Hi ladies,
Sorry if this will be a duplicate post for some of you, I posted this on the C-section board as well. I have rare conditions called vulvodynia & vaginismus. For those of you who don't know what these are, in an eggshell the vulvodynia is a nerve disorder in the vaginal region causing 24/7 pain, stinging, itching, etc. The vaginismus is considered a psycological condition that manifests itself physically causing the vagina to clamp shut at any type of penetration. I was "lucky" enough to get both of them. (My baby was not conceived the natural way, in case you're wondering.)
I'm working with really great specialists for this, and my OB's office has told me I can decide how I want to give birth, but they are strongly recommending the C-section. I trust them and truly believe they have my best interest at heart. 2 reasons: a vaginal delivery could make the nerve pain worse in the long run and I could be even more miserable forever. Also, they want to check your cervix multiple times during labor and any type of internal exam is excruciating for me. So they believe a C-section will be less physically & mentally traumatizing in MY case. Me and my husband are leaning towards agreeing with them, but part of me feels like a nut for choosing to have a major, risky surgery with harder recovery and I feel like a bit of a failure for not even attempting to go vaginal. (These disorders are really hard on me emotionally.)
I know 99% of you ladies on here probably don't have any experience with these disorders....but from what I've told you....what would you do if you were me? I have time to decide - I'm only 17 weeks - but it's been weighing on my heart & mind.
Re: Doctors are letting me choose C-section or not....what to do
That sounds terrible to deal with! I'd have a c-section no questions. I am having one. I've seen a ton of c-sections because I work on L&D and I'm not scared in the least (have been through a ton of other surgeries in my life though). I'm more scared of a vaginal birth to be honest. I'm having twins so pretty much good chance that I would need one anyways. I would rather not try vaginal either as with my luck the first twin would come out then the other would turn and I'd need an emergency c-section. Plus the second twin won't have the stress of the vaginal birth. I also have prior health issues that would make it hard for me to go through a strenuous labor. So all and all, c-section for me would be best.
Don't ever feel like a failure!!
And you are certainly NOT a failure. Plenty of women have C-Sections every day. It's not a failure because it produces healthy infants. That's the only goal here.
I just did a little reading of my own to better understand the disorders. You learn something new everyday, I had no idea either existed.
If I were in your position, I would have the C-Section, if only not to make either condition worse. You will not be a failure if you cannot give birth vaginally. Each of our bodies have their limitations. There are many things that can happen, either during pregnancy or during delivery that can cause any woman to be unable to do so, and in the end all that truly matters is a healthy baby and a healthy mother.
You didn't mention if there is a possibility of putting your baby in danger, but reading this "causing the vagina to clamp shut at any type of penetration" makes me wonder if that might happen during either the cervical checks or while you are pushing.
DD #1 born 4/1/2012
My Married Bio
You're getting a PM!
I had an elective* c/s with DS and honestly I was off the heavy duty pain meds before going home and I was off the advil 2 days later. I was able to do stairs and I was driving by 2 weeks pp. I went in knowing that I would more than likely end up with a c/s and was fully prepared for it.
*I say elective because I was given the option the day I was admitted to the hospital at 39w. It was either an induction or c/s. They did one last u/s and the midwife said to me, honestly, I would go with the c/s. Her reasons were I was not dilated, not effaced, not having any contractions and due to his size I could end up in a c/s 36 hours later. I have no regrets, he ended up being 10 lbs, 22" with 15" head.
I once had a picture until the trolls showed up.
TTC #1 7/08 PCOS dx 8/28/04 Met 1000 mg and Clomid cycles 1-4 1/6/09-5/2/09 BFN
Clomid 100mg 6/4/09=O'd=BFP on 6/29/09! Beta@14DPO 70.8 Beta@16DPO 152. EDD 3/7/10.
First u/s on 7/13/09 @6w0d heard and saw heartbeat 102 bpm.
K M #1 arrived via c/s 3/1/10 10 lbs, 22 inches long at 39 weeks.
Surprise expecting #2. Med-free BFP on 8/1/11! Beta@15DPO 58.2 Beta@17DPO 198.3 Beta@23DPO 2338. EDD 4/9/12
K M #2 arrived via c/s 3/19/12 9 lbs 2 oz, 21 inches long at 37 weeks.
"If we weren't all crazy we would go insane."