So...DH and I are talking about TTC again toward the middle - end of this year (due to a lot of factors, including my age and the fact that pregnancy was not the easiest for me), which means we could potentially have 2 under 2. How did you survive? Was it complete madness for a while? Do you like the fact that your kiddos are so close in age? Any other pros/cons that you want to mention are appreciated. I guess I just need some reassurance that it is doable and that we can get through it with a decent amount of our sanity intact. V has not been an easy child so I guess I'll be praying like mad that the next one is a little easier/laid back.
No siggy pic until TB gets rid of Twitter and FB links


Re: If you have/had 2 u 2, come in please
I did 2u2 (though it was closer to 2u1, lol!). I will say that it's a lot easier now that they are older, but it was really tough at first. It was probably different for me just because Leo was so young - only 13 months - when Charlie was born, but I will never purposely do that to myself again. It was like having two babies at the same time, because really a 1 year old still is a baby, in need of constant attention and supervision. Now that Leo is 2.5 I think of how much easier it would have been to have another newborn with him at this age rather than over a year earlier.
Now, all negatively aside (sorry!), there are positives, especially now. I think the main plus has been that they really are starting to be very close and play together. It's really sweet to watch them like that, and I think that they will appreciate being close in age as they get older. We can do a lot of stuff all together, without having to worry about entertaining a much older child and a young baby at the same time. It's a lot of fun...now.
I won't say "don't do it!" because I think that is a decision for every family to make on their own, AND, I really do think it'd be very different with an 18 month old vs a 13 month old, but I will say to expect things to be tough at first. If you can push through the first year or so though, it's not so bad after
How did you survive?
Honestly going back to work probably helped me a lot the second time around! Although I'm sure if I was a SAHM then playdates and friends would have been my sanity :-)
Was it complete madness for a while?
Yeah it was. Megan had a tough time adjusting to Ryan, she didn't want to share me. Then Ryan got colic so our only peaceful time, i.e. evenings was not so peaceful. I remember just crying on the couch because I just want to nurse and snuggle Ryan and he just cried non-stop. Then the colic went away around when I went back to work. Ryan wouldn't take a bottle, so I came home from work and had Ryan on the boob from like 6pm til 10pm! Then Megan broke her leg :-( So really it wasn't just 2u2 that made it crazy some of it was just our year!
Do you like the fact that your kiddos are so close in age?
Yes, yes love it! I love how they play together. They can play with a lot of the same toys too and like to go to the same places.
Any other pros/cons that you want to mention are appreciated.
I think I underestimated how tough it was going to be at first. Thinking back I just didn't realize how little time I would get to myself and how that effected my sanity! :-) I wish I had done a better job to carve out some real me time and make that a priority, there was just so much going on I just kept putting it off.
I guess I just need some reassurance that it is doable and that we can get through it with a decent amount of our sanity intact.
Yes definitely possible! :-)
Our Blog
thanks for asking this!! i'm gonna bookmark and read when i have more time. we will have 2 under 2 in august and taylor was not an easy baby at all. she is still challenging, but i've relaxed a bit.
i keep thinking the next should be easy cuz the first wasn't. right? RIGHT??
That actually worked out pretty well for me! Leo was the most difficult newborn ever and Charlie was pretty easy.
However, not sure if you're experiencing this, but my difficult newborn turned into a pretty calm and easy going toddler, while my easy baby goes through life of some kind of baby version of crack. So there's that
Yes! Payback for having to live through the difficult one!
Thankfully, my H is very hands on, too. I don't know how I would have made it through the first 4 months with V had he not been. But this is good input!
I'm gonna pretend like every response in this thread said it was pure awesomesauce and a piece of freaking cake.
:::looks at ticker and starts to feel faint:::
Me too. Everything will be sunshine, rainbows, and cupcakes.
Mine are 18 months apart. DD (#1) was an easy baby, which to me means she was a good sleeper
DS (#2) didn't sleep more than 3-4 hours in a row for a year...
I work FT and DH stays home, so that helped quite a bit. We were able to work together and he is obviously very involved.
How did you survive?
