Upstate NY Babies

Guide me mommas, on which...

genetic testing you did...

My office handed me paperwork for...

1. Cystic fibrosis Carrier screening.

2. SequentialScreen (which looks like the NT scan.)

3. Carrier testing for common genetic diseases. (CF, Spinal Muscular Atrophy, and Fragile X syndrome).

What did you have done for testing? Do you recommend all three? Any other words of wisedom?

Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker image

Re: Guide me mommas, on which...

  • Honestly, insurance didn't cover the testing and it wasn't a requirement of our offices, so we opted not to do any of them.  We did the normal bloodwork at the beginning of the pregnancy and our routine 20 week ultrasound, plus an extra ultrasound at 13 weeks due to bleeding.  If we had a family history of any of the birth defects, etc., I would have done it.  But, we don't, and we knew we'd continue the pregnancy no matter what.
  • Loading the player...
  • Are you still with CNY Women's Healthcare?  My DH and I had all of the testing because he is adopted so we have no idea what his genetic/family history might be.  CNY Women's said it might be covered by my insurance, but there was no way to know until after the testing.  So, now a year later and several resubmits to the insurance, I just paid $304 to Genzyme (the testing co). 

    We wouldn't have aborted even if anything had been found, so looking back I think we shouldn't have done the testing, but I felt really pressured to do it.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • None.  We opted for no testing because we would not abort unless there was something serverely wrong and no chance of baby surviving outside the womb like missing vital organs or something.  And for the most part, we would have seen anything that severe on the routine 20W U/S.  
  • Besides the routine blood draw we only did one test for down syndrom. I don't remember the name of it but it was a fairly new way of testing. It was a finger prick and then they did an ultra sound. They wanted us to do a test for Cystic Fyrbosis because DH has a 1st cousin with it. But we opted not to do it. They were fine with it and just took a really good look at the spine during our 18 week u/s. My dr. office gave me paper work for tests too but it was our choice if we wanted to do them. We opted not to do any testing.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • We definitely did both 1 and 2. The CF one was actually before i was pregnant (when we saw the RE). I had a 50% chance of being a carrier, so i was VERY relieved when I wasn't..  We just did the NT scan though, not the entire sequential screen.. but that just depends on the dr. office.  

    I don't know if I was screened for the other diseases.. I am thinking no because I had no family history. 

    Melissa & Jeff 5-27-06
    m/c 1/2/08 and 3/12/08
    Eve Amelia- Born 2/24/09. 6lb 9.9oz
    Natalie Ruth - Born 6/13/11 7lb 6.6oz
    imagebabies
    baby growth
  • 1) Are you in a risk pool? Are you okay with extra u/s? (assuming you're not in a risk pool.)

    2) Does your insurance cover it? Would you pay for it if it wasn't?

    3) If the initial screen comes back that you're at a higher risk are you comfortable with an amnio?

    DD1 4.14.10
    DD2 8.22.13
    MMC 1.4.17 at 16w
    Expecting #3, EDD 1.29.18

    Pregnancy Ticker
  • The CF screen was part of my initial blood work, part of the script, so they never gave me the option to not do it.  We also had the NT scan where they do the finger prick for Downs at that time.  Never had any extra tests done.
  • imageCutemin:
    None.  We opted for no testing because we would not abort unless there was something serverely wrong and no chance of baby surviving outside the womb like missing vital organs or something.  And for the most part, we would have seen anything that severe on the routine 20W U/S.  

    I see this said a lot on the boards.  And I know that no one on this board is insinuating the alternative.  But we did all the testing that you could do that wasn't invasive.  I was not high risk and didn't want the amnio, but we did the others.  We also would not abort either way.  But we wanted the testing done so that we could be prepared.  I figure that when you are looking for pedis or daycares, some of the things you would be looking for are different if the child has different needs.  Or even may want to meet with the nicu if certain medical concerns would be important for early monitoring, like in cystic fibrosis or downs syndrome.  Also, on a personal note, I would want to "grieve" and come to terms with it before the baby was born so that the day of the delivery wouldn't be shock and sadness because I would want to have any baby be born into happiness and I would feel guilt over it if I didn't start his/her life that way.

  • imagejnk062602:

    imageCutemin:
    None.  We opted for no testing because we would not abort unless there was something serverely wrong and no chance of baby surviving outside the womb like missing vital organs or something.  And for the most part, we would have seen anything that severe on the routine 20W U/S.  

    I see this said a lot on the boards.  And I know that no one on this board is insinuating the alternative.  But we did all the testing that you could do that wasn't invasive.  I was not high risk and didn't want the amnio, but we did the others.  We also would not abort either way.  But we wanted the testing done so that we could be prepared.  I figure that when you are looking for pedis or daycares, some of the things you would be looking for are different if the child has different needs.  Or even may want to meet with the nicu if certain medical concerns would be important for early monitoring, like in cystic fibrosis or downs syndrome.  Also, on a personal note, I would want to "grieve" and come to terms with it before the baby was born so that the day of the delivery wouldn't be shock and sadness because I would want to have any baby be born into happiness and I would feel guilt over it if I didn't start his/her life that way.

    I feel the same as jnk.  I would want to do all the research I possibly could.  Plus my insurance paid for the NT scan and I wanted an extra U/S.  This time we have to pay $40 for the U/S.  We are still going to to do it.

  • imagejnk062602:

    imageCutemin:
    None.  We opted for no testing because we would not abort unless there was something serverely wrong and no chance of baby surviving outside the womb like missing vital organs or something.  And for the most part, we would have seen anything that severe on the routine 20W U/S.  

    I see this said a lot on the boards.  And I know that no one on this board is insinuating the alternative.  But we did all the testing that you could do that wasn't invasive.  I was not high risk and didn't want the amnio, but we did the others.  We also would not abort either way.  But we wanted the testing done so that we could be prepared.  I figure that when you are looking for pedis or daycares, some of the things you would be looking for are different if the child has different needs.  Or even may want to meet with the nicu if certain medical concerns would be important for early monitoring, like in cystic fibrosis or downs syndrome.  Also, on a personal note, I would want to "grieve" and come to terms with it before the baby was born so that the day of the delivery wouldn't be shock and sadness because I would want to have any baby be born into happiness and I would feel guilt over it if I didn't start his/her life that way.

    This entirely.  My DH is adopted and we have no medical background, so anything that could help us prepare, that wasn't invasive, we wanted.  It didn't hurt that insurance covered it all too and to be honest, hearing the odds after the testing was a nice relief too.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic Lilypie Second Birthday tickers BabyName Ticker
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"