Unless or until you have a degree in obstetrics, don't tell the pregnant lady who has politely asked to opt out of walking through your fancy new machine that it is safer than getting an ultrasound. She *will* complain to your supervisor.
me - 41 (dx: DOR); DH - 53 (no problems);
7/18/09 - married!;
8/4/09 - BFP on first (real)try;
9/14/09 - missed m/c; 9/15/09 - d&c;
11/09 - 3/10 - 4 natural cycles = BFN;
4/10 - dx hyperthyroidism caused by Graves' disease;
6/10 - thyroidectomy;
7/10 - 12/10 - 1 natural and 5 medicated IUI cycles = BFN;
1/11 - new RE; dx low ovarian reserve (AMH .42;
1/26/11 -- BFP (ectopic) from IUI #6; methotrexate 2/10/11;
6/2/11 - IVF #1 = BFN;
9/12/11 - prescreening for DE;
9/15/11 - IUI #7 (unmedicated)= BFN;
11/8 - begin DE cycle (shared risk program);
12/5 - ER (5 eggs/4 mature/3 fertilized/2 left by day 5)
12/10 - ET of one 1BB blast (expanded, "fair" quality), none to freeze;
12/22 - totally shocked by +hpt; beta #1 = 413; #2 = 3952
2/14 - CVS reveals a healthy baby girl!
EDD: 8/27/12 DD born 8/31/12, 10 lbs 10 oz and perfect in every way.
Re: Dear Mr. TSA Agent....
TTC #1 since 5/10
BFP #1 7/22/11 - EDD 4/2/11 - M/C 8/15/11 (7w0d)
BFP #2 9/23/11 - EDD 6/5/12 ♥It's a Girl♥
BFP #3 2/20/13 - EDD 11/2/13 ♥It's a Girl♥
My Blog




I was flying internationally every 3 weeks for work prior to getting pregnant and found a lot of resistance when I opted out of the scanner every time. Sometimes they would put me aside and make me wait 15-20 minutes for the pat down and complain the whole time about people being stupid thinking these machines may be harmful. It depends on where you go, of course, in Canada I had no issue whatsoever and they were very polite, as Canadians most generally are. However I have nothing nice to say about the TSA agents I encountered routinely for over 3 years in New Orleans, Newark, and Philly.
To think they would question a pregnant woman doesn't surprise me much as I think the education requirements to work for TSA are nil. Not to say there are some good ones, but the majority I don't think would even qualify for a job in a convenience store.
Always stand your ground, it's your right to refuse and they MUST comply.
Agree 100%
I have gone through the scans in the interest of time before. Now I am definitely just going to submit to the pat down.
While I agree that you shouldn't be treated rudely, and it is certainly your right to refuse the airport scan without comment, the scanners really are quite safe. For the record, I also agree that TSA personnel aren't necessarily Harvard educated. However, in a coast-to-coast flight, you are exposed to 0.01?0.03 mSv of natural background radiation, and the dose limit for a single scan with the machine is 0.00025 mSv. You are going to be subject to more radiation in flight than during the scan.
A person receives more radiation from naturally occurring sources in less than an hour of ordinary living than from one screening with any general-use X-ray security system.
This link is pretty informative.
Baby Girl #2 is on her way!