DC2 will be 20mos younger then DD. I am very excited but nervous too (it happened quickly for us, and in more of the "not trying to prevent" mode vs really actively trying for close spacing).
That said, I'm wondering why 2u2 ends up being a "big deal" (own message board, comments people make).
Do you really think that it is really easier if DCs are 2.5, 3 years (or even more) apart? Is it just that there are more logistical challenges like 2 in diapers, 2 still not fully verbal?
I am looking forward to the fact that I haven't been spoiled by finishing diapers only to start again, to know that the childproofing has been done (not undone, only to be done again as large age differences might be) and that I won't have several years of real sleep only to have night wakings again.
Re: Why is 2u2 unique/singled out?
I like to think people realize the wisdom of having 2u2 & single us out for our superior decision making.
That could be the sleep deprivation talking though.
Our family blog
I like this answer
I dont necessarily think it's easier if kids are further apart. Every mom I've known IRL had a difficult transition with the 3 year age gap. The older child got used to being an only, and acted out a lot when the new baby came. My SIL had a 5 year gap between kids, and felt like a FTM because she had totally forgotten the newborn stage.
I think a lot of how hard/easy any gap is dependent on the kids involved. I've had 2 easy kids so far *knock on wood* but if I didnt, I might feel differently about 2u2. I thought for me the benefits of having them close outweighed the downfalls. Others see it differently and that's fine. I get why someone wouldnt want to have 2 totally dependent children. I just felt long-term it was the best choice for our family both emotionally and financially.
My FIL repeatedly told us that he was going to have to buy us a TV after we told him the we were going to have another baby. I always laughed it off but it actually still upsets me to think about it.
OP I look at it the same way that you do. Better to have both/multiple going thru the baby stages all at once so that you do don't have to get reacquainted with the demands. Ours weren't planned to be this close but I am so happy that it worked out this way. I truly love it!!!
MyFitnessPal - Free Calorie Counter
"Karma1969: If baking someone a birthday pie/cake is romantic, I must be a slut."
I think the hardest thing for me was that I couldnt trust my older one to listen and stay near me in public at 18 months when I had a newborn to care for. He would run like crazy, so I needed to plan ahead when I needed to nurse in public, or just cross the street. I couldnt say to him (like I do now at almost 3) please stay near mommy, and he would listen---yeah right. I think every age gap has its pros/cons, but having two so close is difficult at times. I think the diaper thing is the EASIEST part. If I had to potty train my son now while having a newborn who needed to be nursed constantly i would pull my hair out. I love so many aspects of having my kids so close, but its tiring to say the least.
I do think its nice that my son wasnt the only child for long making him spoiled...my niece was like that and had a hard adjustment to her new sister.
This.
My kids at 3, 4, and 5 were much more likely to listen, mind and play independently than they were at 17 months.
I watched a friend's 9 month old last weekend and was stunned at how easy it was to handle the baby with the boys being older.
Total score: 6 pregnancies, 5 losses, 2 amazing blessings that I'm thankful for every single day.
Yep, this is what I struggle with too with my 20 month old. He's not a runner but he does wander. It makes things very difficult when we go out. That's definitely been my biggest challenge.
Our family blog
THIS!!!!! This has so been the hardest part for me! Other than that, I absolutely LOVE how close they are and it wasn't planned, and I was freaked out about it until DS2 was actually born. I can't imagine it any other way.
) I just wish DS1 would hang out and not run off when I asked him to! haha.