Parenting

Would you participate in this school fundraiser?

Outdoor photo session at the school grounds (beautiful, lots of trees, the actual school wouldn't be in the photos), 20-30 digital images, can include family as well as the student, with 2/3 of the fee going to the school to replace the aging playground for the Spring of 2012.

The school does not offer traditional school photos.

C ~ Spring 2006 Baby! Photobucket
«1

Re: Would you participate in this school fundraiser?

  • How much is it? They are doing something similar at my daughter's pre-school. You can donate $25 or more and you get a couple of shots and the photographer emails you the pics and you can print out as many as you want. I say yes!
    Julian David 8/7/06 and Isabella Mia 5/14/09
  • Loading the player...
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • totally depends on the actual cost.l
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Depends on the cost, but it's definitely more interesting than selling pizzas or Yankee Candles.

     

    AKA KnittyB*tch
    DS - December 2006
    DD - December 2008

    imageimage
  • Depending on how much, I would!
    -Sarah, Ryan 10.26.05 & Caleb 5.2.07 image
  • $75
    C ~ Spring 2006 Baby! Photobucket
  • Yes. But only if I could visit the photographers site and verify their work and shooting style prior to signing up. Also, I'd want to know if they were going to be edited/corrected/touched up in any way.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • For that price, absolutely. And I am one of the most frugal people you will ever meet. :-)

    AKA KnittyB*tch
    DS - December 2006
    DD - December 2008

    imageimage
  • Yeah, I would. I'd pay that much for a regular mini photo session, so it would be a huge bonus to me if 2/3 was going to the school.
    She's crafty - and she's just my type.
  • Yes, I would.  It seems very reasonable to me.
  • No. Photography is not something I'm willing to spend much money on. I'm one who does the specials where you get a package of a bunch of prints from the same pose for $10-$15. And beyond that, we are happy enough with the pictures we take ourselves.

  • I'd need to see the photographer's website/work.  I know some folks who hold themselves out as being professional, family photographers, and I really don't think their work is of professional quality.  If I liked what I saw, I would.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Depends on how much, but I would do it if the price was right.
    Audrey Elizabeth 11-11-06 image
  • It would depend on how much I like the photographer's style. We usually spend around $50 at Sears, so really that's a great deal. I'd have to convince DH who is much stingier than me.
    Annalise Marie 05.29.06
    Charlotte Ella 07.16.10
    Emmeline Grace 03.27.13
  • Provided I liked the photographers work absolutely. I hate studio shots, so that would be far more to my taste than "school pictures." And I'd rather that than some overpriced wrapping paper!
    imageimageBaby Birthday Ticker TickerBaby Birthday Ticker TickerBaby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • Yes, if I could see the photographer's site first. If not, then I'd need some sort of money-back guarantee in the case they weren't good.
    S- March 09 E- Feb 12 L- May 15


  • I LOVE that overpriced wrapping paper.  I freaked out last year when I ran out of it and had to use regular store wrapping paper (which is a freaking waste!)!  Hate it.

    Anyway....

    our school is doing this but it's $20 for the sitting.  Which I thought was cheap.  $75 is reaching the "Eh, I don't know if I would!" category for me.  Heck, I'm not even doing it for $20!  LOL But that's because everyone that does it has access to ALL the photos AND they didn't even tell us WHO the photographer is!?! 

  • Seriously? Money back guarantees and whatever over what amounts to a $25 session? Most of the money goes to the school. 20-30 shots for $25 sounds like a deal to me. There are bound to be at least a couple of decent shots out of that.

    AKA KnittyB*tch
    DS - December 2006
    DD - December 2008

    imageimage
  • imageJodi&Joe:

    I LOVE that overpriced wrapping paper.  I freaked out last year when I ran out of it and had to use regular store wrapping paper (which is a freaking waste!)!  Hate it.

    Anyway....

    our school is doing this but it's $20 for the sitting.  Which I thought was cheap.  $75 is reaching the "Eh, I don't know if I would!" category for me.  Heck, I'm not even doing it for $20!  LOL But that's because everyone that does it has access to ALL the photos AND they didn't even tell us WHO the photographer is!?! 

    $20?  Seems like next to nothing for the school to earn, and absolutely nothing for the photographers time!

    C ~ Spring 2006 Baby! Photobucket
  • See, I wouldn't spend even $25 for a session with a photographer whose work was crappy.  So I'd still want to see his/her work beforehand.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageAnnapolisLari:

    Seriously? Money back guarantees and whatever over what amounts to a $25 session? Most of the money goes to the school. 20-30 shots for $25 sounds like a deal to me. There are bound to be at least a couple of decent shots out of that.

    Totally agree.  It is $75 with $50 of that going to the school.  It is definitely worth the risk in my opinion.  An amateur with a nice camera could do well enough to justify that cost.  Surely there would be at least one or two you like and you would have a nice family photo and have contributed to the school.  They are outside so no need to worry about a cheesy/cheap looking background.  I would do it without a second thought.

    my read shelf:
    Jessica's book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)
  • Lari - I missed that part. Your right - $25 is NOTHING.  Heck, I spend $100 on the crappy school photos!  LOL

    Ash - I thought the same thing!  $20 is peanuts.  The photographer has to be donating their time (I'm guessing)!?!?!

  • imageAnnapolisLari:

    Seriously? Money back guarantees and whatever over what amounts to a $25 session? Most of the money goes to the school. 20-30 shots for $25 sounds like a deal to me. There are bound to be at least a couple of decent shots out of that.

    I was thinking the same thing...

    Audrey Elizabeth 11-11-06 image
  • I'd definitely do it.  