The hardest part was that #2 didn't sleep. The other stuff really wasn't too bad. DD was a great age- very flexible and helpful. She would "help" get bottles, burp rags, etc. She wasn't super fussy, so there weren't many times she was crying or upset and we couldn't get to her. DS wanted to be held and walked all.the.time, but it really helped when I could sit and nurse him and DD would sit next to me or on a chair and we would read or sing songs.
Was it complete madness for a while?
Yes, but not until #2 was mobile. They are now 2 and 3 1/2 and while it probably looks like madness, but it's really just busy and fun.
Do you like the fact that your kiddos are so close in age?
LOVE it. There are certainly some down sides, but it's perfect for us.
Any other pros/cons that you want to mention are appreciated.
Pros- I think #1 was at an easy age (for her) and was still really flexible. It would have been harder to do it later, I think. Two in diapers is a lot, but we didn't mind. We often changed them both even if just one needed it, so we didn't feel like we were changing diapers all day. Now, the end of (daytime) diapers is in sight and it's awesome! They play with the same things now and it's not only convenient, it's awesome to see. They enjoy painting together, throwing a ball, etc. I also like that #1 isn't quite into toys with small parts yet, since DS is getting old enough to understand he can't put things in his mouth.
Cons- It's loud. It doesn't bother us, but I know we overwhelm people sometimes
DD wanted to walk all the time when DS was born, which was easier since I didn't have her, but was hard to get around with them both. As they got older, we had a hard time keeping them both in a stroller. Even now, when one wants to be walking (which really means running), the other one does, too. We used to have an easy time finding people to watch just one child and even when DS was a baby, people (like our parents) were more willing to do it. But now, it can seem like crazy town for people who aren't used to it and we are more likely to have to pay a sitter than have free help!
I guess I just need some reassurance that it is doable and that we can get through it with a decent amount of our sanity intact.
Absolutely. Patience is important, but it's doable for sure. The most beneficial thing for us was getting them on the same nap schedule. For the last year, they have both been napping 2-3 hours at the same time. It's a great break, if you need it.
I absolutely love it. We survived the first 6 months (the hardest part, imo) in Austin with no family around to help, and it wasn't all that bad. Stressful at times, sure, but any time you have a 2nd (3rd, 4th, etc.) kid it's going to be nutso while everyone adjusts.
Now, with #2 over a year? Pretty easy. They entertain each other for short periods of time, their needs are pretty much the same as far as what they eat and drink and when they sleep, etc. I love it and am SO happy we had them close.
(read it. you know you want to.)
anderson . september 2008
vivian . february 2010
mabel . august 2012
(read it. you know you want to.)
anderson . september 2008
vivian . february 2010
mabel . august 2012
How did you survive?
It was definitely tough. Even though K2 was a great sleeper overall (not sttn at 3 months or anything, but better than K1) K1 started waking up at night and it felt like they would tag team and so we didn't end up sleeping well for almost a year after K2 was born. DH was a HUGE help. It was hard, but we tried to talk about how hard it was and knew that it was only for a short time, which helped keep things in perspective.
Was it complete madness for a while?
Yes. Even with a great partner helping out with everything, I felt torn in two. I wanted to continue the close bond with #1, but I had a baby with more essential needs (nursing every 2 hours). I love(d) my baby so much but I missed my big boy and wanted to spend time with him too. DH had to take care of a lot of K1's needs so they developed a great bond (which I missed). But things are so much easier and better now.
Do you like the fact that your kiddos are so close in age?
Absolutely. I love it! I love how they interact and play together. It is so fun to observe, makes my heart melt.
Any other pros/cons that you want to mention are appreciated.
I think having them close together is very stressful on a marriage initially because with only one, at least one person can get a break some of the time. With 2, it's man-on-man coverage so there's never really a break until they're both sleeping. I really think talking about it helps a lot and knowing that it's only temporary and just a drop in a bucket of time that it's going to be like this.
I guess I just need some reassurance that it is doable and that we can get through it with a decent amount of our sanity intact.
Yes, it is completely doable and you will get your sanity back. And then you'll want a third, like me. Ha, just kidding!