As much as I want to see LO again (& I really, really do!), I haven't scheduled a NT scan. I'm pretty prone to stressing & overanalyzing, & I'm worried that if they found "soft signs" of issues, it'd just give me more to stress about & that wouldn't be good for the baby. Unless this LO has a lethal problem we wouldn't consider termination, so I don't know if it'd be worth it to pursue this testing. (Actually, at this point, it may even be too late to schedule an appointment.)
FWIW, my next regular appointment is on 1/10. My OB offered the NT scan + bloodwork as an optional screen, as is the 16 week genetic screen (bloodwork only).
Just curious if anyone else decided to forgo the tests or had any other insights. Thank you, & I hope you're all doing well!
Re: Anyone NOT doing the NT scan + bloodwork?
bfp 01/23/10 m/c 12w1d 03/14/10 EDD 09/24/10
bfp 07/20/10 m/c 5w1d 07/25/10
bfp 11/19/10 Born 07/24/11 via C/S
My Forever Sister From Another Mister~CashewsMommy!!
We didn't have it done. I have to pay everything out of pocket and we couldn't justify the extra expense or the. I stress A LOT before every u/s. If it is covered by your insurance it might give you some peace of mind.
You should be careful saying "Unless this LO has a lethal problem we wouldn't consider termination" you don't know what you would do and there are woman on this board that have had to make this VERY difficult decision and that can come across the wrong way. I know the last thing any of us would want to do is hurt another woman who has suffered a loss with our words.
GL with your decision and I hope your LO is healthy and you have an uneventful 9 months.
BFP on Cycle 14--TWINS! Identical twin boys stillborn at 19wks(1/9/10)
3 break cycles; took clomid 50mg, BFP #2 Beta #1 35, Beta #2 338!!! Owen was born 2/11/11!
TTC#2: 4 cycles on clomid: BFNs
BFP #3: Cycle #5 100mg clomid; beta #1 21; beta #2 6=CP
Cycle #6 break cycle TTC no meds=BFN
Cycle #7: 150 clomid+ovidril+IUI=BFN (switched to RE)
Cycle #8: follistem+ovidril+TI=BFN
Cycle #9 Forced break due to cyst
Cycle #10 follistem+ovidril+TI=BFN
Cycle #11 follistem+ovidril+TI=BFN
Cycle#12 Forced break due to cyst, went on BCP; did repeat HSG, Saline U/S
Cycle #13 IVF: Follistim/Menapur ER 11-30 11 eggs, 5 mature, 4 fertilized and 3dt on 12-3; BFN
Cycle #14: IVF#2 lupron/follistim/menopur ER 1-22, 19 eggs, 14 fertilized, 5dt on 1-27, BFP!! beta 1: 63, beta 2: 119; EDD 10-15-13; 1 frozen embie
There are several lethal problems that could be found in an NT scan, so if you would consider terminating in that case, then that's all the more reason to get the scan. As for stressing about "soft markers," there are no "soft markers" in an NT scan. You would simply get a probability as to the likelihood of neural tube defects and Down Syndrome. That would enable you to get a more definitive test like an amnio or CVS earlier. Basically, you'll end up the same place you'll end up after the anatomy scan, but with more information and at an earlier point in the pregnancy, so that you have more options available to you.
I think you should at least call to see whether there's still time to schedule it, then make the decision from there.
Even if I "wouldn't" terminate, I would want to know what I'm dealing with.
I don't want to be blindsided in the delivery room. If my baby has any issues, I'd like as much time as possible to wrap my head around it, do some research, and be ready to welcome that child into my life. I want his/her birth to be joyous and welcoming, not sad because I didn't know s/he had downs or something else.
MC 9/8/10
Baby Boy Born 7/31/11
You're absolutely right, & I'm sorry if I offended anyone. I was trying to sum up our (current) feelings in a short statement which, of course, is impossible. I suppose it would've been better to say that we want to do what is most compassionate for our baby. As a vet, I have had to deal with these sorts of decisions quite a bit (especially this past year when we had to decide it was time to say goodbye to one of our own furbabies--one of the hardest things I've ever had to do). And it's ALWAYS difficult. I know it's not exactly the same thing, but my philosophy is try to be as unselfish as possible & do what is most compassionate. Which is different for every individual faced with a difficult choice. (I would never judge someone else for the decisions they had to make under such heartbreaking conditions.)
Having said that, I'm still waiting to get my insurance information (my new coverage starts tomorrow), so I don't know if we're going to have to pay OOP, which would also factor into the decision. (I've tried requesting information from them numerous times...I can try again!)
Thank you for all of your input. I was hoping to get lots of different perspectives/experiences & I have. Looks like I'm going to have to do some more research...
Thank you again for your input!
It's possible that they may not do it. I know my new OB said that they bring in a specialist to do the scans. I don't know if that's a typical protocol or not, but it might explain why they don't do them routinely at your practice? If you know you want it, I'd definitely ask if they can refer you someplace to get it done. GL!
This plus what ashleyrsotomayor said are why I've been reluctant to do the scan.
Part of me still blames my stress level for what happened with our previous pregnancy & with our IF issues in between that one & our current LO. Whether this has real scientific grounding or not, I don't know. But I've been trying to stay as chill as possible this time around (at least as much as being PgAL will allow!).
I really appreciate everyone's opinions & suggestions. You ladies are the best! And thank you again.
Thanks, that's a good idea. I'll have to call on Mon.