The Washington Post is running a contest to find its new career advice columnist. For the application you have to answer a couple of sample questions and submit an anecdote. You also have to submit a photo. Many people are upset about the photo requirement.
The final judging of the contest will be by the public.
If you were voting on an advice columnist, how much of your decision would be based on the way the candidates look?
Re: Would you take advice from an unattractive person?
I think you'd get more honest answers from a clicky poll!
That said, I don't tend to look at actual attractiveness of people (like features), but what sticks out to me is how the person carries themselves, dresses, grooming habits, etc.
That said, I'm known to go out in yoga pants or athletic shorts and a tank top and unwashed hair thrown into a pony tail, so take that FWIW.
For an advice column? IDK. I think I might start asking people to PIP on here before I accept their advice
Not consciously.
Lol GHM!
I think that people tend to listen to attractive people more and they just don't even realize it and I know how horrible that is. But I would rather know how what the person thinks makes them successful themselves instead of a picture.
I wouldn't take advice through a newspaper column period.
Advice from an unattractive person in general? Sure. Why not?
LOL! Good point!
Actually, I have trouble taking people who are extremely attractive/overdressed (i.e. too trendy) seriously. Like, anytime a supermodel opens her mouth about health or an actor about politics, I want to slap their mouth shut.
I think I both consciously and subconsciously take the advice of those who LOOK intelligent, not simply pretty/handsome, although neatness of appearance is a big draw.
This. Maybe they just want to weed out the Internet trolls.