...that I can't stand reading the 3-6 mo board? DD is 5 months so I pop over there to read about solids and toys and to see what other babies are doing, but there are SO MANY threads about CIO and sleep training and it just makes me sad. I need to stay over here on this board
Re: Am I allowed to say...
Yeah, that's a rough patch to talk with parents that don't share your school of thought.
Hang here. We like talking about toys and solids (but a lot of us do BLW).
Natural Birth Board FAQs
Cloth Diaper Review Sheet
Yeah definitey hard work. I go to a parent group where most/the vocal ones are pro CIO.
There may be others in the group who aren't, but no one says anything.
The pro CIO crowd look at me like I'm insane when I mention bed-sharing and the like.
Luckily in a couple of years we can move onto smacking, sending children to bed without their dinner, and having them sit in one spot for hours.
Elizabeth 5yrs old Jane 3yrs old
This was me before I had DD. We have good friends that bed-share with their little ones and I always thought they were crazy and I always said to myself that I would never do that. Then DD was born and I changed all of my feelings towards having her in bed with me. I couldn't listen to my sweet little newborn cry and there was no way I was getting up every hour so I brought her into bed with us. I loved it! She is now in her own bed but I do miss her.
That's stinks that the women in your parent group aren't more open-minded.
Oh no. I hadn't even thought about that kind of thing, but I'm sure you're right. As PP said, I also believe that most parents try to do the right thing, and some people do try everything before CIO. I guess what gets me is how the most negative-seeming strategies (in AP terms anyway) are often the most popular ones to try
Torture? Really?
LOL! Torture?
No one likes to hear their babies cry. No one wants their babies to be upset. People do want to sleep. They want their babies to get enough sleep. Their parents, pediatricians, grandparents, friends, neighbors, busy body old ladies at church, etc are all telling them to let their baby cry. They are tired, they hear it worked, it does work, so the baby cries for a bit and then everyone sleeps. It is not for everyone, but it is certainly not torture.
I felt like I was torturing my daughter when I sat there patting her back and shushing her when she wanted me to pick her up. I was teasing her. It was awful. I did Ferber and she slept and we all stopped being cranky zombies and we are happy now. My daughter has a happy well rested Mom who has the energy to play with her. Worked for us.
good gravy...torture...really?
This is absurd. We sleep trained (Ferber's method) at 6.5 months, and it took all of one night with minimal crying (and regular check-ins) to get her STTN. No, it isn't for everyone, but it was not torture.
BFP #1 9/7/10, EDD 5/14/11, Violet born 5/27/11.
BFP #2 4/9/12, EDD 12/16/12, M/C Rory 4/24/12.
BFP #3 10/6/12, EDD 6/16/12., Matilda born 6/17/13.
Am I the only one who read this as a sarcastic poke at OP?
Right, because people who don't bed share will go ahead and do all of those things.
This right here is why this board is almost unreadable. It is incredibly ironic how many posts on this board are people worried about being "judged" for baby wearing or co-sleeping but then are so quick to make ridiculous and offensive blanket statements about non-AP mothers.
And KateLouise, what do you consider "pro CIO"? People who sleep train at all?
Married 6/28/03
Kate ~ 7/3/09 *** Connor ~ 11/11/10
4 miscarriages: 2007, 2009, 2013, 2014
*~*~*~*~*
No more TTC for us. We are done, and at peace, as a family of 4.
"Suffering has been stronger than all other teaching, and has taught me to understand what your heart used to be. I have been bent and broken, but – I hope – into a better shape.” — Charles Dickens