So my much larger Baby B has went from vertex to transverse. My doc knows I want to attempt a vaginal delivery, but I am worried now that the larger Baby B is transverse. Baby A has always been first in line, head down and the smaller of the two. I hope that Baby B decides to follow the rules and get back to vertex position.
Would any of you decided to go ahead with a c/s if this happened to you? I'm afraid of the "double whammy" but not petrified. My concern is for the health of Baby B and the complications that can arise, doing a breech extraction, etc, just because she is measuring to be the bigger baby. Has anyone's experiences been similar to this?
Re: WWYD?
My OB said that Baby A had to be bigger to have a vaginal delivery (besides being head down.)
I would probably opt for the section, but I was OK with the idea of a section the whole time anyway. (And wound up with one since they were both breech.)
My baby b went from transverse to breech the whole pregnancy. Baby A was always vertex. I had a vaginal delivery and B flipped vertex once A was born. I've heard of B's in vertex flipping breech during labor, so anything can happen.
My B was always smaller though.
What does your OB feel comfortable with?
If I heard that I would have the c/s, but I never wanted to have my kids vaginally so maybe I'm biased. The recovery time from my section was minimal...I was up and walking the next day & able to take care of the babies with no problems.
Here's my personal thoughts on "bigger B babies". Women deliver big singletons vaginally all the time. And w/o the helpful "prep" of a baby that came out first. So why is it such a big deal w/ twins if Baby B is bigger?
I guess I never had to deal w/ that issue myself, so I don't have all the facts. But if your OB is fine w/ it and you are prepared for anything, than go for it.
My doc said he wouldn't do a vaginal delivery is baby B is bigger than baby A. I never asked why because I had so much stuff running through my head at that moment, but he was pretty concrete on the matter.
GL!
My babies measured the same at my last growth scan before my induction. Baby B kept flipping back and forth between breech and vertex during those last 7 weeks. Both boys were head-down when my induction started but after I pushed A out the OB did a u/s and B was breech again! (Not sure at what point he flipped; I think right after A came out but it's hard to say.) So the dr. did a breech extraction. My babies were only 3 oz apart (though both almost a pound heavier than last u/s estimate) so it really didn't matter which was bigger.
The reason it makes a difference w/twins if B is bigger is really just if B flips to breech or transverse after A comes out. That can't happen with singletons and if it's known that the singleton is breech the mom would usually have a C-section. But with twins, you can't know what position Baby B will be in for delivery; it's harder to do a successful breech extraction on a baby who's larger than the one who just came out. I would think it would have to be a pretty major size difference though to really matter.
That said, as long as your OB is comfortable with vaginal delivery (and hopefully with breech extraction for Baby B if necessary), I would go for it.