DH cousin has one for her LO and at 5 months he is scooting around. I thought they weren't recommended because they do something with muscle development causing actual walking to maybe be an issue. Wdyt?
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Re: What do you think about walkers?
Not allowed here in Canada so they are not sold. I have friends in the U.S. that seem to like them though!
I think they would only be dangerous if you are near stairs or they are unsupervised. Its all in common sense.
Why are they bad developmentally? I knew of the danger near stairs, but I hadn't heard anything else.
We registered for one (I was looking at exersaucer things, and DH saw a pink Cadillac walker that he said we needed
), but we don't have any stairs in our condo.
Happy Spring!.
Statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics:
https://www.healthychildren.org/english/safety-prevention/at-home/Pages/Baby-Walkers-A-Dangerous-Choice.aspx?nfstatus=401&nftoken=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000&nfstatusdescription=ERROR:+No+local+token
https://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;108/3/790
A simple google search will show you that walkers are 1) dangerous 2) interfere with development - no your child will not learn to walk faster using it 3) unnecessary from reputable sources.
The first link just says that they are bad for development, but doesn't say how. The rest of it is about safety concerns that, IMO, depend more on how a person's house is set up.
The second link says:
One study that evaluated children between6 and 15 months of age demonstrated that walker-experienced infantssat, crawled, and walked later than no-walker controls, and theyscored lower on Bayley scales of mental and motor development.16At first, the unassisted gait of infants who use walkers may beslightly abnormal.2There is no evidence, however, thatsuch effects are lasting in typical children or that they haveany impact on the child's ultimate motor development or intelligence.
I'm not convinced it's the emergency situation for everyone. The way our condo is, I'd be more concerned about the safety of the walls in our hallway.
ETA - That came out snarkier than I meant. I was going to try to talk DH out of the walker anyway, mostly because it doesn't have many activity toys attached. I also don't want her chasing the dog.
I just think that as long as the child is supervised and in a safe area, it's not going to be as dangerous.
Happy Spring!.
We borrowed one from a friend, but honestly, it was pointless. He did way more 'walking' in the doorway jumper. And any walking was done with a push toy - walkers won't work on carpet either.
Like the exersaucer, jumperoo, doorway jumper... they are all crotch hangers. If left in them for long periods of time, it can be detrimental to their hips. That's why Bjorns and such are frowned upon as well, since they typically stay in them longer than 20 minutes at a time.
We probably won't get one because our place is small and has carpet throughout. If we get one as a gift, it will probably be stored at my parents house where there is room for him to move around in.
I think with exersaucers, jumperoos, etc., there is an issue with the way babies sit (crotch dangling), but if they aren't in it constantly, I see no problem with them. I would be vigilant of stairs and such. My brother went down the stairs in his and thankfully was OK, but I still don't see them as being horrible.
We used one with DD and had no safety issues because we keep an eye on our child. Also, we made sure she only used it downstairs. Lastly, she did not have any developmental issues, and she started walking the day she turned 9 months.
I know this is an UO, but I think some of these studies are getting ridiculous. I can't put my baby on a coat when it's -10 degrees outside, I can't put a blanket on him when he's asleep, I can't let him sleep in a carseat, I can't put him in a walker, etc.... WTH can you do with your baby now-a-days besides keep them in a bubble? OK, vent over!!