The early post got me wondering: If your water hasn't broken, do hospitals require internal checks normally before they will admit you? Last time, they were more concerned with checking for amniotic fluid (and not putting their fingers in)...so I didn't get one.
But I wonder if without broken waters they have to check? Can you still refuse?
Re: Is there always internal checks for hospital check-ins?
My hospital reqired one. They wouldn't admit me until I was at least 4cm. I arrived at 3cm w/ contrax every 2-3 min. I stayed in a triage room for an hour and they checked me again. I still hadn't progressed to 4 and the nurse was debating what to do with me. I said all I wanted to do was get in the tub. She took me to a room but said, "I'm not admitting you until you're farther along." WTH? My dr came by a little while later (she was on her way to do a c/s) to check on me and said not to worry, she'd take care of getting me admitted.
I think you could refuse, but realize that they could refuse to admit you or delay admitting you until they're sure you're far enough along.
I'm not 100% sure, but it makes sense to me. They don't want to admit you too early, and of you're aiming for natural, you don't WANT to be admitted too early. I figure cervical checks are justified during labor.
At the hosp that I work at/deliver at, the only time I haven't checked a patient when admitting her for labor is if she's crowning. Otherwise, you're checked for many of the reasons above. If you're checked in the office and found to be dilating/in labor, then you're a direct admit and we don't recheck you just to admit you. If you're being admitted for something else (SROM, PIH, whatever), then you're not necessarily checked. But a routine labor admission, yep, you're checked in triage before you're officially admitted.