I haven't been charting for the past two cycles b/c we're supposed to be taking a break from TTC until I loose some more weight. BUT DH and I have been at it like high schoolers this week (sorry if TMI) and knowing that I historically O 9 days after the end of AF, I figured I would PIAC and take an OPK test for sh!ts and giggles and see based on when we've been having sex, what our chances are of getting KU this cycle.
So I entered my + OPK for yesterday, and FF put my O date as today. But based on my history I usually DO O on the day I get a + OPK. So I changed O date to today.
What's interesting to me, is we had sex on Tues and today, but not yesterday. When FF thought today was my O date, it said our chances of getting KU were good. When I changed my O date to yesterday, it now says our chances of getting KU are high.
I find it interesting that having sex the day before and the day after O, according to FF, gives you better chance of getting KU than having sex ON O day.
Just thought I would throw that out there :-P
Re: Interesting... re:FF
You're probably right, I am tampering with my chart, but I wasn't even really charting this cycle... as I said, we were supposed to be taking a break from TTC for now. It was more of a "let's just see" thing. The point of my story was more that I found it interesting that FF would give you a higher chance of conceiving when you have sex the day before and after O, rather than the day OF O. I am sure it would have kept the rating the same whether FF said I O'd yesterday or I changed it myself.
Together since 5/08 ~ Married 6/19/10 ~ TTC #1 since 8/10
BFP#1 3/26/11 ~ EDD 12/2/11 ~ Ectopic Twins left tube 7w3d
BFP#2 11/2/11 ~ EDD 7/14/12 ~ Robert Edgar born 7/18/12
BFP#3 9/28/13 ~ EDD 5/20/14 ~ Benjamin Clarence born 5/15/14
That is true.
but having good is also not that bad. My first pregnancy, it was GOOD and we conceived.