Wow. I realize they were preoccupied, but it's hard to imagine not knowing someone was close enough to get that shot. Thanks for reposting - I was very curious after reading the replies to the first post!
She wrote last night that she found out 3 weeks ago. No idea how she got the picture without them knowing. Does anyone here know if a nannycam would generate a pic of this quality?
She wrote last night that she found out 3 weeks ago. No idea how she got the picture without them knowing. Does anyone here know if a nannycam would generate a pic of this quality?
Ive only seen pics from a nanny cam once, but they definitely weren't that clear - not even close. But, the pics had been transferred to a cell phone and this was over 5 years ago, so I'm sure nanny cams have improved since then.
I think you would have to be drunk or high to go down on a broad in your woman's bedroom. That is also the only reason I can think of for why you wouldn't notice her standing behind you.
Could it have been a webcam somehow? I'm not technical at all, but seems if a computer was on and webcam aimed in that direction.... I don't know how you would get a still shot of that though.
And, now I am also very curious about how she took the pic. She seems so close! I assumed it was like from the doorway. She's like standing right over them! How does the girl not notice?
Stay at home mom to a house of boys: two amazing stepsons, 12 and 9, and our 4 year old.
Could it have been a webcam somehow? I'm not technical at all, but seems if a computer was on and webcam aimed in that direction.... I don't know how you would get a still shot of that though.
Some webcams can take still shots. However, it seems odd that the computer would be on and running and she'd be controlling a live application remotely and them not notice. Most nanny cams record monochrome for storage space purposes. It looked like an actual photograph because of the blur from her hand movement. Seemed odd to me that the still had her undies on. Of course, the entire situation seems pretty odd.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Seemed odd to me that the still had her undies on. Of course, the entire situation seems pretty odd.
I thought the same thing about the underwear. Very weird, especially considering that she was topless. Why leave them on?
I'm wondering if the guy and the mistress were recording themselves and the fiancee found the video and this was the safest shot to post on FB (although, HELLO, if this was the cleanest, what else was on there?!)
ETA: Jenni, I wish you could go ask all these questions and report back to us. LOL
My question is, how could you stumble upon this situation and your first thought be, "I am going to take a picture" ?
You're assumng she was surprised by this.
I bet she was suspicious for a while and was just waiting to catch them in the act. She probably heard them the minute she walked into her house so she quietly walked into her bedroom with her phone camera ready.
My question is, how could you stumble upon this situation and your first thought be, "I am going to take a picture" ?
You're assumng she was surprised by this.
I bet she was suspicious for a while and was just waiting to catch them in the act. She probably heard them the minute she walked into her house so she quietly walked into her bedroom with her phone camera ready.
Re: OK, you win, NSFW repost
OMG!
she looks bored lol.
That is toofucking funny. Who does that?! (posting it on FB, I mean
)
hell of a tattoo!
whoa. So...I guess her relationship with him is over?!
uh, yeah. there's no denying that's him (if he does...lol).
nice shot.
WHOA
Ive only seen pics from a nanny cam once, but they definitely weren't that clear - not even close. But, the pics had been transferred to a cell phone and this was over 5 years ago, so I'm sure nanny cams have improved since then.
Did SHE take the picture?
Maybe she found out because they took that shot themselves and she ran across it on a computer or something.
DS - December 2006
DD - December 2008
Thank you!
And, now I am also very curious about how she took the pic. She seems so close! I assumed it was like from the doorway. She's like standing right over them! How does the girl not notice?
Ahhhh I missed it!
Some webcams can take still shots. However, it seems odd that the computer would be on and running and she'd be controlling a live application remotely and them not notice. Most nanny cams record monochrome for storage space purposes. It looked like an actual photograph because of the blur from her hand movement. Seemed odd to me that the still had her undies on. Of course, the entire situation seems pretty odd.
I thought the same thing about the underwear. Very weird, especially considering that she was topless. Why leave them on?
I'm wondering if the guy and the mistress were recording themselves and the fiancee found the video and this was the safest shot to post on FB (although, HELLO, if this was the cleanest, what else was on there?!)
ETA: Jenni, I wish you could go ask all these questions and report back to us. LOL
You're assumng she was surprised by this.
I bet she was suspicious for a while and was just waiting to catch them in the act. She probably heard them the minute she walked into her house so she quietly walked into her bedroom with her phone camera ready.
You're assumng she was surprised by this.
I bet she was suspicious for a while and was just waiting to catch them in the act. She probably heard them the minute she walked into her house so she quietly walked into her bedroom with her phone camera ready.