DS gets only breastmilk. He did have 1.5 days of formula supplementation when he was born due to jaundice and weight loss, but not a drop since.
He gets about 5 bottles of expressed milk per week (and rarely finishes more than 1 ounce), usually during the night so I can get some rest.
From some other posts I've read, because DS gets an occasional bottle, he is not "EBF." WTH? The vehicle for the BM matters?
So, when you read the phrase "EBF," or use it, what does it mean to you? That baby ONLY ever eats from the boob, or that he only eats breastmilk?
If it is the former, then what is the acronym I (or an EPer, for instance) would use? EBMF?
Discuss.


Re: Kinda random: What do you consider to be EBF?
To me it means he only eats at the breast...but that's because my baby only eats at the breast. He has yet to take a bottle of pumped milk or formula and I don't plan on it (pumped milk) for a long while. I really really pray I don't have to introduce formula to him...I had to with my older two and I want to go strictly breast milk this time around.
Anyhow...if you want to say that you EBF even though he does get pumped milk in bottles, I don't care. I don't really care about all these "titles" in the first place. As long as you are doing what you need to do for you and your child that's all that should really matter.
I think this...
but not sure
I am a runner, knitter, scientist, DE-IVF veteran, and stage III colon cancer survivor.
Very interesting question.
My LO gets one bottle of BM per day and I consider myself in the EBF category.
I know there are some people who consider EBF as only from the breast, but I agree with you that this seems kinda silly.
Honestly though, I consider EPers in the EBF category as well.
To me, any baby that doesn't get formula is EBF.
this! If LO never gets formula I think thats EBF. It came from the boob at some point, whether it takes a detour through a bottle or not, I don't think that matters.
This seems super judgey to me to say babies who drink expressed BM are not EBF, I think if you are pumping or nursing you are getting them the breast milk whatever way you can and if you want to say you EBF you have every right to. Who the heck cares anyway? Seems like some people just want to say I EBF but you pumpers dont count? For whatever reason not everyone can nurse exclusively, IMO this does not make one method of feeding any better/worse than the other.
I take EBF meaning DD only gets BM. I pump 1 bottle a day so that DH can feed her and have time with her.
If that means I'm no longer an EBF'er then I don't want to be
But really I think it's good for DD to get used to having a bottle so that when we go out she doesn't freak out.
IMHO, This.
For the purposes of using the Bump boards, I interpret EBF as mostly or only fed at the breast, maybe with some bottle feedings of BM - as opposed to pumpers who EP.
The only reason I think it matters is because people who feed baby at the breast will have different experiences and questions than people who only pump. Like most online acronyms, it's just a shorthand way of letting people know the context of your question or comment.
this is all well and fine if that is what you believe in, but if you don't attempt to have your LO take a bottle soon, he may never take one. do you plan to never be apart from your LO for the entire time he breastfeeds?? this seems a little extreme to me.....what if you run out to the store and get stuck in traffic? i know a couple that never gave their LO a bottle and the mom broke her leg--you can imagine the mayhem that took place while she was in the hospital--their baby wouldn't take a bottle.
I think this is a GREAT idea - seriously! EBF, EBMF, EP, FF, whatever
I do agree with Ibis that acronyms can provide context for questions, (and in this way, EP, BF, and FF would probably be adequate to cover the spectrum) but I have seen posts that implied that if you give an occasional bottle then you are not EBF. As though it is somehow "lesser" than EBF, for lack of a better word. Again, I could totally be projecting a certain amount of defensiveness here.
I am a runner, knitter, scientist, DE-IVF veteran, and stage III colon cancer survivor.
So I would not be an EBFer since I had to supplement for ~6 feeds? just curious. typing w/ 1 hand since lo is latched on
I am a runner, knitter, scientist, DE-IVF veteran, and stage III colon cancer survivor.
This.
I would say if a baby isn't getting formula (outside of the type you're referencing--a few feedings near birth for medial reasons and the like), the mom is EBFing. I say that because I would still apply that label even after solids are introduced (ie: a six+ month old can still be EBF).
I tend to assume that most or all of the babies meals come directly from the breast as that seems to be the context used on the Bump (and I really haven't heard 'EBF' outside of the Bump). We also give DD the occasional bottle of pumped milk and I'd say we EBF.
Isn't it crazy how much guilt/pressure/etc. there is surrounding breast feeding? I have a couple parenting books that made me feel like I was depriving DD of crucial bonding because she gets a bottle a couple times/week. It's nuts.