Hi, just starting to put together a registry, and I can't decide on what bassinet-type item we'll get. Most people I know have just gotten a pack n play and used the bassinet feature of that. We don't have room to put that next to our bed, which I would like to do. (We have 24" of clearance on each side). So I'm looking at smaller items.
The Arms Reach Mini Co-sleeper looks good, and is meant to have one side almost even with our mattress so I could just pull baby over for breastfeeding. It's $139.
Another option is a travel crib, like this Graco one. It is cheaper, only $80, but I would probably have to pull the baby up a bit for breastfeeding. I'm not sure if that slight hassle is worth paying an additional $60 to avoid.
Has anyone looked at either of these? This is not exactly a pressing issue at the moment, but just something I was looking at.
Re: Thoughts on Arms Reach Co-sleeper vs. travel crib?
I think so. It connects to your bed, but it's supposed to be easy to disconnect, and it folds up. It converts to a regular bassinet (the fourth side comes up) and to a playard, though I'm sure the playard is quite small compared to others.
Have you seen the Fisher Price Rock N Play? Something I am considering for sleeping in our room (we'll have two of them for the twins). I have read some really good reviews online about them and they fold up quickly and easily to move into another room or take with you. It also has the option to incline a bit if your baby has any reflux issues and needs to sleep on an angle.
Just a thought and for $50, not a bad option!
I also have this. The incline is not an option, it is actually fixed at an incline, it doesn't lay flat (I bought mine last Summer, IDK if they updated it and made it adjustable since)
IMO, the thing is fantastic!. As you said, it is super portable and lightweight. However, it wouldn't replace a bassinet or co-sleeper because
1) it doesn't lay flat. The AAP recommends that infants spend most of their sleep time on a flat position to minimize the risk of SIDS.
2)It is waaay lower than most beds, so it is not as easily accessible during middle of the nigh wakings.
3) The back of the RnP is reinforced with a thick piece of hard plastic. So it is actually very, very hard for long sleep periods on a newborn's soft head.