Apparently, I am foolish and ignorant. DD has NOTHING to do with their ability to parent. I guess they just break out the 'ol copy of To Train Up A Child to justify beating the shiit out of their kids? How do they really separate the two forms of demanding obedience from both their wives and children? It never spills over to the kids? And, it IS about sex. Have you seen the avatars for some of the supporting comments? Many of the blogs have "adult content" warnings before you enter them. It takes all kinds, I guess?
Re: Responded to Brinlee's blog
It's NMS but it's just kink. No different than other kink people get into behind closed doors. I wouldn't assume that it would affect her parenting TBH.
Of course I also don't believe a word of it. I mean I'm sure they're into it but she sure as hell doesn't look like that!
I really don't get why they pretend it's not sexual at all. Or at least the people in the first link - I haven't dug too deeply in the other blogs.
It's just odd to me that they're pretending it's something other than what it very obviously is.
And LOL @ zenya - I'd love to see the real pictures, haha. I wonder if they stole these from myspace or facebook. They look like prom pictures for the most part.
I think the Parker/Brinlee blog is particularly odd because he's the one who suggested it as a way to keep their marriage happy after talking to a friend, and she apparently wasn't sure at first.
I don't know about the other blogs - the few I've looked at seem to be more consensual and seem to at least partially recognize that it is venturing into the BDSM territory. Those I would say it would be highly unlikely it would spill over into any child's life.
It's the ones who deny it has anything to do with sex and seem to give off an odd vibe where I can see what you're saying, Purrf. I mean, I think they are just fooling themselves, or it's part of their particular brand of kink, but I do see what you're saying.
wait- why does everyone think the pictures are fake?
Im confused.
Is it just because they don't fit a stereotype or is there more!
tell me tell me tell me!!!
I'm not convinced they're fake, but there's something off about the way they look in the pictures. Like that date night pic in the first blog - it looks like they are off to the school dance and Mom & Dad took their picture.
I think the husband is doing it for sexual pleasure certainly, but he uses religious manipulation to get his wife to submit or follow along. I mean the husband can't just say he wants to do S & M because that goes against the concept of cherishing and loving your wife like Christ loved the church. However, if the husband can somehow twist it so that he isn't doing it for sexual pleasure but more teaching her to submit to his authority, well then she might go along with that.
I don't think the wives are getting any sexual pleasure from it at all, well at least that is my opinion. Who knows, maybe they are.
I was thinking that too. Who took their picture? I know there are timers and tripods, etc .... But it is almost too "perfect" for a random date night and they set the timer on the camera to snap their picture.
Mommy to Rachel 1.15.06 and Ashley 5.17.11
Thank-you for saying what I was trying to! It's just such an odd way to behave unless it really is about sex. The women seem brainwashed.
I just don't think a lot of Christian women would go along with S & M because of the negative connotations attached to it. However if they are brainwashed enough into going along with it because they are submitting or being disciplned than maybe.
This is one of the problems I have with the church. Young women are told to wait till marriage to have sex because they will be cherished, loved and pretty much worshipped if they retain their virginity for their husband. Young men however are told once they are married they can do anything and that their wives will fulfill their every fantasy. Between the two there is sometimes a disconnect. Trust me. My husband and I waited till we were married and there was some incompatibility at first. I think we both just had unrealistic expectations of what sex was going to be like. So if a wife feels like she will be put on a pedastal during sex and be treated like a goddess, and if the husband thinks that his wife will fulfill his every sexual fantasy. Well sometimes you get this crap as a side effect. He can't just come out with his sexual desires and she just can't accept that sometimes their husbands just want dirty sex. The wives also can't just say " Nope not my thing, sorry." Does any of that make sense ?
So if the wife says that she isn't doing it for sexual reasons, she is probably telling you the truth. I don't think she is. She probably honestly thinks that she was disobedient and deserves to be punished. The husbands however, yeah totally doing it for the jollies. I mean the reasons the wives are getting punished. It is like they are looking for reasons to punish them. Also if the wives tell their husbands they want a spanking or whatever I think they are doing it because the punishment might be less if they fessed up to it instead of waiting for their husbands to find out.
That does make sense - my initial thought went immediately to religious, and unwilling to admit they were into something like BDSM which they would consider "dirty."
The women are also very obviously young if the pictures are accurate.
Haha, no I am not. This does not sound consensual to me so I consider it to be abuse. TRust me I would not put up with this crap. I have a feeling these women had no idea what they were signing up for when they married these men. Plus if these women live in a somewhat sheltered world they might not know about S&M. So all of this might be very confusing for them.
