So how common is circumcision in the Bay Area and Northern California in general?
Reason I ask is last night I SIL (who generally lacks any tact, manners, and she has no children) was at a family function and said "No one has their kids circumcises in the Bay Area anymore and its been that way for years" and "Only rednecks still mutilate thier kids". I certainly don't think she is correct, but her statement had me wondering just how common it is here. My DS is and I really cannot beleive she would say that in mixed company.
So is it still at least somewhat common here?
[Poll]
Re: How Common is Circumcision?
I don't have a son, but my friend just had a boy and delivered in SF. She was surprised that no one even asked her at the hospital about circumcision. She and her husband opted not to do it, but assumed the hospital would ask. I'm not sure if it's like this everywhere, but it seems the hospital has a policy of not asking unless you bring it up.
My dad is a urologist, and has seen a decrease in circumcision, though it is certainly still done.
Hmm...Interesting results so far. The comments seem to indicate that its not all that common anymore, but the poll results say that 88.9% are. Small sample size, but still interesting.
I wonder if there is variance between different regions in the Bay Area or among different socio-economic groups.
Our pediatrician (part of PAMF) said that about 20% of the boys in her practicer are circumcised. So it's not "nobody" but from what I've encountered (including what my pedi said) it's on the decline.
She also said that the general feeling among the parents choosing not to is that their boys can always choose to do it later, but you can't put it back once it's gone. So there's that...
ETA - we're in SJ. My cousin is in Seattle and her son is not circ'd.
Seems like everyone's experience is all over the spectrum.
Does it vary by region within the Bay Area and Norcal (ie indivudal city or couty)? Seems like quite a large varriance between pediatric groups.
So I guess this mightbe a better question to ask: What is the status of your LO and where do you live? I am sarting to think the answer to that question is probably just as inconsistent.
NorCalMOMS bio* NorCalBOTB* babywearingBIO
Harmony Doula
I live in Sacramento and both my boys are circumcised.
I think as a very wide generalization yes, circumcision is less common in the Bay Area than say, the Midwest. I, for one, though, don't believe that it's even 50/50... I think it's still the case that most American boys are circumcised. (And fantastic is yours aren't, it's just my opinion!)
I don't have a son but if we did, he would be circumcised.
ETA: I'm in San Jose
having just left where you are, it's not the trend anymore. Our pedi office had gone from something like 25-30% when H was born up to nearly 50% when we left. Also just and fyi, it's an uber hot topic on the local board. so while it's def on the rise to not circ, people are super strong feeling one way or the other.
These results are interesting. Most of the comments say no, but the overwhelming majority say yes in the poll.
Anyone think it might actually be relatively common, but mothers who opt to have their LO circumcised are just less likely to admit it for fear of being told they are terrible motherrs?
I think you're on to something. When we were researching it, I came across a well-written article with both sides to the coin (one son uncircumcised and is now a teen and fine, the other uncircumcised but had to be circ'd in elementary school because of an infection, and one circ'd at birth.) I commented about how it was nice to hear both sides without any judgement because we were still researching and then said something about how it's ultimately up to my husband because I do not have a penis.
Some random internet person wrote the most horrendous attack to me about how the mere fact that we were still on the fence was tantamount to child abuse and on and on. I just remember being 8ish months pregnant and sitting there crying because of what this stranger had said...and we were ultimately in agreement!
I think that in real life, most parents don't really care if you've circ'd your son or not - but on the internet people feel more free to be asshats, so moms are more hesitant to share.
Wow, sorry a stranger did that to you. That kinda reminds me what my SIL said on Friday night. A completely judgmental statement, but she really is just an abrasive personality, so nothing she ever says gets to me (DH is another story, he is constantly telling his brother that he married a "crazy chic").
I agree with you that I really don't know of anyone who really cares all that much about what another mother chose for her DS. It really does seem some people have become very vocal on the subject (particularly the people who are against it) with very emotional arguments that really don't have any basis in reality. I don't really know of anyone who really thinks that having it done is damaging to the extent that circumcised men cannot enjoy sex. Conversely, I also don't know anyone who honestly believes that having it done will somehow prevent all disease.
you said it.
I totally agree that i is a very personal decision. It is just sad that there is so much judgement in regards to this decision.
With all the judgmental attitudes out there on this topic, has anyone ever regretted their decision after the fact based on what others have said?
NorCalMOMS bio* NorCalBOTB* babywearingBIO
Harmony Doula
My son is circumcised and while I feel totally comfortable with that decision, I don't like to discuss it on The Bump. I had one unfortunately situation at a GTG while I was PG where someone flat out said to me "Of course your not circumcising, that's just for aesthetics." That was enough for me to keep my mouth shut after that.
Clearly that person hadn't seen the multitudes of historical evidence that it's not just "aesthetic" (it's not a magic immunity bullet, but it's not like getting your ears pierced.) I'm sorry they said that to you.
br
br>
br
br>