In the Alexandria-Elizabeth post below people were lamenting the fact that the mom was insisting that her child be called by her full name.
So what? It's her name. Why on earth would it be wrong to have her go by her full name. My brothers are Michael and Matthew and went by Michael and Matthew until they were in junior high and decided to go by Mike and Matt. Was my mom pretentious for using full names? It seems silly.
Re: Is insisting on using full name that bad
Full names are fine. But the number of syllables in Alexandria-Elizabeth makes it a real mouthful, and I think that's the main issue. Nine-syllable names kind of cry out to be shortened, IMO.
~Benjamin Franklin
DS dx with celiac disease 5/28/10
I've always insisted that my name is Pamela, NOT Pam.
But Alexandria-Elizabeth is not even easy to say. It doesn't flow!
The end of Alexandria and the beginning of Elizabeth make it come out A-lex-an-dree-liz-a-beth.
Or if you want to make sure it doesn't run together, it comes out Alexandria... Elizabeth. It's almost like 10 syllables, if you count the pause in between.
I agree with this. It's fine that the mom wants the child to be called by their proper name, but it is a very long name.
I know a lot of moms who have insisted that their child will not have a nickname (my cousins' kids), but nicknames just seem to be inevitable. I guess it goes both ways: I don't understand the big deal about a child having nicknames (especially when I have about 5 myself), but I could see where a mom might get upset.
I'm Angela, not Angie...ever! But, like pps have said, that is a lot different than Alexandria-Elizabeth (the hyphen, also, just makes my skin crawl).
I highly doubt Alexandria-Elizabeth will go by her full name when she gets older.
pinterest
This!
Our daughter is Lillie Kate and we couldn't even get her to say that. She named herself Lillie.
I guess I haven't gotten to the post that inspired this one yet, but no, it is not pretentious to insist that a full name be used. For example, I love the name Kimberley, but if I used it, I would never, ever allow anyone to call my daughter Kim.
My sister has had a similar problem her whole life--her name is Brianna. Bri . . . ANNA. Not Bri-ON-a. There is no "o" in her name! We've been correcting people on this practically since the day of her birth, but at least where her family and friends are concerned they now firmly know the difference. No one even attempts to mispronounce it now. Like the PP said, correcting everyone from the very onset is key!
Proud Mama to Mickey (12.03.09) and Nemo (06.06.13)
This! Thanks ladies for explaining! No one said its wrong to call by full name. Its just our humble opinion (and now I pray) that you don't use 9 syllables to name the child! Anyone is free to name their child the whole alphabet as the first name but if I see that I would shorten and call that person "AtoZ". And someone will be inspired by that name and rename another child Aytozee.. and on and on.. LOL!
This.
Agreed!!!!!
My name name is Rebekah and I have ALWAYS been that. My mom insisted I never be a Becky and as I got older, I followed suit and asked that I always be called Rebekah.
My name is Caroline and I went by Carly right up until I was old enough to express my disgust for the nickname. I think I was about 3. I just didn't like it, and preferred to be called Caroline. I haven't been called by a nickname in 20+ years now.
You can do whatever you want as a parent - but your kid will have a personality and will make their own decisions regarding what they want to be called.
We're being careful to pick names with no obvious nicknames (since I'm not big on them) OR nicknames that we can deal with if the kid chooses to use them.
~EDD Nov 18, 2017 with my IUI success story~
[spoiler]
I don't know about that. My brother really wanted to go by Matt by the time he was 4 or so, even though my mom insisted on Matthew.
40/112