We are going on vacation summer, flying into Boston then driving to RI for a week and ending the trip at a friends in Boston. We are renting a car for the week. Our options are:
A. Rent a car at a rental place at the airport - we would get a Ford Fusion or a car that size.
B. Rent a car from a place off-site which saves us about $200 but will add an hour or 2 onto our trip as we would need to take a shuttle or taxi from the airport to Allston which is where the car rental place is. With this place, we could rent a Prius which could save us even more money on gas.
I should add that the place we are staying is about a 2 hour drive from the airport - not counting the horrible Friday night traffic we will hit. Our flight lands at 5pm.
I am very torn as $200 is a decent amount of money but the thought of all that extra time after traveling all day is making me second guess the decision. If it was just DH and I, I wouldn't even think twice about it but the girls are 3 and 5 and while they travel great, that could be a really, really long night even if we do dinner before we start driving, put them into PJ's and hope they fall asleep in the car. DH really wants to do plan B.
Re: Which would you do? Rental car
We did the offsite car rental last year on a trip (with the kids) and the $135 we saved was not worth the hassle.
So, I'm with R if the money is not a deal breaker, go with the airport rental.
Allston isn't that bad in terms of distance, but it will be a PITA to take a taxi on Friday afternoon to get there. I say rent at the airport. Allston isn't worth seeing, LOL.
Oh lord, don't take the T! The B line with little kids, luggae, and car seats?? I have the heebie jeebies just thinking of it.
Are you going to Newport? It won't be pretty, but may not be that bad...landing at 5 you won't be on the road until 6:30 probably...you could always spend the 1st night in Boston and then head our on Saturday to RI