For those of us who have had c-sections before, and may be doing a planned c-section this time around (whether because you prefer that, or you and your doctor decided that may be safer than a VBAC), I wanted to bring up the topic of gentle c-sections. I'm curious if anyone has had one before (or knows someone who has) or is considering going this route. As far as I know they aren't very well known (at least in the US) - basically it's trying to make the experience feel like a birth and not just an operation (some doctors may allow you to have music playing, some may make modifications to allow you to see your belly while it happens, some allow you to hold your baby right away to do skin to skin as you would for a vaginal delivery, delayed cord cutting, etc.).
This will be my second child, and with my first I ending up having to have a c-section. It was pretty disappointing (I had been hoping to avoid one) and stressful (recovering from major surgery, etc.). What I disliked most about the actual c-section was I couldn't hold my baby right away, I got to see her and touch her, then she was taken away while I layed there being stitched up. This next time around I may do a gentle c-section instead of attempting a VBAC (the circumstances around why I needed the first c-section makes it sound like I might not be able to do a VBAC successfully). Gentle c-sections can vary greatly, but all I'm aiming for is being able to hold my baby right away (like with a vaginal delivery) so I can do skin to skin and start trying to breastfeed (instead of having to wait 30-45 minutes). My doctor seems on board with it, but I made a point not to use the term 'gentle c-section' per the mid-wife's suggestion as it seems some doctors might be weary of them because they can be a bit unconventional like letting the baby 'climb' out.
Re: Gentle C-sections
This time im hoping for a VBAC but I'm not the most likely candidate to go into labor spontaneously, so if it doesn't happen, I hope for a c section similar to my
first one, without my daughter being taken while I'm in recovery if possible
I'm opting for a repeat c section this time because I don't want to vbac. My OB says they do immediate skin to skin and everything is done at my bedside for the baby while in recovery. So s/he won't have to leave my sight. Unless there are complications, of course. Maybe that is an option for you? A planned c section is much smoother than an unplanned/emergency. I would ask if that can be incorporated
@babybluu, yeah, it sucks having your newborn taken away for so long so quickly and as far as I know, they wouldn't do that for a vaginal delivery. So assuming you're in the right state of mind and able to hold them and they aren't in distress, why not let us C-section people hold them.
@livingthedream-3, that's great you have a place that automatically does that! Just curious, are you saying since you've had 2 c-sections already you'll be doing a VBAC instead?
So, with my first c-section they took him out and weighed him and measured him quick (DH was right there and got to cut part of the cord) which took maybe 2-3 minutes and then they brought him over to me to see him while they were finishing stitching me up. DH then took him to the recovery room, and I met them there within about 15 minutes to start with skin to skin and nursing. For me, that was quick enough and I didn't have a problem with the wait.
The only thing I'd like to do differently this time is for them to drop the sheet when baby is coming out so I can watch. DH watched with our first and got some great pictures, but I'd like to be able to see babe as they're born.
I was asked if I wanted a stork nurse present to do skin to skin and breastfeed, and I was like hell ya! I was so excited since after my first I didn't hold her for almost an hour after she was born and it sucked.
@ashleyf911, I've also known people who were completely fine with however long it took before they could hold their newborn. I kind of envy that...less reason/chance for me to be disappointed.