    And, ironically, we're doing fundraisers (trash bags and cookbooks) for a  new playground as well. ;)

     

  • I think 20-30 shots is way too many.  I would give 10 on a disk and have more of the proceeds go to the school.  You could make the cost a little lower then.  The COG's will be super low for you, so you could afford to lower the cost and then hopefully more families would participate.  I think you could get a good turn out from something like this.

    ETA:  I'd do a session with my own kids or a friends beforhand and put together a simple and cheap marketing piece to be sent home with all the kids.  You could even refer them to your blog so they could see the full session (ie what they would get).

  • No, I wouldn't because spending $75 on photography isn't in my budget. However, I think it's a great idea and definitely better than wrapping paper or the usual junky sales.
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • I would definitely do that!
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I would totally do that.
    imageimage
    Alex (11/14/06) and Nate (5/25/10)
    "Want what you have, do what you can, be who you are." - Rev. Forrest Church
  • imageAnnapolisLari:

    Seriously? Money back guarantees and whatever over what amounts to a $25 session? Most of the money goes to the school. 20-30 shots for $25 sounds like a deal to me. There are bound to be at least a couple of decent shots out of that.

     Well, but it's not $25. It's still $75 being spent out of a family's budget and that's a big chunk of money for a lot of families. 

    I think the success will depend a lot of the demographics of the school, to be honest.  If it's a situation where most of the families are fairly affluent, then they are going to see this as something really great - $75 doesn't break the bank, they've made a nice donation to the school, and they get some photos out of it.

    But for a lot of families, $75 is a lot of money to spend - even if it's a great deal overall and a lot goes back to the school. It's still $75.  Some families would be more likely to participate if the package were cheaper with a smaller split going to the school - like $50 total with half to the school.

    So what's the goal?  Fewer families but a larger chunk of money from each one? Or maximizing participation?  And be clear about what's included - is this a mini-session where each family might be getting 15 minutes of the photographer's time?  Or is the photographer spending 45 minutes with each family and making only half to a third as much money per package?  Will there be post-processing or will photos be provided as straight out of the camera shots?

    (I'm not at all saying that $75 is not a good deal. But I'm saying that it is a lot of money for a family that typically spends $15 on pictures and for whom paying the school tuition is a stretch.  So just consider the market at this particular school.  It would not be very successful at my childrens' schools. But it would be a huge success at others.)

  • YEs I would depending on the cost.

  • I am the photographer. 

    Money is not an issue for the most part in the area (us excluded Smile )

    Joseys- I would never be able to just deliver 10- I would say it and then go over, like I always do!  There was already a flyer with info and images that went home with students.

    Happy_Momma- 30 min (approx, prob will go over!) sessions, post-processsing and also B&W conversion.

    C ~ Spring 2006 Baby! Photobucket
  • If you have been on this board for any length of time you would know that I am pretty much the most frugal person here. And $75 is a chunk of change out of the budget for us. I am well aware of how that amount can affect a family.

    That being said, I would much, much rather have a fundraiser that has something useful for my family (photos that we would do anyway) than have to hit up family, friends and coworkers for something like those vile Joe Corbi pizzas. We had a minimum amount that we were responsible for anyway, whether we sold the stupid pizza or not, and it was well over the $50 that the school would be getting from this fundraiser.

    AKA KnittyB*tch
    DS - December 2006
    DD - December 2008

    imageimage
  • Absolutely.
    Stay at Home Mama to 3 Beautiful Children by the miracles of Birth & Adoption
  • imageAnnapolisLari:

    That being said, I would much, much rather have a fundraiser that has something useful for my family (photos that we would do anyway) than have to hit up family, friends and coworkers for something like those vile Joe Corbi pizzas. We had a minimum amount that we were responsible for anyway, whether we sold the stupid pizza or not, and it was well over the $50 that the school would be getting from this fundraiser.

    Oh I agree that I'd much rather spend money on photos than random crap.  And selling random crap to other people - that's the worst!  That type of mandatory fundraiser would never fly at my kids' schools, though. So I'm coming at it from a different perspective.  If I was required to spend a certain amount on school fundraisers, then by all means, sign me up for this photo deal! 

    I do think $75 is a great deal for what is being offered, and it's a great idea for the right school.  

  • I'd totally do that.  Sounds like a great deal and think it's special to have the pictures on school grounds.

    image

    David "BD" 2/8/07 Spencer 9/12/11
  • Yes, I would do it. Sounds likes great deal.
    image
    Liam is 5!
    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers
  • Not for $75...I would if it was cheaper though...$25-30.
    Lilypie Second Birthday tickers Lilypie Fifth Birthday tickers
  • Is this a private school?  Then no, especially if it's the Montessori.  Seriously, our Montessori tuition is our biggest bill every month.  I expect them to use that money to provide my children with a safe environment, with no additional cost to me.

     Public school?  Totally. 

  • imageAggieCouple:

    Is this a private school?  Then no, especially if it's the Montessori.  Seriously, our Montessori tuition is our biggest bill every month.  I expect them to use that money to provide my children with a safe environment, with no additional cost to me.

     Public school?  Totally. 

    Yes.  It's not so much a 'the playground is old and unsafe' as 'the playground is old and could be more fun and a tree fell on the other small playground during the rainstorms so there is only the older one'.  But I totally understand the not liking a fundraiser for a private school standpoint.

    C ~ Spring 2006 Baby! Photobucket
  • For $75, heck yes. I just had to do the wrapping paper fundraiser ... hate that I paid $8 for a roll I could have purchased at Target for $2 and only a small precent of that $8 goes to my kid's school. I'd rather just give cash to the school!
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"