Ha! Thanks, Eaglefoot. That's just so strange to me. I have seen a lot of female names on the older [1800s-early 1900s] SSA lists but I thought that some of those were errors. I can't imagine meeting a boy named Elizabeth. Great name, though.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
It IS a great name. Probably my favorite girls name of all time.
I am also a bit perplexed on the male ties to the name. After a quick Google search, I found little-to-no information on the history of Elizabeth being used for boys.
I did find this Livejournal blog entry, which was pretty interesting:
We know that the name has been used for women since at least Biblical times. But I'm not sure if it started as a female, male, or unisex. If it did start out as just female, maybe the unique meaning ("my God is an oath" or "my God is abundance") compelled the parents of boys to use it. It's also a saint's name, so maybe that has something to do with it. (I'm not catholic, so I'm not exactly sure how that works.)
I do think it's weird that you brought this up now, because I just recently watched a television show, which talked about the conspiracy theory that Queen Elizabeth was a man.
8 sounds like an error in paperwork, but I agree that the numbers in the hundreds suggest something else at work. Is there an ethnicity that uses Elizabeth for boys in the same way that the French use Marie for boys?
It IS a great name. Probably my favorite girls name of all time.
I am also a bit perplexed on the male ties to the name. After a quick Google search, I found little-to-no information on the history of Elizabeth being used for boys.
I did find this Livejournal blog entry, which was pretty interesting:
We know that the name has been used for women since at least Biblical times. But I'm not sure if it started as a female, male, or unisex. If it did start out as just female, maybe the unique meaning ("my God is an oath" or "my God is abundance") compelled the parents of boys to use it. It's also a saint's name, so maybe that has something to do with it. (I'm not catholic, so I'm not exactly sure how that works.)
I do think it's weird that you brought this up now, because I just recently watched a television show, which talked about the conspiracy theory that Queen Elizabeth was a man.
As a Catholic the Saint name explanation makes SOME sense. "Mary" and variations of it are used for boys sometimes and priests take her name but... it's usually not their first name. For example, I know a priest named Joseph Mary. Elizabeth for a boy is highly unusual! I wonder if there was a nickname associated with it that sounded very masculine?
As a Catholic the Saint name explanation makes SOME sense. "Mary" and variations of it are used for boys sometimes and priests take her name but... it's usually not their first name. For example, I know a priest named Joseph Mary. Elizabeth for a boy is highly unusual! I wonder if there was a nickname associated with it that sounded very masculine?
Thank you for weighing in! I was hoping at least one catholic person would comment.
There is one masculine name, which is not directly related to the name, but is a distant cousin:
SHEBA
Gender:Masculine
Usage:Biblical
Other Scripts:?????? (Ancient Hebrew)
Pronounced:SHEE-b? (English)
Means "oath" in Hebrew. This was the name of several characters in the Old Testament. Also in the Bible this is a place name, referring to a region in Ethiopia. The queen of Sheba visited Solomon after hearing of his wisdom.
From what I gather from the BTN information on Elizabeth, perhaps it went something like this:
Sheba -> Elisheba -> Elisheva -> Elisabet -> Elizabeth
But that still doesn't explain why parents would still choose the female variant of the name for their son. I don't know any male Robertas or Thomasinas (although I must admit, I DID look them up before using them here as examples). Elizabeth itself has to have been a legitimate male name at some point.
Many of those "boy Elizabeths" as well as other obviously-gendered names appearing on the other list are most likely errors in recording the gender. If you look at the older lists (pre-1990s or so) many of them even made it into the top 1,000 (that was before computers were commonplace to catch the mistakes).
Then why does the boy popularity follow its own trend patterns, apart from the trend of the girl popularity? If more girls are named Elizabeth in any particular year, there should be more "errors" for that year, right?
And how do you account for the 8 born last year, when computers were there to "catch the mistakes"? (I'm not sure how they would do this anyway, since computers are only as smart as the humans who operate them.)
Re: Boys named Elizabeth
Their parents made the mistake of naming their daughter Elliott, and now they feel like they have to even it out with their son?
Just kidding. Actually the name has been used for boys more often than you might think. In 1989 there were 141 of them! Here's the SSA info:
a = Not in top 1,000 names for indicated year of birth
It IS a great name. Probably my favorite girls name of all time.
I am also a bit perplexed on the male ties to the name. After a quick Google search, I found little-to-no information on the history of Elizabeth being used for boys.
I did find this Livejournal blog entry, which was pretty interesting:
https://heartstart.livejournal.com/73507.html
We know that the name has been used for women since at least Biblical times. But I'm not sure if it started as a female, male, or unisex. If it did start out as just female, maybe the unique meaning ("my God is an oath" or "my God is abundance") compelled the parents of boys to use it. It's also a saint's name, so maybe that has something to do with it. (I'm not catholic, so I'm not exactly sure how that works.)
I do think it's weird that you brought this up now, because I just recently watched a television show, which talked about the conspiracy theory that Queen Elizabeth was a man.
Baby Name Popularity by State
Burned by the Bear
As a Catholic the Saint name explanation makes SOME sense. "Mary" and variations of it are used for boys sometimes and priests take her name but... it's usually not their first name. For example, I know a priest named Joseph Mary. Elizabeth for a boy is highly unusual! I wonder if there was a nickname associated with it that sounded very masculine?
There is one masculine name, which is not directly related to the name, but is a distant cousin:
Gender: Masculine
Usage: Biblical
Other Scripts: ?????? (Ancient Hebrew)
Pronounced: SHEE-b? (English)
From what I gather from the BTN information on Elizabeth, perhaps it went something like this:
Sheba -> Elisheba -> Elisheva -> Elisabet -> Elizabeth
But that still doesn't explain why parents would still choose the female variant of the name for their son. I don't know any male Robertas or Thomasinas (although I must admit, I DID look them up before using them here as examples). Elizabeth itself has to have been a legitimate male name at some point.
FET #1 Dec 2013 BFN
FET # 2 Feb 2014 BFN
No more frosties
IVF #2. September 2014
PGD yielded 2 perfect 5d blasts
SET November 9, 2014
Nov 23, 2014. Another BFN
Not sure where to go from here.
We talk about that subject all the time here, so I think we are allowed one thread on the subject of girl names on boys... if that's okay with you.
Then why does the boy popularity follow its own trend patterns, apart from the trend of the girl popularity? If more girls are named Elizabeth in any particular year, there should be more "errors" for that year, right?
And how do you account for the 8 born last year, when computers were there to "catch the mistakes"? (I'm not sure how they would do this anyway, since computers are only as smart as the humans who operate them.)