at the time was relative lack of data since the vaccine combo itself was relatively new, and that kind of data is not easy to come by (I think at the time it may have only been 60 something documented cases).
I chose to get it anyway during 2nd tri when I took a look at the adverse event percentages reported (nothing I would have flipped out about), the makeup of the vaccine and the duration of an active case of pertussis (not a life or death risk to a pg woman in general, but if I did get it while pg, it could take weeks to months before no longer being infectious) Both my GP and OB discussed it with me (and each other).
So yeah, it is "risk" as far as a risk assessment through clinical trials not being available, but to be honest, so is the vast majority of currently available medications, herbals and interventions done to pg women.
The CDC actually recommends that you have this vaccine while pregnant. Here's what they have to say on pregnancy and vaccinations:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/preg-guide.htm
Now don't get me wrong, I don't think the CDC knows everything or is always right on these things. I just think they're a good starting point when I have questions, and they seem to have done their homework on vaccines. They will tell you when a vaccine has risks, they just usually have deemed the benefit greater than the risk.
100% this. I will be getting the vaccine in the hospital AFTER this LO is born.
BFP #1 12/02/11, M/C 12/08/11
BFP #2 04/06/12, DD born 12/20/12
BFP #3 06/09/14, M/C 06/15/14
I've read both sides of the argument for and against it during pregnancy. I am sure you all have too. Its scary to think of risking not getting the vaccine but it gets confusing too b/c they arent 100% the immunity passes to baby if you get the shot while pregnant, they hope it does. Same for Bf'ing. There is also a concern that by having your family and friends immunized that you are causing another issue b/c a high count of the people who are included in the recent studies (who got whooping cough) were not only vaccinated but were up to date on their boosters. The issue with this is that a person can have whooping cough, get vaccinated and still pass it off to others (except they just dont have symptoms)....but Im sure, then again that the vaccine did create immunity for another large group of people.
...........and also the FDA website says it can increase the risk of SIDS.....(sigh).
Im in a brain fog over it.
I think the pamphlet you were reading is outdated. This is straight from the ACOG website:
In light of the recent increased incidence of pertussis in the United States, in 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approved recommendations for the use of the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) for pregnant women.
Now whether someone feels comfortable trusting the recommendation is up to them, but the CDC believes it is safe.
As far as wishing these things were studied more, everyone wishes that, but who is going to sign up you, me? I don't think so. They can study animals forever, but that doesn't guarantee its safety in humans.
As pp said, there is meta data. They don't do other studies because who's going to volunteer? As you stated, do you want to be the guinea pig to see if it causes problems for your fetus?
I feel like we all pregnant women right now getting the vaccine are "signing up" for the study...and just hoping for the best. Frankly, I don't love that option.
Here is the current insert on Boostrix: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/UCM152842.pdf
Here is the current insert on Adecel, https://www.vaccineshoppe.com/image.cfm?doc_id=10437&image_type=product_pdf
WHICH STATES:
"Pregnancy Category C
SO, it is up to us to decide if it is "clearly needed". There have been lots of things that have been said to be "okay" for pregnant women to have (such as antibiotics, etc) that we now know are definitely not okay and caused some damages for sure.
I am not saying that you or me or whoever shouldn't get the vaccine, just that there are risks either way and that I am very conflicted.
You are right all vaccines have their risks, pregnant or not. We all have to weigh the risks vs. the benefits. As far as it being a Category C, that is not in itself alarming to me, Tums are also a Category C! As to the insert, it goes on to say that it has been tested on pregnant animals and there were no observable adverse effects. Does that guarantee its safety for humans? No, that's where it comes down to weighing the risks and benefits.
I agree with you 100% that when pregnant women take anything we become the 'long-term studies'. Truthfully, I'm glad it wasn't approved for pregnant women when I was pregnant. The choice was made for me, I had to wait until after I had DD and this time around I don't need it because I am up-to-date on my vaccine. My point was only to say: A) contrary to what you said earlier it is approved (whether that makes it safe or not is up for debate)
you said you wished things like this were studied, and my point was to say they are studied within the limits of what would be considered morally responsible.