about inductions and c-sections. I'm in no way singling out anyone but I'm just surprised that with the c-section rate so high, doctors are suggesting to people before 40 weeks that their progress isn't good enough. The suggestion seems to be without the correct amount of progress at their due date, an induction might not even work and a c-section would be the best way to go in the long run.
Am I silly that hearing this kind of thing frustrates me? Just knowing what I know NOW after what I consider a lot of research on VBACs, it just seems completely backwards. Why aren't doctors saying things like, you aren't dilated but at 39 weeks that doesn't mean a thing. The average is something like 41 weeks a first time mom gives birth....and let's not forget that 42nd week! Why get a pregnant mom all concerned?
Re: I'm surprised about some posts I'm seeing on other boards...
I completely agree.
I will never understand the obsession with due dates.
you know, i've always had a random thought about this too about how maybe docs are messing with human evolution by pushing the inductions so early.
maybe there's a reason why the average pregnancy last 41 weeks that no one knows yet. maybe the baby NEEDS to be in there as long as they're in there.
docs may know how big a baby is, but they truly have no idea how the mother can tolerate it...
I've got a story to top you all! A friend of mine isn't even far enough along yet to know what she is having and her MW told her that she probably couldn't go naturally like she wants because she is so small. And that she might need a c/s. What the heck? Really are you freaking serious?
I know that we got our "little tax write-off" because of a screwed up induction turned c/s, but I now don't understand why I wasn't just on hospital bed rest for toxemia. It wasn't that bad. They could have let me go a few more weeks. I was not even a fingertip dialated and they did the ripener and pitocin. FAIL before it even started!