Big surprise. He looks like Skeletor and I really hate her for her anti-IF views.
Twin boys born too early at 17w4d and 18w2d in February 2010
Transabdominal cerclage placed September 2010
DS born at 35w1d in February 2011
Twin girls born at exactly 36w in February 2013
Big surprise. He looks like Skeletor and I really hate her for her anti-IF views.
pretty much all this! And I refuse to sleep with a guy whose hipbones protrude farther than mine, period. Eat a dang cheeseburger! And don't get me started on JLO's "they were natural twins" crap.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Big surprise. He looks like Skeletor and I really hate her for her anti-IF views.
Wait. Seriously?
I figured her kids are the byproduct of IVF, or the very least stimming meds and TI (40 year old gives birth to twins after 4 years of marriage....ummm yeah).....odd.
ETA: OK I had to google this to see it for myself.
Accepting who she is ? and her limitations ? was key to Jennifer?s decision to forgo in-vitro fertilization.?When it comes to family and relationships, I?m quite traditional,? she explains. ?Just because of the way I was raised.?
Being married and divorced THREE times is still traditional I guess. Lovely.
From what I've read of it, I don't *think* she meant it to come out the way it did. And I'm no fan of hers by any means. I respect her right to not choose that for herself but at the same time I don't think she can really speak to what she would or wouldn't do in that situation when she hasn't been placed in that position (supposedly). Plus (and again I don't think she meant it this way) it came off as judgy.
I took this as one of those situations where it's not the message she was trying to convey (that she wouldn't want to do IVF herself) but the delivery (in saying that she doesn't do it because of her being "traditional", which really being traditional has nothing to do with choosing or not choosing IVF). Does that make sense?
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Re: J lo and marc anthony : splitting up!
Maybe marriage isn't her thing . . .
That's too bad. They got married the day my BFF had her baby and Ronald Reagan passed away. Strange the things I remember.
Yes, true...but still sad for their adorable twins.
Twin boys born too early at 17w4d and 18w2d in February 2010
Transabdominal cerclage placed September 2010
DS born at 35w1d in February 2011
Twin girls born at exactly 36w in February 2013
Wait. Seriously?
I figured her kids are the byproduct of IVF, or the very least stimming meds and TI (40 year old gives birth to twins after 4 years of marriage....ummm yeah).....odd.
ETA: OK I had to google this to see it for myself.
Accepting who she is ? and her limitations ? was key to Jennifer?s decision to forgo in-vitro fertilization.?When it comes to family and relationships, I?m quite traditional,? she explains. ?Just because of the way I was raised.?
Being married and divorced THREE times is still traditional I guess.
Lovely.
BFP #3 via cancelled IUI ~ C (2lb 3oz; HELLP) 5/16/11
BFP #4 via the natural (free!) way ~ E (8lb 11oz) 9/13/12
From what I've read of it, I don't *think* she meant it to come out the way it did. And I'm no fan of hers by any means. I respect her right to not choose that for herself but at the same time I don't think she can really speak to what she would or wouldn't do in that situation when she hasn't been placed in that position (supposedly). Plus (and again I don't think she meant it this way) it came off as judgy.
I took this as one of those situations where it's not the message she was trying to convey (that she wouldn't want to do IVF herself) but the delivery (in saying that she doesn't do it because of her being "traditional", which really being traditional has nothing to do with choosing or not choosing IVF). Does that make sense?