Well I grew up in Christianland so I understand it somewhat. Like I said I sincerely think that the husbands are getting a sexual rise from it but the wives are not. However they are too afraid to say something because they sincerely believe that they deserve to be punished. Or they don't want to admit that their husbands might be "perverts" so they blame themselves. Plus the added guilt that a divorce would send you to hell, yeah these women might just trick themselves into believe that this is right or to believe the best about their husbands.
I also want to say that I don't think that couples who are into this are necessarily perverts. To each their own. But if you for years were told that your virginity was the greatest gift that you can give your husband and that making love to you would almost be a spiritual experience. Well yeah than marrying someone who got off on beating you would be scary and confusing.
It just reminds me of the couple who used to go to our church. It came out that he had cheated on her several times and she blamed herself and not him. I know his former mistress and the things he said about his wife were just awful. However he never left her and she never left him.
I worked with his wife one time and she really thought that the affair was partly her fault and wanted to believe the best about her husband. Yes even when he was telling the former mistress that he was going to leave his wife for her. Just watching that whole trainwreck, it showed me how desperate some women are for a man in their life and how some women are just all to willing to bury their heads in the sand. Instead of just admitting that her husband was a douchebag, she kept believing that if she had enough faith then God would turn her husband into the man she wanted him to be.
I'm sure there are some women who do it just to go along with what their husbands want, but there are also a lot of women who really do get off on this kind of thing. I stumbled across this stuff online a few years ago, and I was fascinated by it. It really is just BDSM with a religious cover, and the reason there is a whole subculture of people who are into BDSM is because there are people who really enjoy being dominated like that-- both men and women. Some people extend their sub/dom behavior beyond the bedroom, I guess because it adds another level of sexual pleasure for them. I also stumbled across several forums where women were posting stuff about how they wanted their husbands to be more dominant, but the husband just wasn't into that sort of thing. It made for some very eye-opening reading, that's for sure. The most honest perspectives I found when I read about this were the ones who just admitted to getting sexual pleasure out of it and didn't tie it to any religious mandate. Anyway, I wouldn't be so quick to assume the women don't get anything out of it.
Yes, Jon and I are.
That is some weird sh!t...I'm inclined to think that Brinlee and Kenzie are fake though.
Also, for a look at this lifestyle without bringing Jesus into it, check out www.takeninhand.com.
Back to Purff's original point, though, I do wonder how this affects these people's kids. I mean, a sexual fetish is one thing when it's relegated to the bedroom, but when it extends to your whole relationship, it's totally different.
And I've always wondered what their families and friends have to say about this. If this is how you live (and especially if you don't admit to it being a sexual thing), it would be impossible to hide, and I can't imagine trying to explain that to anyone.
I tried to FB stalk them, but both their profiles are extremely private. Boooooo. I am so curious about these tapes. It makes sense, that it's a scam for money. Creechy, is all I have left to say.
This is a c&P from another board that talked about them too. I think the poster borught up some really good points.
amanjay:
There's no way this is real. 1., They describe the spanking in an S&M way. Seriously. It's like "he gently pulled down my panties, then warmed me up with his hand before moving on to the hairbrush and switch."
2. They clearly aren't learning from their "mistakes" although they are bright women (the one is a law student.)
3. They describe engaging in really childish behaviors with their husbands. Who "pouts, stamps her feet, and whines" when she wants something? Either they do it to get spanked, the spanking leads to childish behavior, or the whole thing is made up to try to make money from blogging.
4. These couples are unnaturally attractive. I know that some couples do use DD, but most of the ones I've seen (and I've seen quite a few since we investigated this phenom. in class one day) are overweight, middle aged, long-skirted fundie types.
iteresting. this is a pretty dead thread, but from what I remember the issue everyone was so fired up regarding this subject was that they were denying any sxualor "game-like aspect to this dynamic.
I don't have any problem with it or feel that they should be ugly to have proclivities such as these- I just refuse to believe that it is in no way sexually charged.
the end.
Well, I think saying that it's just a party to 'beat' women is a little off based. I mean, more often than not the women are spanking the men!! Just depends on what the individual likes.
BUT, there's a saying that I think is pretty accurate. Usually we say that the guy/girl who's the one leading the dynamic is the 'Top' and the individual who is being submissive is the 'Bottom'. With that, we say 'if the Top is in charge, the Bottom is in control'. Meaning, it's always at the discretion of the individual being acted upon and when it's not something they want, their desire to stop is always respected.
JGR
Oh, i know. I meant that more of a rhetorical question. Actually, beating woman would be a stupid, stupid party. Lame, dumb, illegal. "Beating (spanking) women (or men)" for sexual satisfaction might be a little more fun...its all a game. Alot of kink.