My little nephew was circumsized the other day (2 wk old) and his uncle thought it was necessary to post it as his FB status (i think that's a little odd, but w/e)... anyway it started a huge pro/con circ debate in his status thread... and several ppl commented that if you don't circ, he would have to do it as an adult if he wanted to join the military.
Now i know there is NO way this is possibly true, but i can find anything "official" online to share with the posters to prove it.
anyone care to help me educate these folks?
Re: never heard this before ... re circ..
LOL. So not true.
I don't think they'd officially spell out something so silly: "It is not required that you be circumcised before entering basic training."
It used to be true. Like for WWI. It was thought to cut down on VD.
https://www.historyofcircumcision.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=category§ionid=8&id=73
The miliary does not require circumcision. Not in the US anyway.
They encouraged it (although they did not expressly require it) during WWII under mistaken belief that it would prevent infection, but discontinued that when they found that the operation caused more complications than leaving foreskins alone.
That's a total myth- a common- but a false one. The only thing they make you cut is your hair!
To add to the confusion- there are a lot of lies and misinterpretations of things that happened in the past... for example- in WWII a Dr. may have treated a STD infection with a side order of circumcision... when the soldier gets home- Do you think he's going to tell his sweetheart that they cut him because he got the clap from a French hooker?... or maybe say something about how it was required? That's how myths like that get started (and by the way- you can't cure a STD with circumcision)- but that didn't stop them from doing it.
I read your post to DH and he started laughing. He's in the military. He is not circumcised. As the pp put it, the only thing the military cuts is your hair
ETA: YAY!!!!!! I can post again