Definitely prefer Brennan, but your other two might be jealous that you spelled his name properly and not theirs. You should probably stick with Brenner. Its degree of atrocity equals the other two.
PS- It's a public message board. You post it = people get to comment on it.
Definitely prefer Brennan, but your other two might be jealous that you spelled his name properly and not theirs. You should probably stick with Brenner. Its degree of atrocity equals the other two.
PS- It's a public message board. You post it = people get to comment on it.
:applauds:
Married in 2008 - DD born in 2010 - EDD 6.15.2012!
Wow, thanks. But I wasn't asking for opinions on those two names. Especially because I have already named them.
Yea, seriously. That was uncalled for in my book.
At any rate, I think Brenner matches the other names well, and although it's a little different, I don't think it's "strange." I agree with the post about Brenner sounding like a cute little surfer boy.
Ignore the mean spirited comments. Just b/c this is a mess. bd, imo, it does not mean you should be as nasty as possible. There is such a thing as self control. Not every thought has to be shared- esp. when it was not even asked for. What happened to kindness? I've actually never met a truly happy person who felt such a strong need to spread negativity so you have to wonder....
Definitely prefer Brennan, but your other two might be jealous that you spelled his name properly and not theirs. You should probably stick with Brenner. Its degree of atrocity equals the other two.
PS- It's a public message board. You post it = people get to comment on it.
agree. and newportbride, maybe she is just fed up with seeing people name their children difficult names.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Actually, I do apologize for my post. I thought you had said your other two choices were Konnor and Tannar, so I read it wrong. I apologize if I hurt your feelings; if I had read it correctly, I would have kept my thoughts to myself about your first two sons' names.
Re: Opinions on the name...
I guess I am trying to repeat the pattern because I don't want him to feel left out. Does it sound too weird?
Wow, thanks. But I wasn't asking for opinions on those two names. Especially because I have already named them.
That's exactly what I was thinking! Brennar is cute. It's not really my style, but clearly follows suit with the names you already love.
She already named them Konner and Tannar. That's rude. ?
Like it.
I like Brennan!
PS- It's a public message board. You post it = people get to comment on it.
:applauds:
I like Brennan or Branson better than Brenner.
Yea, seriously. That was uncalled for in my book.
At any rate, I think Brenner matches the other names well, and although it's a little different, I don't think it's "strange." I agree with the post about Brenner sounding like a cute little surfer boy.
I think Brenner is a good choice!
Ignore the mean spirited comments. Just b/c this is a mess. bd, imo, it does not mean you should be as nasty as possible. There is such a thing as self control. Not every thought has to be shared- esp. when it was not even asked for. What happened to kindness? I've actually never met a truly happy person who felt such a strong need to spread negativity so you have to wonder....
agree. and newportbride, maybe she is just fed up with seeing people name their children difficult names.
I really like it. It reminds me of the actor Yul Brynner, and I think it goes well with your other names.
I also like that it doesn't start with the same letter as your other sons' names (which keeps it from being too confusing). I say use it!
Other similar suggestions are Palmer, Parker, Taylor, Turner, Wilder, and Warner.
I do not like it. It is what a lot of people call breakfast for dinner (maybe not spelled that way, but still).